Roku, Inc. v. Intent IQ, LLC > Summary
Court Case Number IPR2022-00960
Filing Date May 13, 2022
Institution Decision Date Nov 29, 2022
Decision Date Nov 29, 2022
Court Patent Trial and Appeal Board
Status Institution Denied
Administrative JudgesMiriam L. Quinn, Kristen L. Droesch, Scott B. Howard
Judge Writing the Final DecisionMiriam L. Quinn
Claims Challenged in the Petition: 1, 3, 4, 5, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 26, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33
Petitioner
Patent Owner
Petitioner Attorneys
5Roku
Attorney Name: Hong Shi
Haynes and Boone, LLP
Roku
Attorney Name: David W. O'Brien
Haynes and Boone, LLP
Roku
Attorney Name: Jonathan R. Bowser
Haynes and Boone, LLP
Roku
Attorney Name: Raghav Bajaj
Haynes and Boone, LLP
Roku
Attorney Name: Samrat Bhattacharjee
Haynes and Boone, LLP
Patent Owner Attorneys
3Intent IQ, LLC
Attorney Name: Reza Mirzaie
Russ August & Kabat
Intent IQ, LLC
Attorney Name: Jonathan D. Link
Russ August & Kabat
Intent IQ, LLC
Attorney Name: Benjamin T. Wang
Russ August & Kabat
Related Patents
| Doc No | Title | Issue date |
|---|---|---|
| 10321198 | Systems and methods for dealing with online activity based on delivery of a television advertisement | Jun 11, 2019 |
