Panduit Corp. v. CCS Technology, Inc. > Summary
Court Case Number IPR2017-01074
Filing Date Mar 10, 2017
Institution Decision Date Oct 2, 2017
Decision Date Oct 1, 2018
Court Patent Trial and Appeal Board
Status FWD Entered
Appeal2019-1248
Administrative JudgesJohn A. Hudalla, Jennifer S. Bisk, Daniel J. Galligan
Judge Writing the Final DecisionJohn A. Hudalla
Claims Challenged in the Petition: 15, 16, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 49, 50, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 71
Claims Instituted: 15, 16, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 49, 50, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 71
Claims Invalidated: 15, 16, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 49, 50, 63, 64, 65, 66, 67, 68, 71
Petitioner
Patent Owner
Petitioner Attorneys
7Panduit
Attorney Name: Nathan P. Sportel
Husch Blackwell LLP
Panduit
Attorney Name: John Thaddeus Pienkos
Husch Blackwell LLP
Panduit
Attorney Name: Kelly J. Eberspecher
Husch Blackwell LLP
Panduit
Attorney Name: David L. Hecht
Steptoe LLP
Panduit
Attorney Name: Daniel S. Stringfield
Steptoe LLP
Panduit
Attorney Name: Katherine D. Cappaert
Steptoe LLP
Panduit
Attorney Name: Casimer Decusatis
Husch Blackwell LLP
Patent Owner Attorneys
6CCS Technology Inc.
Attorney Name: George W. Foster
Kirkland & Ellis
CCS Technology Inc.
Attorney Name: Eugene Goryunov
Kirkland & Ellis
CCS Technology Inc.
Attorney Name: Eric D. Hayes
Kirkland & Ellis
CCS Technology Inc.
Attorney Name: Shaun Kelly
Kirkland & Ellis
CCS Technology Inc.
Attorney Name: Eric R. Pearson
Kirkland & Ellis
Corning Optical Communications
Attorney Name: Brandon Barnes
Corning Optical Communications
Related Patents
| Doc No | Title | Issue date |
|---|---|---|
| RE045482 | Optical fiber connector and associated methods of validating optical fiber continuity | Apr 21, 2015 |
