Search
Patexia Research
Case number 2:19-cv-02515

SRK Technology LLC v. Snap, Inc. > Documents

Date Field Doc. No.Description (Pages)
Jun 12, 2020 58 Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel: for attorney Sarah Gabrielle Hartman counsel for Plaintiff SRK Technology LLC. Lawrence C. Drucker is no longer counsel of record for the aforementioned party in this case for the reason indicated in the G-123 Notice. Filed by Plaintiff Sarah G. Hartman. (Hartman, Sarah) (Entered: 06/12/2020) (2)
Apr 23, 2020 57 TRANSCRIPT ORDER as to Plaintiff SRK Technology LLC for Court Reporter. Court will contact Casey Suda at csuda@brownrudnick.com with further instructions regarding this order. Transcript preparation will not begin until payment has been satisfied with the court reporter. (Hartman, Sarah) (Entered: 04/23/2020) (1)
Apr 22, 2020 56 REPORT ON THE DETERMINATION OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or Trademark. (Closing) (bm) (Entered: 04/22/2020) (3)
Apr 22, 2020 55 ORDER REGARDING JOINT STIPULATION TO STAY CASE PENDING INTER PARTIES REVIEW by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez, re Stipulation to Stay Case 54 : The case is administratively closed and may be reopened by application of any party. (see document for further details) (Made JS-6. Case Terminated.) (bm) (Entered: 04/22/2020) (2)
Apr 21, 2020 54 Joint STIPULATION to Stay Case pending Inter Partes Review filed by Defendant Snap, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Chen, Reuben) (Entered: 04/21/2020) (0)
Apr 6, 2020 53 Joint Claim Construction Statement filed by Plaintiff SRK Technology LLC (Attachments: # 1 Appendix A - Proposed Constructions Chart)(Hartman, Sarah) (Entered: 04/06/2020) (0)
Apr 3, 2020 52 ORDER REGARDING EXTENSION TO FILE CLAIM CONSTRUCTION OPENING BRIEFS by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez, re Stipulation 51 : Having considered the Parties' Joint Stipulation Regarding Extension to File Claim Construction Opening Briefs, filed concurrently herewith, the Court hereby orders that the deadline for the Parties to file Opening Claim Construction briefs be extended from April 17, 2020 to and including May 8, 2020. (bm) (Entered: 04/03/2020) (2)
Mar 27, 2020 51 Joint STIPULATION for Extension of Time to File Opening Claim Construction Briefs filed by Plaintiff SRK Technology LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Hartman, Sarah) (Entered: 03/27/2020) (0)
Feb 13, 2020 50 ORDER by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez granting 49 Non-Resident Attorney Dustin M Knight APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant SNAP Inc., designating Reuben H Chen as local counsel. (bm) (Entered: 02/13/2020) (1)
Feb 10, 2020 49 Corrected APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Dustin M. Knight to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Snap, Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400.00 Previously Paid on 2/10/2020, Receipt No. 0973-25289867) filed by Defendant Snap, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order) (Chen, Reuben) (Entered: 02/10/2020) (0)
Feb 10, 2020 48 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Dustin M. Knight to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Defendant Snap, Inc. (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Fee Paid, Receipt No. 0973-25289867) filed by Defendant Snap, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order) (Chen, Reuben) (Entered: 02/10/2020) (0)
Jan 23, 2020 47 STIPULATED PROTECTIVE ORDER by Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth: re Stipulation for Protective Order 45 . (sbou) (Entered: 01/24/2020) (32)
Jan 22, 2020 46 AMENDED DOCUMENT filed by Plaintiff SRK Technology LLC. Amendment to Stipulation for Protective Order 45 (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order Stipulated Protective Order)(Hartman, Sarah) (Entered: 01/22/2020) (0)
Jan 17, 2020 45 Joint STIPULATION for Protective Order filed by Plaintiff SRK Technology LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order Stipulated Protective Order)(Hartman, Sarah) (Entered: 01/17/2020) (0)
Dec 10, 2019 44 ORDER by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez: granting 43 Non-Resident Attorney Alessandra C Messing APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff SRK Technology LLC, designating Sarah G Hartman as local counsel. (bm) (Entered: 12/11/2019) (1)
Dec 6, 2019 43 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Alessandra Carcaterra Messing to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff SRK Technology LLC (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Fee Paid, Receipt No. 0973-24909679) filed by Plaintiff SRK Technology LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order) (Hartman, Sarah) (Entered: 12/06/2019) (0)
Nov 20, 2019 42 MINUTE ORDER (In Chambers): SETTING DATES by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez: The Court sets the following dates. Please review the Court's trial order for further details. Last Day to Add Parties and Amend Pleadings (Doe defendants are dismissed as of cut-off to add parties): 12/31/19; Claim Construction Opening Brief: 04/17/20; Claim Construction Responsive Brief: 06/05/20; Hearing on Claim Construction (1:30 p.m.) 07/20/20 -Tuesday; Discovery Cut-Off: 01/19/21; Last Day to File Motion: 02/02/21; Opening Expert Witness Disclosure [See F.R.Civ.P. 26(a)(2)]: 01/26/21; Rebuttal Expert Witness Disclosure: 02/23/21; Expert Discovery Cut-Off: 03/23/21; Final Pretrial Conference (2:30 p.m.): 04/12/21; Jury Trial (9:00 a.m.): 04/27/21, Estimated Length: 5 days. (bm) (Entered: 11/20/2019) (1)
Nov 20, 2019 40 ORDER FOR JURY TRIAL by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. Final Pretrial Conference set for 4/12/2021 02:30 PM. Jury Trial set for 4/27/2021 09:00 AM. (wm) (Entered: 11/20/2019) (9)
Nov 19, 2019 41 ORDER/REFERRAL to ADR Procedure No 3 by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. Case ordered to a private mediator based upon a stipulation of the parties or by the court order. ADR Proceeding to be held no later than 02/26/21. (wm) (Entered: 11/20/2019) (1)
Nov 18, 2019 39 MINUTES OF SCHEDULING CONFERENCE held before Judge Philip S. Gutierrez: The Court, having read and considered the report and having heard from counsel today, advises that dates will be set by separate order. Court Reporter: Debbie Hino-Spaan. (bm) (Entered: 11/20/2019) (1)
Nov 8, 2019 38 REQUEST for ADR Procedure No. 3. Parties request for private mediation. Filed by Plaintiff SRK Technology LLC(Hartman, Sarah) (Entered: 11/08/2019) (2)
Nov 8, 2019 37 JOINT REPORT Rule 26(f) Discovery Plan ; estimated length of trial 5-8 days, filed by Plaintiff SRK Technology LLC.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A)(Hartman, Sarah) (Entered: 11/08/2019) (0)
Aug 23, 2019 36 TEXT ONLY ENTRY (In Chambers) by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez : On the Court's own motion, the 32 Scheduling Conference is ADVANCED to 11/18/2019 at 2pm. THERE IS NO PDF DOCUMENT ASSOCIATED WITH THIS ENTRY. (wm) TEXT ONLY ENTRY (Entered: 08/23/2019) (0)
Aug 5, 2019 35 NOTICE of Change of address by Sarah Gabrielle Hartman attorney for Plaintiff SRK Technology LLC. Changing attorneys address to 2211 Michelson Drive, Seventh Floor, Irvine, California 92612. Filed by Plaintiff SRK Technology LLC. (Hartman, Sarah) (Entered: 08/05/2019) (2)
Jun 5, 2019 34 NOTICE TO FILER OF DEFICIENCIES in Electronically Filed Documents RE: Notice of Appearance 33 . The following error(s) was/were found: Incorrect event selected. Correct event to be used is: Notice of Appearance or Withdrawal of Counsel G123. In response to this notice, the Court may: (1) order an amended or correct document to be filed; (2) order the document stricken; or (3) take other action as the Court deems appropriate. You need not take any action in response to this notice unless and until the Court directs you to do so. (ak) (Entered: 06/05/2019) (1)
Jun 4, 2019 33 NOTICE of Appearance filed by attorney Benjamin S Lin on behalf of Defendant Snap, Inc. (Attorney Benjamin S Lin added to party Snap, Inc.(pty:dft))(Lin, Benjamin) (Entered: 06/04/2019) (2)
May 29, 2019 31 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT filed by Defendant Snap, Inc. (Chen, Reuben) (Entered: 05/29/2019) (2)
May 29, 2019 30 ANSWER to Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), 1 with JURY DEMAND filed by Defendant Snap, Inc..(Chen, Reuben) (Entered: 05/29/2019) (7)
May 29, 2019 32 ORDER SETTING SCHEDULING CONFERENCE by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. Scheduling Conference set for 1/27/2020 at 02:00 PM. (wm) (Entered: 05/29/2019) (1)
May 14, 2019 29 ORDER REGARDING EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND TO INITIAL COMPLAINT BY 30 DAYS, AND DISCHARGE OF ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE granting Stipulation Extending Time to Answer 19 , by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez: Having considered the parties' joint response to the Order To Show Cause Re Lack of Prosecution (Dkt. 27), and Joint Stipulation to Extend Defendant's Time to Respond to the Initial Complaint by 30 Days (L.R. 8-3) (Dkt. 19), the Court hereby orders and confirms that the deadline for Snap to respond to the complaint is May 29, 2019, and that the Order To Show Cause Re Lack of Prosecution is discharged. (bm) (Entered: 05/17/2019) (2)
May 9, 2019 28 RESPONSE filed by Defendant Snap, Inc.to Order to Show Cause 27 [Joint] (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order)(Chen, Reuben) (Entered: 05/09/2019) (0)
May 3, 2019 27 ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE RE LACK OF PROSECUTION by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. Response to Order to Show Cause due by 5/17/2019. (wm) (Entered: 05/03/2019) (1)
May 2, 2019 26 ORDER by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez: granting 16 Non-Resident Attorney Enrique W Iturralde APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff SRK Technology LLC, designating Arjun Sivakumar as local counsel. (bm) (Entered: 05/03/2019) (1)
May 2, 2019 25 ORDER by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez: granting 17 Non-Resident Attorney Vincent J Rubino III APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff SRK Technology LLC, designating Arjun Sivakumar as local counsel. (bm) (Entered: 05/03/2019) (1)
May 2, 2019 24 ORDER by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez: granting 18 Non-Resident Attorney Lawrence C Drucker APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff SRK Technology LLC, designating Arjun Sivakumar as local counsel. (bm) (Entered: 05/03/2019) (1)
May 2, 2019 23 ORDER by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez: granting 21 Non-Resident Attorney Alfred R Fabricant APPLICATION to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff SRK Technology LLC, designating Arjun Sivakumar as local counsel. (bm) (Entered: 05/03/2019) (1)
May 1, 2019 22 STANDING ORDER REGARDING NEWLY ASSIGNED CASES by Judge Philip S. Gutierrez. (ji) (Entered: 05/01/2019) (11)
Apr 30, 2019 21 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Alfred R. Fabricant to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff SRK Technology LLC (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Fee Paid, Receipt No. 0973-23648455) filed by Plaintiff SRK Technology LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order) (Sivakumar, Arjun) (Entered: 04/30/2019) (0)
Apr 29, 2019 20 ORDER RETURNING CASE FOR REASSIGNMENT by Judge Dean D. Pregerson. ORDER case returned to the Clerk for random reassignment pursuant to General Order 19-03. Case randomly reassigned from Judge Dean D. Pregerson to Judge Philip S. Gutierrez for all further proceedings. The case number will now reflect the initials of the transferee Judge 2:19-cv-02515 PSG(JPRx). (rn) (Entered: 04/30/2019) (1)
Apr 25, 2019 19 Joint STIPULATION Extending Time to Answer the complaint as to Snap, Inc. answer now due 5/29/2019, re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), 1 filed by Defendant Snap, Inc..(Attorney Reuben H Chen added to party Snap, Inc.(pty:dft))(Chen, Reuben) (Entered: 04/25/2019) (3)
Apr 23, 2019 18 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Lawrence C. Drucker to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff SRK Technology LLC (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Fee Paid, Receipt No. 0973-23603697) filed by Plaintiff SRK Technology LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order of Non-Resident Attorney to Appear in a Specific Case Pro Hac Vice) (Sivakumar, Arjun) (Entered: 04/23/2019) (0)
Apr 18, 2019 17 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Vincent J. Rubino, III to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff SRK Technology LLC (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Fee Paid, Receipt No. 0973-23576818) filed by plaintiff SRK Technology LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order) (Sivakumar, Arjun) (Entered: 04/18/2019) (0)
Apr 18, 2019 16 APPLICATION of Non-Resident Attorney Enrique W. Iturralde to Appear Pro Hac Vice on behalf of Plaintiff SRK Technology LLC (Pro Hac Vice Fee - $400 Fee Paid, Receipt No. 0973-23576392) filed by plaintiff SRK Technology LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order) (Sivakumar, Arjun) (Entered: 04/18/2019) (0)
Apr 16, 2019 15 PROOF OF SERVICE Executed by Plaintiff SRK Technology LLC, upon Defendant Snap, Inc. served on 4/8/2019, answer due 4/29/2019. Service of the Summons and Complaint were executed upon Corporation Service Company, Becky DeGeorge, Authorized Agent in compliance with Federal Rules of Civil Procedure by service on a domestic corporation, unincorporated association, or public entity.Original Summons NOT returned. (Hartman, Sarah) (Entered: 04/16/2019) (4)
Apr 4, 2019 14 21 DAY Summons Issued re Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), 1 as to Defendant Snap, Inc. (shb) (Entered: 04/04/2019) (2)
Apr 4, 2019 13 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), 1 filed by Plaintiff SRK Technology LLC. (Hartman, Sarah) (Entered: 04/04/2019) (2)
Apr 4, 2019 12 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Enrique W Iturralde. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (et) (Entered: 04/04/2019) (1)
Apr 4, 2019 11 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Vincent J Rubino, III. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (et) (Entered: 04/04/2019) (1)
Apr 4, 2019 10 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Lawrence Drucker. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (et) (Entered: 04/04/2019) (1)
Apr 4, 2019 9 NOTICE OF PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION DUE for Non-Resident Attorney Alfred R Fabricant. A document recently filed in this case lists you as an out-of-state attorney of record. However, the Court has not been able to locate any record that you are admitted to the Bar of this Court, and you have not filed an application to appear Pro Hac Vice in this case. Accordingly, within 5 business days of the date of this notice, you must either (1) have your local counsel file an application to appear Pro Hac Vice (Form G-64) and pay the applicable fee, or (2) complete the next section of this form and return it to the court at cacd_attyadm@cacd.uscourts.gov. You have been removed as counsel of record from the docket in this case, and you will not be added back to the docket until your Pro Hac Vice status has been resolved. (et) (Entered: 04/04/2019) (1)
Apr 4, 2019 8 NOTICE OF DEFICIENCIES in Request to Issue Summons RE: Summons Request 3 . The following error(s) was found: The caption of the summons must match the caption of the complaint verbatim. If the caption is too large to fit in the space provided, enter the name of the first party and then write see attached.Next, attach a face page of the complaint or a second page addendum to the Summons. The summons cannot be issued until this defect has been corrected. Please correct the defect and re-file your request. (et) (Entered: 04/04/2019) (2)
Apr 4, 2019 7 NOTICE TO PARTIES OF COURT-DIRECTED ADR PROGRAM filed. (et) (Entered: 04/04/2019) (2)
Apr 4, 2019 6 NOTICE OF ASSIGNMENT to District Judge Dean D. Pregerson and Magistrate Judge Jean P. Rosenbluth. (et) (Entered: 04/04/2019) (1)
Apr 3, 2019 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET filed by Plaintiff SRK Technology LLC. (Hartman, Sarah) (Entered: 04/03/2019) (3)
Apr 3, 2019 5 REPORT ON THE FILING OF AN ACTION Regarding a Patent or a Trademark (Initial Notification) filed by SRK Technology LLC. (Hartman, Sarah) (Entered: 04/03/2019) (1)
Apr 3, 2019 4 CERTIFICATE of Interested Parties filed by Plaintiff SRK Technology LLC, identifying Aawaaz Inc.. (Hartman, Sarah) (Entered: 04/03/2019) (2)
Apr 3, 2019 3 Request for Clerk to Issue Summons on Complaint (Attorney Civil Case Opening), 1 filed by Plaintiff SRK Technology LLC. (Hartman, Sarah) (Entered: 04/03/2019) (2)
Apr 3, 2019 1 Complaint* (1)
Menu