Panduit Corp. et al. v. Corning Optical Communications LLC > Summary
Court Case Number IPR2021-01562
Filing Date Oct 18, 2021
Institution Decision Date Apr 6, 2022
Decision Date Apr 6, 2022
Court Patent Trial and Appeal Board
Status Institution Denied
Administrative JudgesTerrence W. McMillin, Jennifer Meyer Chagnon, Charles J. Boudreau
Judge Writing the Final DecisionTerrence W. McMillin
Claims Challenged in the Petition: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 27, 28, 29, 30
Petitioner
Patent Owner
Petitioner Attorneys
6Panduit
Attorney Name: Kelly J. Eberspecher
Steptoe LLP
Panduit
Attorney Name: Katherine D. Cappaert
Steptoe LLP
Panduit
Attorney Name: Michael Joseph Rye
Cantor Colburn
Panduit
Attorney Name: Andrew C. Ryan
Cantor Colburn
Panduit
Attorney Name: Anna M. Targowska
Steptoe LLP
Panduit
Attorney Name: Thomas C. Yebernetsky
Steptoe LLP
Patent Owner Attorneys
9Corning Optical Communications
Attorney Name: Kristina Caggiano Kelly
Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox
Corning Optical Communications
Attorney Name: William H. Milliken
Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox
Corning Optical Communications
Attorney Name: Anthony M. Pettes
Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox
Corning Optical Communications
Attorney Name: Anupma Sahay
Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox
Corning Optical Communications
Attorney Name: John Thorne
Kellogg, Hansen, Todd, Figel & Frederick
Corning Optical Communications
Attorney Name: Evan T. Leo
Kellogg, Hansen, Todd, Figel & Frederick
Corning Optical Communications
Attorney Name: Gregory G. Rapawy
Kellogg, Hansen, Todd, Figel & Frederick
Corning Optical Communications
Attorney Name: Paul R. Prucnal
Sterne, Kessler, Goldstein & Fox
Related Patents
| Doc No | Title | Issue date |
|---|---|---|
| 10444456 | High density and bandwidth fiber optic apparatuses and related equipment and methods | Oct 15, 2019 |
