Case number 2:20-cv-06339
One-E-Way, Inc. v. Apple Inc. > Documents
| Date Field | Doc. No. | Description (Pages) |
|---|---|---|
| Jul 15, 2022 | 110 | NOTIFICATION from Federal Circuit Court of Appeals of case number assigned and briefing schedule. Appeal Docket No. 2022-2020 assigned to Notice of Appeal to Federal Circuit Court of Appeals 109 as to Plaintiff One-E-Way, Inc.. (yl) (Entered: 07/18/2022) (4) |
| Jul 13, 2022 | N/A | TRANSMISSION of the Notice of Appeal, Docket Sheet, Judgment and or order e-mailed to the US Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit re: Notice of Appeal to Federal Circuit Court of Appeals 109 . (mat) (Entered: 07/13/2022) (0) |
| Jul 12, 2022 | 109 | NOTICE OF APPEAL to the Federal Circuit Court of Appeals filed by Plaintiff One-E-Way, Inc.. Appeal of Judgment, 106 . (Appeal Fee - $505 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-33614941.) (Muehlhauser, Douglas) (Entered: 07/12/2022) (5) |
| Jul 12, 2022 | 109 | Complaint?* (1) |
| Jul 8, 2022 | 108 | ORDER RE STIPULATION TO TOLL DEADLINES REGARDING ATTORNEYS' FEES AND COSTS (DKT. 107 ) by Judge John A. Kronstadt. The Stipulation is APPROVED. The deadline for the filing of any application, motion, or other request to the Court for recovery of costs, expenses, and/or attorneys fees in view of the Judgment entered in this action (Dkt. 106) is hereby tolled until the later of (1) twenty-eight (28)days after the Courts receipt of the mandate from the United States Court ofAppeals for the Federal Circuit from any appeal of the Judgment, or (2) twenty-eight(28)days after the expiration of the deadline to file a notice of appeal from the Judgment. IT IS SO ORDERED. (yl) (Entered: 07/11/2022) (2) |
| Jul 7, 2022 | 107 | STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Application or Motion for Attorneys' Fees and/or Costs filed by Defendant Apple Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Mead, Lowell) (Entered: 07/07/2022) (0) |
| Jul 6, 2022 | 106 | JUDGMENT by Judge John A. Kronstadt. On June 15, 2022, Defendant Apple Inc.'s Motion for Summary Judgment of Non-infringement (Dkt. 102) was granted. Accordingly, judgment of non-infringement of U.S. Patent Nos. 10,129,627 and 10,468,047 is hereby entered in favor of Defendant and against Plaintiff One- E-Way, Inc. All claims asserted by Plaintiff against Defendant in this action are dismissed with prejudice. IT IS SO ORDERED. (MD JS-6, Case Terminated). (yl) (Entered: 07/07/2022) (2) |
| Jul 1, 2022 | 104 | TRANSCRIPT for proceedings held on 6/02/2022 12:56 p.m. - 1:42 p.m.. Court Reporter/Electronic Court Recorder: Judy K. Moore, phone number judy_moore@cacd.uscourts.gov. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Electronic Court Recorder before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Notice of Intent to Redact due within 7 days of this date. Redaction Request due 7/22/2022. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 8/1/2022. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 9/29/2022. (Moore, Judy) (Entered: 07/01/2022) (29) |
| Jul 1, 2022 | 105 | NOTICE OF FILING TRANSCRIPT filed for proceedings 6/0/2022 12:56 p.m. - 1:42 p.m. re Transcript 104 THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (Moore, Judy) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 07/01/2022) (0) |
| Jun 29, 2022 | 103 | NOTICE OF LODGING filed of Proposed Judgment re Order on Motion for Summary Judgment, 102 (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Judgment)(Mead, Lowell) (Entered: 06/29/2022) (0) |
| Jun 15, 2022 | 102 | (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF NON-INFRINGEMENT (DKT. 95 ) by Judge John A. Kronstadt. For the reasons stated in this Order, the Motion is GRANTED. Defendant shall file a proposed judgment within 14 days of the issuance of this order for this case. (lom) (Entered: 06/15/2022) (11) |
| Jun 2, 2022 | 101 | MINUTES OF DEFENDANT APPLE'S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT OF NON-INFRINGEMENT (DKT. 95 ) held before Judge John A. Kronstadt. Counsel address the Court. The Court takes the Motion UNDER SUBMISSION and a ruling will be issued. IT IS SO ORDERED. Court Reporter: Judy Moore. (lom) (Entered: 06/07/2022) (1) |
| May 12, 2022 | 100 | REPLY In Support NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Summary Judgment as to of Non-Infringement 95 filed by Defendant Apple Inc.. (Keefe, Heidi) (Entered: 05/12/2022) (15) |
| May 5, 2022 | 96 | MEMORANDUM in Opposition to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Summary Judgment as to of Non-Infringement 95 filed by Plaintiff One-E-Way, Inc.. (Muehlhauser, Douglas) (Entered: 05/05/2022) (28) |
| May 5, 2022 | 97 | STATEMENT of Genuine Disputes of Material Fact in Opposition to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Summary Judgment as to of Non-Infringement 95 filed by Plaintiff One-E-Way, Inc.. (Muehlhauser, Douglas) (Entered: 05/05/2022) (11) |
| May 5, 2022 | 98 | STATEMENT of Additional Material Facts in Opposition to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Summary Judgment as to of Non-Infringement 95 filed by Plaintiff One-E-Way, Inc.. (Muehlhauser, Douglas) (Entered: 05/05/2022) (26) |
| May 5, 2022 | 99 | DECLARATION of Douglas G. Muehlhauser in opposition to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Summary Judgment as to of Non-Infringement 95 filed by Plaintiff One-E-Way, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7)(Muehlhauser, Douglas) (Entered: 05/05/2022) (0) |
| Apr 21, 2022 | 94 | NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Dena Chen on behalf of Defendant Apple Inc. (Attorney Dena Chen added to party Apple Inc.(pty:dft))(Chen, Dena) (Entered: 04/21/2022) (2) |
| Apr 21, 2022 | 95 | NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Summary Judgment as to of Non-Infringement filed by Defendant Apple Inc.. Motion set for hearing on 6/2/2022 at 01:30 PM before Judge John A. Kronstadt. (Attachments: # 1 Statement of Uncontroverted Facts and Conclusions of Law, # 2 Declaration Lowell D. Mead, # 3 Exhibit A, # 4 Exhibit B, # 5 Exhibit C1, # 6 Exhibit C2, # 7 Exhibit C3, # 8 Exhibit D, # 9 Exhibit E, # 10 Exhibit F, # 11 Exhibit G, # 12 Exhibit H, # 13 Exhibit I, # 14 Exhibit J, # 15 Exhibit K, # 16 Exhibit L, # 17 Exhibit M, # 18 Exhibit N, # 19 Exhibit O) (Keefe, Heidi) (Entered: 04/21/2022) (0) |
| Apr 18, 2022 | 93 | Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Pushkal Mishra counsel for Plaintiff One-E-Way, Inc.. Adding Pushkal Mishra as counsel of record for One-E-Way, Inc. for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Plaintiff One-E-Way, Inc.. (Attorney Pushkal Mishra added to party One-E-Way, Inc.(pty:pla))(Mishra, Pushkal) (Entered: 04/18/2022) (2) |
| Apr 13, 2022 | 92 | REPLY in support of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Reconsideration re Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held 86 - Claim Construction Order 87 filed by Plaintiff One-E-Way, Inc.. (Muehlhauser, Douglas) (Entered: 04/13/2022) (12) |
| Apr 12, 2022 | 91 | ORDER RE APPLE'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR SCHEDULE ADJUSTMENT OR, IN THE ALTERNATIVE, REQUEST FOR STATUS CONFERENCE (DKT. 89 ) by Judge John A. Kronstadt, the Motion is GRANTED IN PART, and the case schedule is amended as follows: Apples Early Motion for Summary Judgment: 4/21/2022. One-E-Way's Opposition to Apple's MSJ: 5/5/2022. Apple's Reply in Support of its MSJ: 5/12/2022. Hearing on Apple's MSJ: 6/2/2022. The remaining deadlines are vacated and will be set following the decision on Apples anticipated motion for summary judgment. (jp) (Entered: 04/12/2022) (2) |
| Apr 6, 2022 | 89 | NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Amend Order,,, Terminate Deadlines and Hearings,,, Set/Reset Deadlines,, 81 Apple's Unopposed Motion for Schedule Adjustment or, In The Alternative, Request for Status Conference filed by Defendant Apple Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order) (Mead, Lowell) (Entered: 04/06/2022) (0) |
| Apr 6, 2022 | 90 | OPPOSITION to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Reconsideration re Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held 86 - Claim Construction Order 87 filed by Defendant Apple Inc.. (Mead, Lowell) (Entered: 04/06/2022) (17) |
| Mar 23, 2022 | 87 | NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Reconsideration re Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held 86 - Claim Construction Order filed by Plaintiff One-E-Way, Inc.. Motion set for hearing on 7/18/2022 at 08:30 AM before Judge John A. Kronstadt. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order) (Muehlhauser, Douglas) (Entered: 03/23/2022) (0) |
| Mar 23, 2022 | 88 | MEMORANDUM in Support of NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION for Reconsideration re Minutes of In Chambers Order/Directive - no proceeding held 86 - Claim Construction Order 87 filed by Plaintiff One-E-Way, Inc.. (Muehlhauser, Douglas) (Entered: 03/23/2022) (10) |
| Mar 9, 2022 | 86 | MINUTE (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER REGARDING CLAIM CONSTRUCTION by Judge John A. Kronstadt: The disputed terms at issue are construed. (See Civil Minutes for further specifics). (jp) (Entered: 03/09/2022) (21) |
| Jan 28, 2022 | 85 | STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish. Granting Stipulation for Protective Order 84 . (lom) (Entered: 01/28/2022) (36) |
| Jan 27, 2022 | 84 | Joint STIPULATION for Protective Order filed by Defendant Apple Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Protective Order)(Keefe, Heidi) (Entered: 01/27/2022) (0) |
| Jan 25, 2022 | 81 | ORDER RE JOINT STIPULATION TO PARTIALLY AMEND THE CASE SCHEDULE (DKT. 80 )by Judge John A. Kronstadt, the Stipulation is APPROVED. The case schedule is amended as follows: Last day to file motions to compel fact discovery (new): 4/21/2022. Last day to file a notice of settlement or a joint report re status of settlement: 4/29/2022. Post Mediation Status Conference: 5/9/2022 at 11:30 AM. Close of Expert Discovery (was Discovery Cut-Off): 9/1/2022. Last Date to File Motions: 9/20/2022. (See attached Order for further specifics). (jp) (Entered: 01/25/2022) (3) |
| Jan 25, 2022 | 82 | NOTICE filed by Defendant Apple Inc.. Stipulation of Dismissal of U.S. Patent No. 8,131,391 (Keefe, Heidi) (Entered: 01/25/2022) (4) |
| Jan 25, 2022 | 83 | NOTICE filed by Defendant Apple Inc.. Joint Notice of Partial Mootness of Pending Claim Construction Issues (Attachments: # 1 The Parties' Proposed Constructions of Disputed Terms)(Keefe, Heidi) (Entered: 01/25/2022) (0) |
| Jan 21, 2022 | 80 | Joint STIPULATION to Amend Pretrial-Trial Scheduling Order - form only,,, 60 filed by Defendant Apple Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Keefe, Heidi) (Entered: 01/21/2022) (0) |
| Jan 18, 2022 | 79 | (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER by Judge John A. Kronstadt. On the Court's own motion, the Claims Construction (Markman) Hearing scheduled for January 24, 2022 at 8:30 AM is taken off calendar. No appearance by counsel is necessary. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (tj) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 01/18/2022) (0) |
| Jan 13, 2022 | 78 | MINUTES OF Order Re: Joint Motion for Protective Order and Notice of Dispute 75 held before Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish: The case is called. Counsel state their appearances. The court and counsel conferred as stated on the record regarding the Joint Motion for Protective Order and Notice of Dispute. (Dkt. No. 75) Denying without prejudice 75 Joint Motion for Protective Order. Court Reporter: N/A. (es) (Entered: 01/13/2022) (1) |
| Jan 10, 2022 | 77 | SCHEDULING NOTICE re: Joint MOTION for Protective Order 75 The Organizational call previously scheduled for 1/10/2021 at 1:30 pm has been rescheduled for 1/13/2022 at 11:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish. NOTE: During the telephone hearing, counsel must identify themselves before they speak for the benefit of the Court and the Court Recorder/Reporter. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (hc) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 01/10/2022) (0) |
| Jan 7, 2022 | 76 | SCHEDULING NOTICE: The Court has set an organizational call on January 10, 2022 at 1:30 p.m. before Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish. Re: Joint MOTION for Protective Order. 75 The Courtroom Deputy Clerk will provide the call-in details separately. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (hc) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 01/07/2022) (0) |
| Dec 27, 2021 | 75 | NOTICE OF MOTION AND Joint MOTION for Protective Order and Notice of Dispute filed by Defendant Apple Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Keefe, Heidi) (Entered: 12/27/2021) (0) |
| Dec 20, 2021 | 69 | NOTICE OF LODGING filed re Brief (non-motion non-appeal),, 66 (Keefe, Heidi) (Entered: 12/20/2021) (4) |
| Dec 20, 2021 | 70 | RESPONSIVE CLAIM CONSTRUCTION BRIEF filed by Plaintiff One-E-Way, Inc.. (Muehlhauser, Douglas) (Entered: 12/20/2021) (14) |
| Dec 20, 2021 | 71 | RESPONSE filed by Defendant Apple Inc.to Brief (non-motion non-appeal) 65 Apple's Responsive Claim Construction Brief (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Christopher Hansen, Ph.D., # 2 Declaration of Lowell D. Mead, # 3 Exhibit W, # 4 Exhibit X, # 5 Exhibit Y)(Keefe, Heidi) (Entered: 12/20/2021) (0) |
| Dec 20, 2021 | 72 | NOTICE of Lodging Claim Construction Materials (S.P.R. 3.5) filed by Plaintiff One-E-Way, Inc.. (Joint) (Attachments: # 1 Parties' Proposed Constructions of Disputed Terms)(Muehlhauser, Douglas) (Entered: 12/20/2021) (0) |
| Dec 20, 2021 | 73 | NOTICE of Lodging Presentation Slides for Markman Hearing filed by Plaintiff One-E-Way, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Plaintiff's Presentation Slides)(Muehlhauser, Douglas) (Entered: 12/20/2021) (0) |
| Dec 20, 2021 | 74 | NOTICE of Manual Filing filed by Plaintiff One-E-Way, Inc. of Claim Construction Materials submitted pursuant to Judge's Standing Order S.P.R. 3.5: 1) Annotated paper copies of certified file histories in binders and 2) electronic copies of file histories on USB flash drive. (Muehlhauser, Douglas) (Entered: 12/20/2021) (1) |
| Dec 6, 2021 | 65 | Claim Construction BRIEF filed by Plaintiff One-E-Way, Inc.. (Muehlhauser, Douglas) (Entered: 12/06/2021) (30) |
| Dec 6, 2021 | 66 | BRIEF filed by Defendant Apple Inc.. Opening Claim Construction Brief (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Christopher Hansen, Ph.D, # 2 Declaration of Lowell D. Mead, # 3 Exhibit A, # 4 Exhibit B, # 5 Exhibit C, # 6 Exhibit D, # 7 Exhibit E, # 8 Exhibit F, # 9 Exhibit G, # 10 Exhibit H, # 11 Exhibit I, # 12 Exhibit J, # 13 Exhibit K, # 14 Exhibit L, # 15 Exhibit M, # 16 Exhibit N, # 17 Exhibit O, # 18 Exhibit P, # 19 Exhibit Q, # 20 Exhibit R, # 21 Exhibit S, # 22 Exhibit T, # 23 Exhibit U, # 24 Exhibit V)(Keefe, Heidi) (Entered: 12/06/2021) (0) |
| Dec 6, 2021 | 67 | DECLARATION of Douglas B. Wentzel re Brief (non-motion non-appeal) 65 Opening Claim Construction Brief filed by Plaintiff One-E-Way, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7, # 8 Exhibit 8, # 9 Exhibit 9, # 10 Exhibit 10, # 11 Exhibit 11, # 12 Exhibit 12, # 13 Exhibit 13, # 14 Exhibit 14, # 15 Exhibit 15, # 16 Exhibit 16, # 17 Exhibit 17, # 18 Exhibit 18, # 19 Exhibit 19, # 20 Exhibit 20, # 21 Exhibit 21, # 22 Exhibit 22, # 23 Exhibit 23, # 24 Exhibit 24)(Muehlhauser, Douglas) (Entered: 12/06/2021) (0) |
| Dec 6, 2021 | 68 | DECLARATION of Joseph C. McAlexander, III P.E, re Brief (non-motion non-appeal) 65 Opening Claim Construction Brief filed by Plaintiff One-E-Way, Inc.. (Muehlhauser, Douglas) (Entered: 12/06/2021) (22) |
| Nov 29, 2021 | 64 | NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Douglas Bryant Wentzel on behalf of Plaintiff One-E-Way, Inc. (Attorney Douglas Bryant Wentzel added to party One-E-Way, Inc.(pty:pla))(Wentzel, Douglas) (Entered: 11/29/2021) (2) |
| Nov 22, 2021 | 63 | STATEMENT Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement filed by Plaintiff One-E-Way, Inc. (Muehlhauser, Douglas) (Entered: 11/22/2021) (19) |
| Aug 24, 2021 | 62 | (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE MOTION TO STRIKE INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS (DKT. 24 ) by Judge John A. Kronstadt: The Motion is GRANTED-IN-PART concerning the "direct conversion module" and "coupled to" claim limitations. Additionally, if necessary to preserve any position or underlying factual matter that OEW wishes to raise, OEW may amend its infringement contentions regarding its own products practicing the claimed invention. OEW shall serve amended infringement contentions consistent with this Order within 14 days of the issuance of this Order. (See Civil Minutes for further specifics). (jp) (Entered: 08/24/2021) (10) |
| Aug 18, 2021 | 61 | JOINT REPORT of Regarding Agreed Upon Private Neutral filed by Defendant Apple Inc.. (Keefe, Heidi) (Entered: 08/18/2021) (3) |
| Jul 30, 2021 | 59 | ORDER/REFERRAL to ADR Procedure No 3 by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Case ordered to a private mediator based upon a stipulation of the parties or by the court order. ADR Proceeding to be held no later than April 25, 2022. Post Mediation Status Conference set for May 9, 2022 11:30 AM before Judge John A. Kronstadt. (tj) (Entered: 07/30/2021) (1) |
| Jul 30, 2021 | 60 | (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER SETTING PRETRIAL DEADLINES by Judge John A. Kronstadt: Based on a review of the parties' 12/4/2021 Joint Rule 16(b)/26(f) Report (Dkt. 42 ), 7/13/2021 Joint Report (Dkt. 56 ) and 7/26/2021 Joint Report Regarding Case Schedule (Dkt. 58 ), the following deadlines are set in this matter: Deadline to file joint report regarding agreed upon private neutral: 8/18/2021. Last day to amend or add parties: 8/30/2021. Last day to participate in a settlement conference/mediation: 4/25/2022. Last day to file notice of settlement/joint report re settlement: 4/29/2022. Post Mediation Status Conference: 5/9/2022 at 11:30 AM. Discovery Cut-Off: 6/20/2022. Last day to file All Motions (including discovery motions): 7/18/2022. (See Civil Minutes for Further Specifics). (jp) (Entered: 07/30/2021) (2) |
| Jul 27, 2021 | 58 | JOINT REPORT of the Parties Regarding Case Schedule Pursuant to July 20, 2021 Order 57 filed by Plaintiff One-E-Way, Inc.. (Muehlhauser, Douglas) (Entered: 07/27/2021) (15) |
| Jul 20, 2021 | 57 | (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE JOINT REPORT (DKT. 56 ) by Judge John A. Kronstadt: Based on a review of the parties' Joint Report (Dkt. 56 ), the stay of this action is lifted. On or before July 27, 2021, the parties shall file a joint report that states their collective and/or respective position(s) on the appropriate timetable for this action. A proposed schedule of pretrial and trial dates shall be completed and attached as Exhibit A to the joint report. See Dkt 10 ; Standing Order at 44, Ex. C-1. Based on a review of this joint report, and the previously-filed Joint Rule 16(b)/26(f) Report (Dkt. 42 ), a determination will be made as to whether a scheduling conference is necessary and whether a scheduling order shall issue before or after a ruling on Defendant's Motion to Strike One-E-Way's Infringement Contentions and to Compel Service of Amended Infringement Contentions (Dkt. 24 ). THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (jaklc2) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 07/20/2021) (0) |
| Jul 13, 2021 | 56 | STATUS REPORT Pursuant to June 21, 2021 Order 55 filed by Plaintiff One-E-Way, Inc.. (Muehlhauser, Douglas) (Entered: 07/13/2021) (4) |
| Jun 21, 2021 | 54 | STATUS REPORT (Joint) filed by Plaintiff One-E-Way, Inc.. (Muehlhauser, Douglas) (Entered: 06/21/2021) (4) |
| Jun 21, 2021 | 55 | (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER CONTINUING STAY AND SETTING DATE FOR FURTHER REPORT by Judge John A. Kronstadt: Based on a review of the Joint Status Report (Dkt. 54 ), it is determined that the stay of this action will remain in place. On the earlier of July 13, 2021, or within 10 days of Defendant filing a request for rehearing of one or more of the decisions of the Patent Trial and Appeal Board, the parties shall file a joint report that includes their collective and/or respective position(s) as to whether the stay of this action should be lifted. The stay of this matter will remain in place until further order from this Court. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (jaklc2) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 06/21/2021) (0) |
| May 28, 2021 | 52 | STATUS REPORT (Joint) filed by Defendant Apple Inc.. (Keefe, Heidi) (Entered: 05/28/2021) (4) |
| May 28, 2021 | 53 | (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER CONTINUING STAY AND SETTING DATE FOR FURTHER REPORT by Judge John A. Kronstadt: Based on a review of the Joint Status Report (Dkt. 52 ), it is determined that the stay of this action will remain in place. Counsel shall file a further joint report regarding the status of the petitions for inter partes review on the earlier of June 25, 2021, or within ten days following the issuance of any rulings as to the petitions. The stay of this matter will remain in place until further order from this Court. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (jaklc2) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 05/28/2021) (0) |
| Apr 16, 2021 | 50 | STATUS REPORT JOINT STATUS REPORT filed by Defendant Apple Inc.. (Keefe, Heidi) (Entered: 04/16/2021) (4) |
| Apr 16, 2021 | 51 | (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER CONTINUING STAY AND SETTING DATE FOR FURTHER REPORT by Judge John A. Kronstadt: Based on a review of the Joint Status Report (Dkt. 50 ), it is determined that the stay of this action will remain in place. Counsel shall file a further joint report regarding the of the status of the petitions for inter partes review on May 31, 2021, or within seven days following the issuance of any rulings as to the petitions. The stay of this matter will remain in place until further order from this Court. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (jaklc2) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 04/16/2021) (0) |
| Mar 16, 2021 | 49 | (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE MOTION TO STAY PENDING INTER PARTES REVIEW (DKT. 41 ) by Judge John A. Kronstadt: For the reasons stated above, a balancing of the relevant factors weighs in favor of entering a stay. All asserted claims of the Patents-in-Suit are subject to pending inter partes review. A stay will advance efficiency without imposing undue prejudice on Plaintiff. The parties have submitted their Joint 26(f) Report. See Dkt. 42 ; Dkt. 45 . At this time, all remaining S.P.R. requirements and deadlines are stayed until a determination is made on the pending IPR petitions. The Hearing regarding Defendant Apple Inc.s Motion to Strike One-E-Ways Infringement Contentions and to Compel Amended Infringement Contentions, (Dkt. 24 ), scheduled for 3/22/2021 at 8:30 AM is taken off calendar. For these reasons, the Motion is GRANTED as to the proceedings as to the patent claims; provided, however, this determination is without prejudice to the ability of either party to make an application to lift the stay for good cause shown based on events that occur after the issuance of this Order. The parties shall file a joint report on the earlier of every 45 days, or within seven days following the issuance of any rulings as to the pending requests for inter partes review, stating their respective and/or collective views as to the status of those proceedings, and whether the developments in those proceedings warrant lifting the stay. The first report shall be filed no later than 4/16/2021. (jp) (Entered: 03/16/2021) (5) |
| Jan 19, 2021 | 48 | (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER TAKING MOTION TO STAY PENDING INTER PARTES REVIEW (DKT. 41 ) OFF CALENDAR AND UNDER SUBMISSION by Judge John A. Kronstadt: The Court has considered the matters raised with respect to Defendant Apple Inc.s Motion to Stay (Dkt. 41). The Court has concluded that, pursuant to Local Rule 7-15, the matters can be decided without oral argument. The Court advises counsel that the Motion noticed for hearing on January 25, 2020, has been taken under submission and off its motion calendar. No appearance by counsel is necessary. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (tj) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 01/19/2021) (0) |
| Jan 15, 2021 | 47 | REPLY In Support NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Stay Case pending INTER PARTES REVIEW 41 filed by Defendant Apple Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of Lowell D. Mead, # 2 Exhibit A)(Keefe, Heidi) (Entered: 01/15/2021) (0) |
| Jan 8, 2021 | 45 | MEMORANDUM in Opposition to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Stay Case pending INTER PARTES REVIEW 41 filed by Plaintiff One-E-Way, Inc.. (Muehlhauser, Douglas) (Entered: 01/08/2021) (17) |
| Jan 8, 2021 | 46 | DECLARATION of Douglas G. Muehlhauser in Opposition to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Stay Case pending INTER PARTES REVIEW 41 filed by Plaintiff One-E-Way, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3)(Muehlhauser, Douglas) (Entered: 01/08/2021) (0) |
| Dec 14, 2020 | 44 | (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE MOTION TO STAY PENDING INTER PARTES REVIEW (DKT. 41 ) AND JOINT RULE 16(B)/26(F) REPORT (DKT. 42 ) by Judge John A. Kronstadt: Based on a review of Defendant's Motion to Stay Pending Inter Partes Review (the "Motion" (Dkt. 41 )), a determination has been made that the hearing on the Motion should be advanced. Accordingly, the hearing presently set for April 26, 2021 is advanced to January 25, 2021. Plaintiff shall file an opposition to the Motion, or statement of non-opposition, on or before January 8, 2021. Defendant shall file any reply in support of the Motion on or before January 15, 2021. Following a determination of the Motion, a scheduling order will issue based on a review of the parties' Joint Rule 16(b)/26(f) Report (Dkt. 42 ), if appropriate. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (jaklc2) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 12/14/2020) (0) |
| Dec 7, 2020 | 43 | ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT UPON RECUSAL by Magistrate Judge Patricia Donahue. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment Discovery pursuant to General Order 05-07. Case randomly reassigned from Magistrate Judge Patricia Donahue to Magistrate Judge Gail J. Standish for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:20-cv-06339 JAK(GJSx). (rn) (Entered: 12/07/2020) (1) |
| Dec 4, 2020 | 41 | NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Stay Case pending INTER PARTES REVIEW filed by Defendant Apple Inc. Apple Inc.. Motion set for hearing on 4/26/2021 at 08:30 AM before Judge John A. Kronstadt. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration Lowell D. Mead Dec iso Apple's Notice of Motion and Motion to Stay, # 2 Exhibit Exhibit A, # 3 Exhibit Exhibit B, # 4 Exhibit Exhibit C, # 5 Exhibit Exhibit D, # 6 Exhibit Exhibit E, # 7 Exhibit Exhibit F) (Keefe, Heidi) (Entered: 12/04/2020) (0) |
| Dec 4, 2020 | 42 | JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 5-7 days, filed by Defendant Apple Inc... (Keefe, Heidi) (Entered: 12/04/2020) (15) |
| Nov 19, 2020 | 40 | (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE STIPULATION AND [PROPOSED] ORDER TO RESCHEDULE INITIAL SCHEDULING CONFERENCE AND TO CONDUCT CONFERENCE BY TELEPHONE (DKT. 38 ) by Judge John A. Kronstadt: Based on a review of the parties' "Stipulation and [Proposed] Order to Reschedule Initial Scheduling Conference and to Conduct Conference by Telephone" (the "Stipulation" (Dkt. 38 )), it has been determined that the hearing on December 14, 2020 is not necessary. Upon the filing of the Joint Rule 16(b)/26(f) Report, the Scheduling Conference will be taken off calendar and under submission. No appearance by counsel is necessary. Based on a review of the Joint Rule 16(b)/26(f) Report, a separate order will issue setting the deadlines and dates for this action. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (jaklc2) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 11/19/2020) (0) |
| Nov 10, 2020 | 38 | STIPULATION to Reschedule Initial Scheduling Conference and to Conduct Conference by Telephone filed by Defendant Apple Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration Heidi L. Keefe, # 2 Proposed Order)(Keefe, Heidi) (Entered: 11/10/2020) (0) |
| Nov 10, 2020 | 39 | REPLY In Support NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Strike ONE-E-WAYS INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS AND TO COMPEL SERVICE OF AMENDED INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS 24 filed by Defendant Apple Inc.. (Keefe, Heidi) (Entered: 11/10/2020) (12) |
| Oct 28, 2020 | 36 | MEMORANDUM in Opposition to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Strike ONE-E-WAYS INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS AND TO COMPEL SERVICE OF AMENDED INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS 24 filed by Plaintiff One-E-Way, Inc.. (Muehlhauser, Douglas) (Entered: 10/28/2020) (18) |
| Oct 28, 2020 | 37 | DECLARATION of Douglas G. Muehlhauser in opposition to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Strike ONE-E-WAYS INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS AND TO COMPEL SERVICE OF AMENDED INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS 24 filed by Plaintiff One-E-Way, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Exhibit 4, # 5 Exhibit 5, # 6 Exhibit 6, # 7 Exhibit 7)(Muehlhauser, Douglas) (Entered: 10/28/2020) (0) |
| Oct 19, 2020 | 35 | (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE MOTION TO CONTINUE DATE OF INITIAL SCHEDULING CONFERENCE (DKT. 25 ) by Judge John A. Kronstadt: Based on a review of Defendant's Motion to Continue Date of Initial Scheduling Conference (the "Motion" (Dkt. 25 )) and Plaintiff's Opposition to the Motion (the "Opposition" (Dkt. 33 )), limited good cause has been shown for the requested relief. Therefore, the Motion is GRANTED-IN-PART. The Rule 16(b)/26(f) scheduling conference that is currently set for November 16, 2020 is continued to December 14, 2020. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (jaklc2) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 10/19/2020) (0) |
| Oct 15, 2020 | 33 | MEMORANDUM in Opposition to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Continue DATE OF INITIAL SCHEDULING CONFERENCE from 11/16/2020 to 01/18/2021 25 filed by Plaintiff One-E-Way, Inc.. (Muehlhauser, Douglas) (Entered: 10/15/2020) (14) |
| Oct 15, 2020 | 34 | DECLARATION of Douglas G. Muehlhauser in opposition to NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Continue DATE OF INITIAL SCHEDULING CONFERENCE from 11/16/2020 to 01/18/2021 25 filed by Plaintiff One-E-Way, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Muehlhauser, Douglas) (Entered: 10/15/2020) (0) |
| Oct 12, 2020 | 29 | (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER RE MOTION TO CONTINUE DATE OF INITIAL SCHEDULING CONFERENCE (DKT. 25 ) by Judge John A. Kronstadt: Based on a review of the Motion to Continue Date of Initial Scheduling Conference (the "Motion" (Dkt. 25 )), the requested relief should have been sought through an ex parte application in light of the relevant deadlines. However, to facilitate judicial and party efficiency, the Motion is construed as such an application. Plaintiff shall file any opposition, or a statement of non-opposition, on or before October 15, 2020. No reply is necessary. Upon the filing of any opposition or statement of non-opposition, the matter will be taken under submission. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (jaklc2) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 10/12/2020) (0) |
| Oct 12, 2020 | 30 | (IN CHAMBERS) ORDER CONTINUING DEFENDANTS MOTION TO STRIKE ONE-E-WAY'S INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS AND TO COMPEL SERVICE OF AMENDED INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS (DKT. 24)] by Judge John A Kronstadt: Apple Inc. has set the motion for a day the Court's calendar is full and, therefore, closed. Counsel are directed to refer to the Motion Calendar under this Courts Procedures and Schedules found on the website for the United States District Court. Any future motion will be stricken for failing to set it on a date the Court is hearing motions. The Court, on its own motion, continues the Motion from November 9, 2020 to March 22, 2021 at 8:30 a.m. Counsel shall refer to the Courts Standing Order with respect to the briefing schedule of motions. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (vv) (Entered: 10/12/2020) (0) |
| Oct 12, 2020 | 31 | ORDER by Judge John A. Kronstadt granting 27 Non-Resident Attorney Phillip E Morton APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Apple Inc., designating Bobby A Ghajar as local counsel. (jp). Modified on 10/13/2020 (jp). (Entered: 10/13/2020) (1) |
| Oct 12, 2020 | 32 | ORDER by Judge John A. Kronstadt granting 28 Non-Resident Attorney Erik B Milch APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Apple Inc., designating Bobby A Ghajar as local counsel. (jp) (Entered: 10/13/2020) (1) |
| Oct 9, 2020 | 26 | NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Bobby A Ghajar on behalf of Defendant Apple Inc. (Attorney Bobby A Ghajar added to party Apple Inc.(pty:dft))(Ghajar, Bobby) (Entered: 10/09/2020) (2) |
| Oct 9, 2020 | 27 | APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Phillip E. Morton to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Apple Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-28465393) filed by Defendant Apple Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order) (Ghajar, Bobby) (Entered: 10/09/2020) (0) |
| Oct 9, 2020 | 28 | APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Erik B. Milch to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Apple Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $500 Fee Paid, Receipt No. ACACDC-28465660) filed by Defendant Apple Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order) (Ghajar, Bobby) (Entered: 10/09/2020) (0) |
| Oct 7, 2020 | 24 | NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Strike ONE-E-WAYS INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS AND TO COMPEL SERVICE OF AMENDED INFRINGEMENT CONTENTIONS filed by Defendant Apple Inc.. Motion set for hearing on 11/9/2020 at 08:30 AM before Judge John A. Kronstadt. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration Lowell D. Mead, # 2 Exhibit A, # 3 Exhibit B, # 4 Exhibit C, # 5 Exhibit D, # 6 Exhibit E, # 7 Exhibit F) (Keefe, Heidi) (Entered: 10/07/2020) (0) |
| Oct 7, 2020 | 25 | NOTICE OF MOTION AND MOTION to Continue DATE OF INITIAL SCHEDULING CONFERENCE from 11/16/2020 to 01/18/2021 filed by Defendant Apple Inc.. Motion set for hearing on 11/9/2020 at 08:30 AM before Judge John A. Kronstadt. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration Lowell D. Mead) (Keefe, Heidi) (Entered: 10/07/2020) (0) |
| Sep 29, 2020 | 23 | ANSWER to Amended Complaint/Petition, 22 with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendant Apple Inc..(Keefe, Heidi) (Entered: 09/29/2020) (17) |
| Sep 15, 2020 | 22 | SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendant Apple Inc. amending Amended Complaint/Petition, 16 , filed by Plaintiff One-E-Way, Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Exhibit 3, # 4 Appendix Redline version of amended pleading)(Muehlhauser, Douglas) (Entered: 09/15/2020) (0) |
| Sep 15, 2020 | 22 | Complaint* (1) |
| Sep 3, 2020 | 20 | NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Phillip E Morton. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (jp) (Entered: 09/03/2020) (1) |
| Sep 3, 2020 | 21 | NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Erik B Milch. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (jp) (Entered: 09/03/2020) (1) |
| Sep 1, 2020 | 19 | ORDER SETTING RULE 16(b)/26(f) SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Counsel shall file a Joint Report consistent with this Order. Rule 26 Meeting Report due by 11/6/2020. (vv) (Entered: 09/01/2020) (15) |
| Aug 31, 2020 | 17 | ANSWER to Amended Complaint/Petition, 16 with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendant Apple Inc..(Keefe, Heidi) (Entered: 08/31/2020) (14) |
| Aug 31, 2020 | 18 | CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Defendant Apple Inc., (Keefe, Heidi) (Entered: 08/31/2020) (1) |
| Aug 17, 2020 | 15 | ORDER RE STIPULATION TO FILE FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT (DKT. 13 ) by Judge John A. Kronstadt, the Stipulation is APPROVED. Plaintiff shall file its First Amended Complaint on or before 8/20/2020. (jp) (Entered: 08/17/2020) (2) |
| Aug 17, 2020 | 16 | FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against Defendant Apple Inc. amending Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) 1 , filed by Plaintiff One-E-Way, Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1 - U.S. Patent No. 8,131,391, # 2 Exhibit 2 - U.S. Patent No. 10,468,047)(Muehlhauser, Douglas) (Entered: 08/17/2020) (0) |
| Aug 17, 2020 | 16 | Complaint* (1) |
| Aug 14, 2020 | 13 | STIPULATION to AMEND Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) 1 filed by Plaintiff One-E-Way, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed First Amended Complaint [redline], # 2 Proposed Order)(Muehlhauser, Douglas) (Entered: 08/14/2020) (0) |
| Aug 14, 2020 | 14 | NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Lowell D Mead on behalf of Defendant Apple Inc. (Attorney Lowell D Mead added to party Apple Inc.(pty:dft))(Mead, Lowell) (Entered: 08/14/2020) (2) |
| Aug 6, 2020 | 12 | STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Apple Inc. answer now due 8/17/2020, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) 1 filed by Plaintiff One-E-Way, Inc..(Muehlhauser, Douglas) (Entered: 08/06/2020) (2) |
| Jul 23, 2020 | 11 | PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff One-E-Way, Inc., upon Defendant Apple Inc. served on 7/17/2020, answer due 8/7/2020. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Jesse Gastelum c/o CT Corporation System, Registered Agent in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons NOT returned. (LeMeilleur, Payson) (Entered: 07/23/2020) (3) |
| Jul 22, 2020 | 10 | STANDING ORDERS FOR CIVIL CASES ASSIGNED TO JUDGE JOHN A. KRONSTADT upon filing of the complaint by Judge John A. Kronstadt. Please read each Order carefully as they differ in some respects from the Local Rules. Counsel are advised that the Court, at any time, may amend one or more of its Standing Orders. It is the responsibility of counsel to refer to this Court's Procedures and Schedules found on the website for the United States District Court, Central District of California (www.cacd.uscourts.gov) to obtain the operative order. The Court thanks the parties and their counsel for their anticipated cooperation in carrying out these requirements. (cw) (Entered: 07/22/2020) (30) |
| Jul 17, 2020 | 9 | NOTICE AND ORDER REGARDING TRANSFER AND/OR REASSIGNMENT OF PATENT CASE by Judge Dale S. Fischer. Case transferred from Judge Dale S. Fischer to Judge John A. Kronstadt for all further proceedings. Case number now reads 2:20-cv-06339 JAK(PDx). (rn) (Entered: 07/17/2020) (1) |
| Jul 16, 2020 | 2 | CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff One-E-Way, Inc.. (Muehlhauser, Douglas) (Entered: 07/16/2020) (3) |
| Jul 16, 2020 | 3 | Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) 1 filed by Plaintiff One-E-Way, Inc.. (Muehlhauser, Douglas) (Entered: 07/16/2020) (2) |
| Jul 16, 2020 | 4 | CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff One-E-Way, Inc., (Muehlhauser, Douglas) (Entered: 07/16/2020) (1) |
| Jul 16, 2020 | 5 | REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by One-E-Way, Inc.. (Muehlhauser, Douglas) (Entered: 07/16/2020) (1) |
| Jul 16, 2020 | 6 | NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dale S. Fischer and Magistrate Judge Patricia Donahue. (lh) (Entered: 07/16/2020) (1) |
| Jul 16, 2020 | 7 | NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (lh) (Entered: 07/16/2020) (2) |
| Jul 16, 2020 | 8 | 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening) 1 as to Defendant Apple Inc. (lh) (Entered: 07/16/2020) (2) |
| Jul 16, 2020 | 1 | Complaint* (1) |
