Palo Alto Networks, Inc. v. Finjan, Inc. > Summary
Court Case Number IPR2016-00151
Filing Date Nov 5, 2015
Institution Decision Date Apr 20, 2016
Decision Date Mar 15, 2017
Court Patent Trial and Appeal Board
Status FWD Entered
Appeal2017-2314
Administrative JudgesMiriam L. Quinn, Thomas L. Giannetti, Patrick M. Boucher
Judge Writing the Final DecisionMiriam L. Quinn
Claims Challenged in the Petition: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12
Claims Instituted: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12
Petitioner
Patent Owner
Petitioner Attorneys
10Palo Alto Networks
Attorney Name: Matthew I. Kreeger
Morrison & Foerster
Palo Alto Networks
Attorney Name: Jonathan Bockman
Morrison & Foerster
Palo Alto Networks
Attorney Name: Shouvik Biswas
Morrison & Foerster
Palo Alto Networks
Attorney Name: Nathaniel A. Hamstra
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan
Palo Alto Networks
Attorney Name: Nathaniel A. Hamstra
Morrison & Foerster
Palo Alto Networks
Attorney Name: Kristine Obrenovic
Morrison & Foerster
Palo Alto Networks
Attorney Name: Orion Armon
Cooley LLP
Palo Alto Networks
Attorney Name: Brian J. Eutermoser
Cooley LLP
Attorney Name: Kimberly Helenius
Attorney Name: David Nelson
Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan
Patent Owner Attorneys
5Finjan Holdings, Inc.
Attorney Name: Michael Kim
Finjan Holdings, Inc.
Finjan Holdings, Inc.
Attorney Name: James R. Hannah
Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel
Finjan Holdings, Inc.
Attorney Name: Jeffrey H. Price
Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel
Attorney Name: Daniel A. Crowe
Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner
Attorney Name: Joseph J. Richetti
Bryan Cave Leighton Paisner
Related Patents
| Doc No | Title | Issue date |
|---|---|---|
| 08141154 | System and method for inspecting dynamically generated executable code | Mar 20, 2012 |
