RPX Corporation v. Iridescent Networks, Inc. > Summary
Court Case Number IPR2017-01661
Filing Date Jun 22, 2017
Institution Decision Date Dec 13, 2017
Decision Date Dec 10, 2018
Court Patent Trial and Appeal Board
Status FWD Entered
Appeal2019-1386
Administrative JudgesScott B. Howard, Matthew R. Clements, Thomas L. Giannetti
Judge Writing the Final DecisionScott B. Howard
Claims Challenged in the Petition: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16
Claims Instituted: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16
Claims Invalidated: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16
Petitioner
Patent Owner
Petitioner Attorneys
6RPX Corporation
Attorney Name: Andrew Lowes
Haynes and Boone, LLP
RPX Corporation
Attorney Name: Adam C. Fowles
Haynes and Boone, LLP
RPX Corporation
Attorney Name: Russ Emerson
Haynes and Boone, LLP
RPX Corporation
Attorney Name: Clint S. Wilkins
Haynes and Boone, LLP
Attorney Name: Andrew Lowes
Haynes and Boone, LLP
RPX Corporation
Attorney Name: Narasimha Reddy
Haynes and Boone, LLP
Patent Owner Attorneys
8Iridescent Networks
Attorney Name: Andrew W. Schultz
Troutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders LLP
Iridescent Networks
Attorney Name: Thomas J. Engellenner
Troutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders LLP
Iridescent Networks
Attorney Name: Reza Mollaaghababa
Troutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders LLP
Attorney Name: Robert R. Brunelli
Sheridan Ross
Attorney Name: Jason H. Vick
Sheridan Ross
Attorney Name: Thomas J. Engellenner
Troutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders LLP
Iridescent Networks
Attorney Name: Jacob Sharony
Troutman Pepper Hamilton Sanders LLP
Related Patents
Doc No | Title | Issue date |
---|---|---|
08036119 | System and method of providing bandwidth on demand | Oct 11, 2011 |