Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v. Lynk Labs, Inc. > Summary
Court Case Number IPR2022-00100
Filing Date Oct 28, 2021
Institution Decision Date Jun 9, 2022
Decision Date Jun 7, 2023
Court Patent Trial and Appeal Board
Status Final Written Decision
Administrative JudgesScott Raevsky, Jon B. Tornquist, Jennifer Meyer Chagnon
Judge Writing the Final DecisionScott Raevsky
Claims Challenged in the Petition: 8, 9, 10, 15, 16, 17, 18
Claims Instituted: 8, 9, 10, 15, 16, 17, 18
Petitioner
Patent Owner
Petitioner Attorneys
6Samsung Electronics
Attorney Name: Naveen Modi
Paul Hastings
Samsung Electronics
Attorney Name: Joseph E. Palys
Paul Hastings
Samsung Electronics
Attorney Name: Arvind Jairam
Paul Hastings
Samsung Electronics
Attorney Name: Howard Herr
Paul Hastings
Samsung Electronics
Attorney Name: Paul M. Anderson
Paul Hastings
Samsung Electronics
Attorney Name: Mark J. Consilvio
Paul Hastings
Patent Owner Attorneys
9Lynk Labs
Attorney Name: Jason A. Engel
K&L Gates
Lynk Labs
Attorney Name: Katherine L. Allor
K&L Gates
Lynk Labs
Attorney Name: Erik James Halverson
K&L Gates
Lynk Labs
Attorney Name: Dennis A. Majewski
K&L Gates
Lynk Labs
Attorney Name: James T. Carmichael
Carmichael IP
Lynk Labs
Attorney Name: Stephen T. Schreiner
Carmichael IP
Lynk Labs
Attorney Name: Stephen P. McBride
Carmichael IP
Lynk Labs
Attorney Name: Minghui Yang
Carmichael IP
Lynk Labs
Attorney Name: Peter W. Shackle
PHOTALUME INC.
Related Patents
Doc No | Title | Issue date |
---|---|---|
10750583 | AC light emitting diode and AC LED drive methods and apparatus | Aug 18, 2020 |