Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al. v. Nanoco Technologies Ltd. > Summary
Court Case Number IPR2021-00186
Filing Date Nov 9, 2020
Institution Decision Date May 19, 2021
Decision Date May 16, 2022
Court Patent Trial and Appeal Board
Status Final Written Decision
Appeal2022-1851
Administrative JudgesGrace Karaffa Obermann, Erica A. Franklin, Christopher M. Kaiser
Judge Writing the Final DecisionGrace Karaffa Obermann
Claims Challenged in the Petition: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23
Claims Instituted: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23
Petitioner
Patent Owner
Petitioner Attorneys
7Samsung Electronics
Attorney Name: Christopher Mizzo
Kirkland & Ellis
Samsung Electronics
Attorney Name: Gregory S. Arovas
Kirkland & Ellis
Samsung Electronics
Attorney Name: Stefan M. Miller
Kirkland & Ellis
Samsung Electronics
Attorney Name: Todd Baker
Kirkland & Ellis
Samsung Electronics
Attorney Name: Jeremy D. Wilson
Kirkland & Ellis
Samsung Electronics
Attorney Name: Stephen C. Desalvo
Kirkland & Ellis
Attorney Name: Christopher Mizzo
Kirkland & Ellis
Patent Owner Attorneys
6Nanoco Technologies
Attorney Name: William A. Meunier
Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
Nanoco Technologies
Attorney Name: Peter J. Cuomo
Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
Nanoco Technologies
Attorney Name: Michael C. Newman
Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
Nanoco Technologies
Attorney Name: Thomas H. Wintner
Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
Nanoco Technologies
Attorney Name: Matthew S. Galica
Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
Nanoco Technologies
Attorney Name: Brandi Cossairt
Mintz, Levin, Cohn, Ferris, Glovsky and Popeo, P.C.
Related Patents
| Doc No | Title | Issue date |
|---|---|---|
| 08524365 | Preparation of nanoparticle materials | Sep 3, 2013 |
