Qualcomm Incorporated v. ParkerVision, Inc. > Summary
Court Case Number IPR2015-01828
Filing Date Aug 28, 2015
Institution Decision Date Mar 8, 2016
Decision Date Mar 7, 2017
Court Patent Trial and Appeal Board
Status FWD Entered
Appeal2017-2012
Administrative JudgesChristopher L. Crumbley, Bart A. Gerstenblith, Jason J. Chung
Judge Writing the Final DecisionChristopher L. Crumbley
Claims Challenged in the Petition: 21, 25, 26, 281, 283, 284, 285, 286, 288, 289, 293, 363, 364, 365, 366, 368, 369, 373
Claims Instituted: 21, 25, 26, 281, 283, 284, 285, 286, 288, 289, 293, 363, 364, 365, 366, 368, 369, 373
Petitioner
Patent Owner
Petitioner Attorneys
6Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Attorney Name: Orion Armon
Cooley LLP
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Attorney Name: Eamonn J. Gardner
Cooley LLP
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Attorney Name: Matthew J. Brigham
Cooley LLP
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Attorney Name: Timothy S. Teter
Cooley LLP
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Attorney Name: James Arthur Bolling
Smith Hulsey & Busey
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Attorney Name: Stephen D. Busey
Smith Hulsey & Busey
Patent Owner Attorneys
13ParkerVision
Attorney Name: Michael J. McNamara
Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
ParkerVision
Attorney Name: Michael T. Renaud
Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
ParkerVision
Attorney Name: Thomas Forrest Presson
ParkerVision
ParkerVision
Attorney Name: Douglas A. Cawley
McKool Smith
ParkerVision
Attorney Name: Richard A. Kamprath
McKool Smith
ParkerVision
Attorney Name: Jennifer A. Albert
McKool Smith
ParkerVision
Attorney Name: Joshua Budwin
McKool Smith
ParkerVision
Attorney Name: Kevin L. Burgess
McKool Smith
ParkerVision
Attorney Name: Mario A. Apreotesi
McKool Smith
ParkerVision
Attorney Name: Leah Bhimani Buratti
McKool Smith
ParkerVision
Attorney Name: Kathy H. Li
McKool Smith
ParkerVision
Attorney Name: Puneet Kohli
McKool Smith
Related Patents
Doc No | Title | Issue date |
---|---|---|
06091940 | Method and system for frequency up-conversion | Jul 18, 2000 |