Qinetiq Limited v. Oclaro Inc. > Summary
Court Case Number 4:10-cv-00080
Filing Date Jan 6, 2010
Termination Date Dec 7, 2010
Court California Northern District Court
Status Dismissed - Settled
Plaintiff
Defendant
Plaintiff Attorneys
10QinetiQ
Attorney Name: James Blank
Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer
QinetiQ
Attorney Name: William S. Coats
Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer
QinetiQ
Attorney Name: Soumitra Deka
Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer
QinetiQ
Attorney Name: Stephen J. Elliott
Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer
QinetiQ
Attorney Name: Tzung-Lin Fu
Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer
QinetiQ
Attorney Name: Richard L. Horwitz
Potter Anderson & Corroon
QinetiQ
Attorney Name: Taryn Lam
Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer
QinetiQ
Attorney Name: David E. Moore
Potter Anderson & Corroon
QinetiQ
Attorney Name: Peter Edward Root
Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer
QinetiQ
Attorney Name: Jonathan M. Rotter
Arnold & Porter Kaye Scholer
Defendant Attorneys
7OCLARO (Lumentum)
Attorney Name: Orion Armon
Cooley LLP
OCLARO (Lumentum)
Attorney Name: Thomas J. Friel Jr.
Cooley LLP
OCLARO (Lumentum)
Attorney Name: Thomas C. Grimm
Morris Nichols Arsht & Tunnell
OCLARO (Lumentum)
Attorney Name: Carolyn V. Juarez
Cooley LLP
OCLARO (Lumentum)
Attorney Name: Carolyn V. Juarez
Cooley LLP
OCLARO (Lumentum)
Attorney Name: Melissa H. Keyes
Cooley LLP
OCLARO (Lumentum)
Attorney Name: Wayne O. Stacy
Cooley LLP
Cause
35:271 Patent Infringement
Related Patents
| Doc No | Title | Issue date |
|---|---|---|
| 05428698 | Signal routing device | Jun 27, 1995 |
| 05410625 | Optical device for beam splitting and recombining | Apr 25, 1995 |
