Qualcomm Incorporated v. ParkerVision, Inc. > Summary
Court Case Number IPR2015-01834
Filing Date Aug 28, 2015
Institution Decision Date Mar 8, 2016
Decision Date Mar 7, 2017
Court Patent Trial and Appeal Board
Status FWD Entered
Administrative JudgesBart A. Gerstenblith, Christopher L. Crumbley, Jason J. Chung
Judge Writing the Final DecisionBart A. Gerstenblith
Claims Challenged in the Petition: 21, 25, 26, 281, 283, 284, 285, 286, 288, 289, 293, 363, 364, 365, 366, 368, 369, 373
Claims Instituted: 21, 25, 26, 281, 283, 284, 285, 286, 288, 289, 293, 363, 364, 365, 366, 368, 369, 373
Petitioner
Patent Owner
Petitioner Attorneys
6Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Attorney Name: Eamonn J. Gardner
Cooley LLP
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Attorney Name: Orion Armon
Cooley LLP
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Attorney Name: Matthew J. Brigham
Cooley LLP
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Attorney Name: Timothy S. Teter
Cooley LLP
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Attorney Name: James Arthur Bolling
Smith Hulsey & Busey
Qualcomm Technologies, Inc.
Attorney Name: Stephen D. Busey
Smith Hulsey & Busey
Patent Owner Attorneys
13ParkerVision
Attorney Name: Michael J. McNamara
Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
ParkerVision
Attorney Name: Michael T. Renaud
Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
ParkerVision
Attorney Name: Thomas Forrest Presson
ParkerVision
ParkerVision
Attorney Name: Douglas A. Cawley
McKool Smith
ParkerVision
Attorney Name: Richard A. Kamprath
McKool Smith
ParkerVision
Attorney Name: Jennifer A. Albert
McKool Smith
ParkerVision
Attorney Name: Joshua Budwin
McKool Smith
ParkerVision
Attorney Name: Kevin L. Burgess
McKool Smith
ParkerVision
Attorney Name: Mario A. Apreotesi
McKool Smith
ParkerVision
Attorney Name: Leah Bhimani Buratti
McKool Smith
ParkerVision
Attorney Name: Kathy H. Li
McKool Smith
ParkerVision
Attorney Name: Puneet Kohli
McKool Smith
Related Patents
Doc No | Title | Issue date |
---|---|---|
06091940 | Method and system for frequency up-conversion | Jul 18, 2000 |