Case number 1:18-cv-00850
Satius Holding, Inc. v. Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. et al > Documents
| Date Field | Doc. No. | Description (Pages) |
|---|---|---|
| Sep 7, 2023 | 140 | Letter to The Honorable Christopher J. Burke from Adam W. Poff regarding Supplemental Claim Construction Briefing regarding Indefiniteness - re 139 Stipulation. (Poff, Adam) (Entered: 09/07/2023) (4) |
| Sep 7, 2023 | 141 | Letter to The Honorable Christopher J. Burke from Philip A. Rovner regarding Definiteness of Claim - re 139 Stipulation. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A-B)(Rovner, Philip) (Entered: 09/07/2023) (0) |
| Aug 28, 2023 | 139 | STIPULATION for Supplemental Letter Brief re Markman Hearing,, by Satius Holding, Inc.. (Rovner, Philip) (Entered: 08/28/2023) (2) |
| Aug 21, 2023 | 138 | ORAL ORDER: The Court, having reviewed the parties' August 11, 2023 letter, (D.I. 137), hereby ORDERS that the Court will ADOPT the parties' proposal as to the six terms to be argued at the upcoming Markman hearing, including Defendants' request that the Court hear argument on Term 5 and Term 4 together. The Court also ORDERS that the Markman hearing will be held in person in Courtroom 2A. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 8/21/2023. (mlc) (Entered: 08/21/2023) (0) |
| Aug 11, 2023 | 137 | Joint Letter to The Honorable Christopher J. Burke from Philip A. Rovner regarding the upcoming Markman hearing - re 134 Oral Order,,,. (Rovner, Philip) (Entered: 08/11/2023) (3) |
| Aug 8, 2023 | 136 | NOTICE OF SERVICE of Plaintiff Satius Holding Inc.'s 8/7/2023 Supplemental Objections and Response to Defendants' Interrogatory (No. 13) filed by Satius Holding, Inc..(Choa, Jonathan) (Entered: 08/08/2023) (2) |
| Aug 4, 2023 | 135 | Joint STATUS REPORT by Satius Holding, Inc.. (Rovner, Philip) (Entered: 08/04/2023) (2) |
| Aug 2, 2023 | 134 | ORAL ORDER: The Court hereby ORDERS as follows with respect to the upcoming Markman hearing: (1) The Court will adopt the parties' prior proposal with respect to the length and order of argument. (D.I. 83; D.I. 84; see also D.I. 106 at para. 14); (2) However, it has been the Court's recent practice to hear argument on only six terms/term sets ("terms"). So, by no later than August 11, 2023, the parties shall submit a joint letter telling the Court which terms will be taken on the papers and which six terms will be argued.; and (3) In the August 11, 2023 letter, the parties shall also tell the Court if there is joint agreement to hold the hearing via Microsoft Teams videoconference. If the parties are not in agreement, then the hearing will be held in person. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 8/2/2023. (dlb) (Entered: 08/02/2023) (0) |
| Jul 28, 2023 | 130 | REDACTED VERSION of 125 Appendix [Volume 1 of 3] by Satius Holding, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit U-1 - U-13)(Rovner, Philip) (Entered: 07/28/2023) (0) |
| Jul 28, 2023 | 131 | REDACTED VERSION of 126 Appendix [Volume 2 of 3] by Satius Holding, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit V-1 - V-9)(Rovner, Philip) (Entered: 07/28/2023) (0) |
| Jul 28, 2023 | 132 | REDACTED VERSION of 127 Appendix [Volume 3 of 3] by Satius Holding, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit W-1 - X-1)(Rovner, Philip) (Entered: 07/28/2023) (0) |
| Jul 28, 2023 | 133 | STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for the parties to submit a joint interim status report and for Plaintiff Satius Holding Inc. to serve its response to Defendants' initial invalidity contentions to August 4, 2023 and August 7, 2023 respectively - filed by Satius Holding, Inc.. (Rovner, Philip) (Entered: 07/28/2023) (2) |
| Jul 21, 2023 | 124 | Joint CLAIM CONSTRUCTION OPENING BRIEF filed by Satius Holding, Inc.. (Rovner, Philip) (Entered: 07/21/2023) (30) |
| Jul 21, 2023 | 125 | [SEALED] APPENDIX re 124 Claim Construction Opening Brief [Volume 1 of 3] by Satius Holding, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit U-1 - U-13)(Rovner, Philip) (Entered: 07/21/2023) (0) |
| Jul 21, 2023 | 126 | [SEALED] APPENDIX re 124 Claim Construction Opening Brief [Volume 2 of 3] by Satius Holding, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit V-1 - V-9)(Rovner, Philip) (Entered: 07/21/2023) (0) |
| Jul 21, 2023 | 127 | [SEALED] APPENDIX re 124 Claim Construction Opening Brief [Volume 3 of 3] by Satius Holding, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit W-1 - X-1)(Rovner, Philip) (Entered: 07/21/2023) (0) |
| Jul 21, 2023 | 128 | MOTION for Claim Construction - filed by Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.. Motions referred to Christopher J. Burke.(Poff, Adam) (Entered: 07/21/2023) (4) |
| Jul 21, 2023 | 129 | MOTION for Claim Construction - filed by Satius Holding, Inc.. Motions referred to Christopher J. Burke.(Rovner, Philip) (Entered: 07/21/2023) (1) |
| Jul 20, 2023 | 123 | ORAL ORDER: The Court hereby ORDERS that, by no later than the date the parties file their Joint Claim Construction Brief, the parties shall also each file a one-page "Motion for Claim Construction" that requests the Court to adopt the claim construction position(s) of that party set forth in the Joint Claim Construction Chart. The motion shall not contain any argument and shall simply state that the party "requests that the Court adopt the claim construction position[s] of [the party] set forth in the Joint Claim Construction Chart (D.I. [])." Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 7/20/2023. (dlb) (Entered: 07/20/2023) (0) |
| Jul 18, 2023 | 122 | ORAL ORDER: The Court, having a scheduling conflict with the August 3, 2023 Markman hearing, and having conferred with counsel for the parties regarding an alternative date, hereby ORDERS that the Markman hearing is RESCHEDULED to August 24, 2023 at 11:00 a.m. in Courtroom 2A. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 7/18/2023. (dlb) (Entered: 07/18/2023) (0) |
| Jul 11, 2023 | 121 | NOTICE OF SERVICE of Defendant Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics, Inc.'s Responsive Claim Construction Brief filed by Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd..(Poff, Adam) (Entered: 07/11/2023) (2) |
| Jul 10, 2023 | 120 | NOTICE OF SERVICE of Plaintiff Satius Holding Inc.'s Reply Claim Construction Brief with Exhibits W-1 through W-5 filed by Satius Holding, Inc..(Choa, Jonathan) (Entered: 07/10/2023) (2) |
| Jun 22, 2023 | 119 | NOTICE OF SERVICE of Samsung's Initial Invalidity Contentions filed by Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd..(Poff, Adam) (Entered: 06/22/2023) (2) |
| Jun 16, 2023 | 118 | NOTICE of Withdrawal of Alan R. Silverstein by Satius Holding, Inc. (Rovner, Philip) (Entered: 06/16/2023) (1) |
| Jun 15, 2023 | 117 | NOTICE OF SERVICE of Plaintiff Satius Holding Inc.'s Opening Claim Construction Brief with Exhibits U-1 through U-13 filed by Satius Holding, Inc..(Choa, Jonathan) (Entered: 06/15/2023) (2) |
| Jun 6, 2023 | 116 | NOTICE requesting Clerk to remove Greg Proctor as co-counsel. Reason for request: no longer with firm. (Rovner, Philip) (Entered: 06/06/2023) (2) |
| May 31, 2023 | 114 | MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Teresa T. Lewi and Ryan R. Roberts - filed by Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.. Motions referred to Christopher J. Burke.(Poff, Adam) (Entered: 05/31/2023) (6) |
| May 31, 2023 | 115 | CLAIM Construction Chart by Satius Holding, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A-R, # 2 Exhibit S-1 - T-7)(Rovner, Philip) (Entered: 05/31/2023) (0) |
| May 19, 2023 | 113 | NOTICE OF SERVICE of Supplemental Initial Disclosures of Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. filed by Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd..(Poff, Adam) (Entered: 05/19/2023) (2) |
| May 18, 2023 | 112 | NOTICE OF SERVICE of Plaintiff Satius Holding Inc.'s Initial Claim Charts [Highly Confidential - Outside Counsel's Eyes Only] filed by Satius Holding, Inc..(Choa, Jonathan) (Entered: 05/18/2023) (2) |
| Apr 11, 2023 | 111 | NOTICE OF SERVICE of 1) Samsung Defendants' Objections and Responses to Plaintiff Satius Holding, Inc.'s Second Set of Interrogatories (Nos. 10-12); and 2) Samsung Defendants' Objections and Responses to Plaintiff Satius Holding, Inc.'s Second Set of Requests for Production of Documents (Nos. 49-56) filed by Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd..(Poff, Adam) (Entered: 04/11/2023) (2) |
| Mar 17, 2023 | 110 | NOTICE OF SERVICE of Plaintiff Satius Holding Inc.'s Identification of Additional Accused Products and Corrected Supplemental Initial Disclosures Pursuant to Rule 26(a)(1) filed by Satius Holding, Inc..(Choa, Jonathan) (Entered: 03/17/2023) (2) |
| Mar 14, 2023 | 108 | NOTICE OF SERVICE of Plaintiff Satius Holding, Inc.'s Supplemental Initial Disclosures Pursuant to Rule 26(a)(1) filed by Satius Holding, Inc..(Choa, Jonathan) (Entered: 03/14/2023) (2) |
| Mar 14, 2023 | 109 | NOTICE OF SERVICE of Updated Initial Disclosures of Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. filed by Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd..(Poff, Adam) (Entered: 03/14/2023) (2) |
| Feb 28, 2023 | 106 | Revised SCHEDULING ORDER: Discovery due by 12/15/2023. Dispositive Motions due by 5/10/2024. Claim Construction Opening Brief due by 6/14/2023. Claim Construction Answering Brief due by 6/28/2023. Claim Construction Reply Brief due by 7/7/2023. Claim Construction Surreply Brief due by 7/14/2023. Joint Claim Construction Brief due by 7/21/2023. A Markman Hearing is set for 8/3/2023 at 11:00 AM in Courtroom 2A before Judge Christopher J. Burke. A Pretrial Conference is set for 12/9/2024 at 04:30 PM in Courtroom 4A before Judge Maryellen Noreika. A 5 day Jury Trial is set for 12/16/2024 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 4A before Judge Maryellen Noreika. Please see order for further details and deadlines. Signed by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 2/28/2023. (dlb) Modified on 2/28/2023 (dlb). (Entered: 02/28/2023) (17) |
| Feb 28, 2023 | 107 | MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Jared Frisch - filed by Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.. (Poff, Adam) (Entered: 02/28/2023) (5) |
| Feb 27, 2023 | 105 | PROPOSED ORDER [Proposed] Scheduling Order by Satius Holding, Inc.. (Rovner, Philip) (Entered: 02/27/2023) (17) |
| Feb 23, 2023 | 104 | ORAL ORDER: The Court, having reviewed the proposed Scheduling Order, (D.I. 101), and the parties' February 21, 2023 letters regarding the parties' dispute over the reduction of invalidity references, (D.I. 102; D.I. 103), hereby ORDERS as follows: (1) With regard to Section 13 of the proposed Scheduling Order, (D.I. 101 at 11), the parties shall utilize the language in Paragraph 13 of the Court's form Rule 16 Scheduling Order Patent, which requires the parties to file a joint claim construction brief in the matter set out therein. That joint claim construction brief shall be filed by no later than July 21, 2023.; (2) The hearing on claim construction will be held on August 3, 2023 at 11:00 a.m.; (3) The pretrial conference will be held on December 9, 2024 at 4:30 p.m. A five-day jury trial will begin on December 16, 2024.; (4) With regard to the parties' dispute regarding the reduction of invalidity references, the Court hereby ADOPTS Defendants' position. While the Court agrees with Plaintiff that it makes sense to have a narrowing of prior art references per patent claim prior to the deadline for final invalidity contentions, it agrees with Defendants that for the reasons they assert, (D.I. 103), the Court should consider narrowing proposals after a claim construction decision has issued.; and (5) By no later than February 27, 2023, the parties shall file a revised proposed Scheduling Order that incorporates the dates and decisions set out herein. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 2/23/2023. (dlb) (Entered: 02/23/2023) (0) |
| Feb 21, 2023 | 101 | PROPOSED ORDER [Proposed] Scheduling Order by Satius Holding, Inc.. (Rovner, Philip) (Entered: 02/21/2023) (17) |
| Feb 21, 2023 | 102 | Letter to The Honorable Christopher J. Burke from Philip A. Rovner regarding scheduling order dispute - re 101 Proposed Order. (Rovner, Philip) (Entered: 02/21/2023) (2) |
| Feb 21, 2023 | 103 | Letter to The Honorable Christopher J. Burke from Adam W. Poff regarding sole remaining dispute over the proposed scheduling order - re 98 Oral Order,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,,, 101 Proposed Order. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1 and 2)(Poff, Adam) (Entered: 02/21/2023) (0) |
| Feb 17, 2023 | 100 | STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to submit a proposed scheduling order and related papers to February 21, 2023 - filed by Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.. (Poff, Adam) (Entered: 02/17/2023) (1) |
| Feb 15, 2023 | 99 | MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Melissa T.G. Brenner, Timothy Layden, Charles J. Keller and Dean M. Yu - filed by Satius Holding, Inc.. (Rovner, Philip) (Entered: 02/15/2023) (6) |
| Feb 6, 2023 | 98 | ORAL ORDER: The Court, having reviewed Plaintiff Satius Holding, Inc.'s ("Plaintiff" or "Satius") motion seeking to lift the stay in this case (the "Motion"), (D.I. 94), and the briefing related thereto, (D.I. 95; D.I. 96; D.I. 97), hereby ORDERS that the motion is GRANTED. "When a court has imposed a stay, but circumstances have changed such that the court's reasons for imposing [that] stay no longer exist or are inappropriate, the court [] has the inherent power and discretion to lift the stay." Princeton Digit. Image Corp. v. Konami Digit. Ent. Inc., Civil Action Nos. 12-1461-LPS-CJB, 13-335-LPS-CJB, 2015 WL 219019, at *2 (D. Del. Jan. 14, 2015) (internal quotation marks and citation omitted). The stay was in place "pending completion of the ex parte reexamination proceedings for [the three asserted claims -- claims 1, 11 and 18 -- of] the '385 patent[.]" (D.I. 86) When considering the three stay-related factors, the Court agrees with Satius that subsequent developments in the reexamination proceedings demonstrate that the stay is no longer warranted. It so concludes for the following reasons: (1) With regard to the simplification factor, the United States Patent & Trademark Office ("PTO") has now confirmed the validity of dependent claims 11 and 18 twice in two separate ex parte reexamination proceedings. (D.I. 92 at 1-2; D.I. 95 at 1) Thus, these claims are ready to proceed here. As for independent claim 1, while it was ultimately confirmed valid in the first reexamination proceeding, it currently stands rejected in the second reexamination proceeding. (D.I. 92 at 1-2) Satius' response to the non-final office action in the second proceeding was due by January 29, 2023. (Id. at 2; D.I. 95 at 1 n.1) The elements of claim 1 are necessarily part of claims 11 and 18, and so proceeding with the litigation now would not result in wasted effort, even if the rejection of claim 1 continues to stand. (D.I. 95 at 1; see also 96 at 1) And Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. ("Defendants" or "Samsung") have not persuaded the Court that the remainder of the second proceeding regarding claim 1 will have a meaningful impact on what must still occur here, such that the stay should remain in effect on "simplification" grounds. See MG FreeSites Ltd. v. Scorpcast, LLC, Case No. 20-1012-MFK, D.I. 177 at 3, (D. Del. Oct. 5, 2022) (granting a request to lift a stay where, inter alia, the court was "not persuaded that a continued stay is likely to simplify the issues for trial to any significant extent, at least not in a way that outweighs the prejudice to [the plaintiff] that a continued stay would cause"). Instead, Samsung spends much of its brief setting out how "significant simplification" has already occurred and vaguely positing that "[k]eeping the stay in place will continue to simplify the issues in this litigation." (D.I. 96 at 1-2) Although Samsung suggested that Satius' response to the Examiner's rejection of claim 1 could have an impact on claim construction, (id.), that response was due by January 29, 2023, and so Samsung may utilize any arguments made in that response here if it wishes.; (2) With regard to the status of the case and undue prejudice factors, this case was filed over four and a half years ago. (D.I. 1) Before the stay, the parties were on the cusp of the Markman hearing; since the stay, the case has been dormant for over three years. (D.I. 95 at 2) Defendants shot their shot in the PTO in an effort to knock out all of the asserted claims, and all these years later, they have so far come up short. At a certain point, after such a long delay has transpired and the patentee still has some viable claims that are going to go forward in federal court no matter what, outsized delay of this type starts to become fundamentally unfair to a party like Satius, who understandably wants to obtain timely relief for alleged patent infringement. See Fed. R. Civ. P. 1; cf. MG FreeSites Ltd., D.I. 177 at 3. At this point, it is time to get the case moving again.; and (3) The stay of the case is hereby LIFTED. By no later than February 17, 2023, the parties shall meet and confer and submit a proposed amended Scheduling Order that addresses the remainder of the case. The proposed amended Scheduling Order shall be consistent with Judge Burke's form "Rule 16 Scheduling Order -- Patent" up through and including paragraph number 16 (i.e., regarding the portions of the case schedule leading up to but not including the case dispositive motion stage of the case) and consistent with paragraphs 15-22 of Judge Noreika's "Patent Scheduling Order -- Non-ANDA" (i.e., regarding the portions of the case schedule from the case dispositive motion stage through post-trial motions). Both Scheduling Orders can be found on Judge Burke's/Judge Noreika's portions of the District Court's website. If there are disputed issues between the parties regarding the content of the proposed amended Scheduling Order, the parties should note those areas of dispute in the proposed amended Scheduling Order, along with their proposals for the language the Court should adopt as to that issue. In addition, the parties may each separately file a letter (of no more than two single-spaced pages) setting forth their position as to these disputed issues. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 2/6/2023. (dlb) (Entered: 02/06/2023) (0) |
| Jan 25, 2023 | 97 | Letter to The Honorable Christopher J. Burke from Philip A. Rovner regarding Reply to Motion to Lift Stay - re 95 Letter. (Rovner, Philip) (Entered: 01/25/2023) (3) |
| Jan 20, 2023 | 96 | Letter to The Honorable Christopher J. Burke from Adam W. Poff regarding opposition to Plaintiff's Motion to Lift Stay - re 94 MOTION to Lift Stay . (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A & B)(Poff, Adam) (Entered: 01/20/2023) (0) |
| Jan 13, 2023 | 94 | MOTION to Lift Stay - filed by Satius Holding, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Rovner, Philip) (Entered: 01/13/2023) (0) |
| Jan 13, 2023 | 95 | Letter to The Honorable Christopher J. Burke from Philip A. Rovner regarding Motion to Lift Stay - re 94 MOTION to Lift Stay . (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1)(Rovner, Philip) (Entered: 01/13/2023) (0) |
| Jan 6, 2023 | 93 | ORAL ORDER: The Court, having reviewed the parties' January 4, 2023 status report, (D.I. 92), hereby ORDERS as follows: (1) By no later than January 13, 2023, Plaintiff may file a Motion for Leave to Lift the Stay and an accompanying letter brief of no longer than 2 single-spaced pages.; (2) By no later than January 20, 2023, Defendants may file a responsive letter brief of no longer than 2 single-spaced pages.; and (3) By no later than January 25, 2023, Plaintiff may file a reply letter brief of no longer than 1 single-spaced page. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 1/6/2023. (dlb) (Entered: 01/06/2023) (0) |
| Jan 4, 2023 | 92 | Joint STATUS REPORT by Satius Holding, Inc.. (Rovner, Philip) (Entered: 01/04/2023) (4) |
| Dec 22, 2022 | 91 | STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to file Joint Status Report to January 4, 2023 - filed by Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.. (Poff, Adam) (Entered: 12/22/2022) (1) |
| Dec 15, 2022 | 90 | ORAL ORDER: The Court hereby ORDERS that by no later than December 22, 2022, the parties shall submit a joint status report advising the Court of the status of the reexamination proceeding for United States Patent No. 6,711,385. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 12/15/2022. (dlb) (Entered: 12/15/2022) (0) |
| Jul 27, 2022 | 89 | Notice of Change of Address (2) Docket Text: NOTICE of Change of Address by Philip A. Rovner (Rovner, Philip) |
| Apr 4, 2022 | 88 | Notice of Appearance (1) Docket Text: NOTICE of Appearance by Philip A. Rovner on behalf of Satius Holding, Inc. (Rovner, Philip) |
| Mar 31, 2022 | N/A | Case No Longer Referred to Mediation (0) Docket Text: CASE NO LONGER REFERRED to Chief Magistrate Judge Thynge for the purpose of exploring ADR. Pursuant to the Court's Standing Order No. 2022-2, dated March 14, 2022, "[u]nless otherwise directed by the Court, Magistrate Judges will no longer engage in alternative dispute resolution of patent and securities cases." See also 28 U.S.C. § 652(b). (Taylor, Daniel) |
| Dec 11, 2019 | N/A | Oral Order (0) Docket Text: ORAL ORDER: The Court, having reviewed Defendants' motion to stay pending competition of ex parte reexamination proceedings for U.S. Patent No. 6,711,385 (the "'385 patent") ("motion"), (D.I. 73), and the briefing related thereto, (D.I. 74; D.I. 77; D.I. 81), which only recently concluded on December 5, 2019, and having considered the three stay-related factors, hereby ORDERS that the motion is GRANTED and that the case is STAYED pending completion of the ex parte reexamination proceedings for the '385 patent. The simplification of issues factor slightly favors a stay. The United States Patent and Trademark Office ("PTO") granted Defendants' request for ex parte reexamination of all three asserted claims of the 385 patent. (D.I. 74 at 1) To be sure, the PTO will not take up all of the issues that are at play in this case. But with all of the asserted claims at issue there, there is the real prospect that the parties and the Court could engage in a significant amount of work going forward, only to have the PTO end up eliminating all claims at issue (or otherwise issuing decisions that could have a significant impact on the invalidity case). And while it is true that if Plaintiff prevails in the reexamination proceeding, Defendants will not be estopped from raising the same invalidity issues here, the Court would then at least have the benefit of the PTO's views on the prior art (including as to the '980 PCT publication issue, which seems a key invalidity issue in the case). That could help focus and streamline the Court's review of issues surrounding that art later in this litigation. The status of the case factor is either neutral or slightly favors a stay, as: (1) While we are not at the beginning of the case schedule, and a not-insignificant amount of work has been put into the case, there are also many substantial milestones still ahead (i.e., the Markman hearing and the issuance of claim construction decisions, fact deposition-related discovery, expert discovery, summary judgment).; and (2) As document discovery has concluded, the parties are at a good "stopping point" where they can await the resolution of the reexamination proceeding and then proceed forward toward trial (if necessary). See 360Heros, Inc. v. GoPro, Inc., Civil Action No. 17-1302-LPS-CJB, D.I. 132, (D. Del. June 5, 2019); Ethicon LLC v. Intuitive Surgical, Inc., C.A. No. 17-871-LPS, 2019 WL 1276029, at *2 (D. Del. Mar. 20, 2019). Lastly, the undue prejudice factor weighs in favor of a stay. Most significantly, the parties are not direct competitors and Plaintiff will be able to seek monetary damages to fully compensate it for infringement occurring between now and when a stay ends. As to the other undue prejudice subfactors, they are a mixed bag. With regard to the timing of the ex parte reexamination request, Defendants did wait 15 months until after Plaintiff filed this action to file their request for reexamination. (D.I. 77 at 5) And during this timeframe, the parties have engaged in a significant amount of work relating to discovery and claim construction. However, Defendants make a good case that Plaintiff's litigation choices are partly responsible for some of this filing delay, as Plaintiff made Defendants seek Court intervention in order to get a substantive response to Defendants' invalidity contentions. (D.I. 52) Had Plaintiff served a sufficient response months earlier, Defendants presumably would have moved sooner to institute a process for review of the asserted claims by the PTO. With regard to the timing of the stay request, Defendants sought a stay soon after reexamination was granted, which helps their motion. And as for the status of the reexamination proceeding, the proceeding is at a relatively early stage, but the PTO has moved quickly so far and an office action is expected to be issued in the next few months (at the latest) with regard to all asserted claims. (D.I. 74 at 8) Thus, the undue prejudice factor (particularly in light of the lack of direct competition), ultimately favors a stay. Ultimately, though the issues are not lopsided, a stay makes sense here. The parties and the Court are on the precipice of a significant new stage of work in the case as to asserted claims that may well be found invalid at the PTO. Although the case is now stayed, if a party believes that subsequent developments in the reexamination proceeding suggest that a stay is no longer warranted, it may communicate with the Court by letter with a request to brief that issue. Otherwise, the parties shall jointly notify the Court by letter within 10 days of the conclusion of the reexamination proceeding. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 12/11/2019. (dlb) |
| Dec 11, 2019 | N/A | Oral Order (0) Docket Text: ORAL ORDER: In light of the Court's oral order today granting Defendants' motion to stay pending competition of ex parte reexamination proceedings for U.S. Patent No. 6,711,385, the Court hereby ORDERS that the Markman hearing scheduled for December 16, 2019 is CANCELED. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 12/11/2019. (dlb) |
| Dec 9, 2019 | N/A | Oral Order (0) Docket Text: ORAL ORDER: The Court, having reviewed the parties' December 6, 2019 letter regarding the December 16, 2019 Markman hearing, (D.I. 83), HEREBY ORDERS that the parties' proposals regarding time allocation, the order of the terms and which side will present argument first for each term is adopted. Four hours will be allocated for argument, to be split equally between the parties. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 12/9/2019. (dlb) |
| Dec 9, 2019 | 85 | Notice of Service (2) Docket Text: NOTICE OF SERVICE of Plaintiff Satius Holding, Inc.'s Second Set of Requests for Production of Documents to Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. (Nos. 49-56) and Plaintiff Satius Holding, Inc.'s Second Set of Interrogatories to Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. (Nos. 10-12) filed by Satius Holding, Inc..(Silverstein, Alan) |
| Dec 6, 2019 | 83 | Letter (3) Docket Text: Letter to The Honorable Christopher J. Burke from Alan R. Silverstein regarding joint submission regarding Markman hearing - re [76] Oral Order,,,,,. (Silverstein, Alan) |
| Dec 5, 2019 | 81 | Reply Brief (16) Docket Text: REPLY BRIEF re [73] MOTION to Stay Pending Completion of Ex Parte Reexamination Proceedings for U.S. Patent No. 6,711,385 filed by Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.. (Kraman, Pilar) |
| Dec 5, 2019 | 82 | Declaration (Main Document) (4) Docket Text: DECLARATION re [81] Reply Brief - Declaration of Patrick N. Flynn - by Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 10-14)(Kraman, Pilar) |
| Dec 5, 2019 | 82 | Declaration (Exhibit 10-14) (30) Docket Text: DECLARATION re [81] Reply Brief - Declaration of Patrick N. Flynn - by Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 10-14)(Kraman, Pilar) |
| Nov 27, 2019 | N/A | SO ORDERED (0) Docket Text: SO ORDERED D.I. [80] STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for Defendants to file their reply brief in support of their [73] Motion to Stay to December 5, 2019 filed by Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 11/27/2019. (mlc) |
| Nov 27, 2019 | 79 | Notice of Service (Main Document) (2) Docket Text: NOTICE OF SERVICE of subpoenas on Alliacense LLC and Kenwood U.S.A. Corporation filed by Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1-2)(Kraman, Pilar) |
| Nov 27, 2019 | 79 | Notice of Service (Exhibit 1-2) (30) Docket Text: NOTICE OF SERVICE of subpoenas on Alliacense LLC and Kenwood U.S.A. Corporation filed by Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1-2)(Kraman, Pilar) |
| Nov 27, 2019 | 80 | Stipulation to EXTEND Time (1) Docket Text: STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for Defendants to file their reply brief in support of their [73] Motion to Stay to December 5, 2019 - filed by Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.. (Kraman, Pilar) |
| Nov 26, 2019 | 77 | Answering Brief in Opposition (17) Docket Text: ANSWERING BRIEF in Opposition re [73] MOTION to Stay Pending Completion of Ex Parte Reexamination Proceedings for U.S. Patent No. 6,711,385 filed by Satius Holding, Inc..Reply Brief due date per Local Rules is 12/3/2019. (Silverstein, Alan) |
| Nov 26, 2019 | 78 | Declaration (Main Document) (3) Docket Text: DECLARATION re [77] Answering Brief in Opposition, to Motion to Stay Pending Completion of Ex Parte Reexamination Proceedings for U.S. Patent No. 6,711,385 - Declaration of Shannon Hedvat by Satius Holding, Inc.. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1-9)(Silverstein, Alan) |
| Nov 26, 2019 | 78 | Declaration (Exhibit 1-9) (30) Docket Text: DECLARATION re [77] Answering Brief in Opposition, to Motion to Stay Pending Completion of Ex Parte Reexamination Proceedings for U.S. Patent No. 6,711,385 - Declaration of Shannon Hedvat by Satius Holding, Inc.. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1-9)(Silverstein, Alan) |
| Nov 22, 2019 | N/A | Oral Order (0) Docket Text: ORAL ORDER: The Court hereby ORDERS that on or before December 6, 2019, local and lead counsel for the parties shall meet and confer and file an amended joint claim construction chart that sets forth the terms that remain in dispute. The meet and confer shall focus on an attempt to reach agreement on any remaining disputed terms where possible and on an attempt to focus the dispute over the remaining terms in light of the parties claim construction briefing. Accompanying any amended joint claim construction chart, the parties shall file a letter with the Court identifying by name each individual who participated in the meet and confer, when and how that meet and confer occurred and how long it lasted. If no agreements on constructions have been reached or if no dispute has been narrowed on the meet and confer, the letter shall so state and the parties need not file an amended joint claim construction chart. The letter should also notify the Court: (1) whether the parties request leave to present testimony at the Markman hearing; (2) the amount of time they request be allocated to them for the hearing; and (3) the order in which they intend to present the claim terms at issue, including which side will present first for each term. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 11/22/2019. (dlb) |
| Nov 12, 2019 | 73 | Motion to Stay (Main Document) (4) Docket Text: MOTION to Stay Pending Completion of Ex Parte Reexamination Proceedings for U.S. Patent No. 6,711,385 - filed by Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.. (Attachments: # (1) Local Rule 7.1.1 Certification, # (2) Text of Proposed Order)(Kraman, Pilar) |
| Nov 12, 2019 | 73 | Motion to Stay (Local Rule 7.1.1 Certification) (1) Docket Text: MOTION to Stay Pending Completion of Ex Parte Reexamination Proceedings for U.S. Patent No. 6,711,385 - filed by Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.. (Attachments: # (1) Local Rule 7.1.1 Certification, # (2) Text of Proposed Order)(Kraman, Pilar) |
| Nov 12, 2019 | 73 | Motion to Stay (Text of Proposed Order) (1) Docket Text: MOTION to Stay Pending Completion of Ex Parte Reexamination Proceedings for U.S. Patent No. 6,711,385 - filed by Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.. (Attachments: # (1) Local Rule 7.1.1 Certification, # (2) Text of Proposed Order)(Kraman, Pilar) |
| Nov 12, 2019 | 74 | Opening Brief in Support (24) Docket Text: OPENING BRIEF in Support re [73] MOTION to Stay Pending Completion of Ex Parte Reexamination Proceedings for U.S. Patent No. 6,711,385 filed by Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd..Answering Brief/Response due date per Local Rules is 11/26/2019. (Kraman, Pilar) |
| Nov 12, 2019 | 75 | Declaration (Main Document) (4) Docket Text: DECLARATION re [74] Opening Brief in Support, [73] MOTION to Stay Pending Completion of Ex Parte Reexamination Proceedings for U.S. Patent No. 6,711,385 - Declaration of Patrick N. Flynn - by Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1-9)(Kraman, Pilar) |
| Nov 12, 2019 | 75 | Declaration (Exhibit 1-9) (30) Docket Text: DECLARATION re [74] Opening Brief in Support, [73] MOTION to Stay Pending Completion of Ex Parte Reexamination Proceedings for U.S. Patent No. 6,711,385 - Declaration of Patrick N. Flynn - by Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1-9)(Kraman, Pilar) |
| Nov 6, 2019 | 72 | Claim Construction Surreply Brief (Main Document) (17) Docket Text: CLAIM CONSTRUCTION SURREPLY BRIEF re [71] Claim Construction Reply Brief filed by Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 11)(Kraman, Pilar) |
| Nov 6, 2019 | 72 | Claim Construction Surreply Brief (Exhibit 11) (23) Docket Text: CLAIM CONSTRUCTION SURREPLY BRIEF re [71] Claim Construction Reply Brief filed by Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 11)(Kraman, Pilar) |
| Oct 23, 2019 | 71 | Claim Construction Reply Brief (15) Docket Text: CLAIM CONSTRUCTION REPLY BRIEF re [62] Claim Construction Answering Brief filed by Satius Holding, Inc.. (Silverstein, Alan) |
| Oct 18, 2019 | 70 | Status Report (3) Docket Text: Interim STATUS REPORT by Satius Holding, Inc.. (Silverstein, Alan) |
| Oct 16, 2019 | N/A | SO ORDERED (0) Docket Text: SO ORDERED D.I. [67] STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to file Interim Status Report to October 18, 2019 filed by Satius Holding, Inc. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 10/16/2019. (dlb) |
| Oct 16, 2019 | 68 | Redacted Document (28) Docket Text: REDACTED VERSION of [62] Claim Construction Answering Brief by Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.. (Poff, Adam) |
| Oct 16, 2019 | 69 | Redacted Document (Main Document) (4) Docket Text: REDACTED VERSION of [63] Declaration, by Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1-10)(Poff, Adam) |
| Oct 16, 2019 | 69 | Redacted Document (Exhibit 1-10) (30) Docket Text: REDACTED VERSION of [63] Declaration, by Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1-10)(Poff, Adam) |
| Oct 15, 2019 | 67 | Stipulation to EXTEND Time (2) Docket Text: STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to file Interim Status Report to October 18, 2019 - filed by Satius Holding, Inc.. (Silverstein, Alan) |
| Oct 10, 2019 | N/A | CORRECTING ENTRY: (0) Docket Text: CORRECTING ENTRY: PDF as attached as exhibits to D.I. 63 has been replaced at the request of the filer. (dlb) |
| Oct 9, 2019 | 64 | Declaration (Main Document) (30) Docket Text: DECLARATION re [62] Claim Construction Answering Brief - Declaration of Michael Steer, Ph.D. - by Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.. (Attachments: # (1) Appendix A, # (2) Appendix B)(Poff, Adam) |
| Oct 9, 2019 | 64 | Declaration (Appendix A) (30) Docket Text: DECLARATION re [62] Claim Construction Answering Brief - Declaration of Michael Steer, Ph.D. - by Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.. (Attachments: # (1) Appendix A, # (2) Appendix B)(Poff, Adam) |
| Oct 9, 2019 | 64 | Declaration (Appendix B) (4) Docket Text: DECLARATION re [62] Claim Construction Answering Brief - Declaration of Michael Steer, Ph.D. - by Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.. (Attachments: # (1) Appendix A, # (2) Appendix B)(Poff, Adam) |
| Oct 9, 2019 | 65 | Statement (7) Docket Text: STATEMENT re [56] Statement - Samsung's Comments on Satius's Technical Tutorial for U.S. Patent No., 6,711, 385 - by Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.. (Poff, Adam) |
| Oct 9, 2019 | 66 | Statement (6) Docket Text: STATEMENT re [54] Notice (Other) Plaintiff Satius Holding, Inc.'s Comments on Defendants' Technology Tutorial by Satius Holding, Inc.. (Silverstein, Alan) |
| Sep 27, 2019 | 61 | Notice Requesting Removal of Co-Counsel (4) Docket Text: NOTICE requesting Clerk to remove Gregory S. Nieberg as co-counsel. Reason for request: No longer with the law firm of Covington & Burling LLP. (Kraman, Pilar) |
| Sep 24, 2019 | 60 | Order (6) Docket Text: ORDER regarding Electronically Stored Information. Signed by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 9/24/2019. (dlb) |
| Sep 23, 2019 | 59 | Stipulation (6) Docket Text: STIPULATION and Order Regarding Electronically Stored Information by Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.. (Kraman, Pilar) |
| Sep 10, 2019 | N/A | Multi Media Document (0) Docket Text: MULTI MEDIA DOCUMENT filed by Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. in the form of a (1) CD. Filing related to [54] Notice (Other). (Media on file in Clerk's Office). (dlb) |
| Sep 10, 2019 | 58 | Notice of Service (2) Docket Text: NOTICE OF SERVICE of Plaintiff Satius Holding, Inc.'s Supplemental Objections and Response to the Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc.'s Interrogatory No. 13, and Appendices A01-A29 filed by Satius Holding, Inc..(Silverstein, Alan) |
| Sep 6, 2019 | 54 | Notice (Other) (2) Docket Text: NOTICE of Lodging of Technology Tutorial by Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. (Kraman, Pilar) |
| Sep 6, 2019 | 55 | Claim Construction Opening Brief (22) Docket Text: CLAIM CONSTRUCTION OPENING BRIEF filed by Satius Holding, Inc.. (Silverstein, Alan) |
| Sep 6, 2019 | 56 | Statement (9) Docket Text: STATEMENT [Technology Tutorial] by Satius Holding, Inc.. (Silverstein, Alan) |
| Aug 23, 2019 | 53 | Notice of Service (2) Docket Text: NOTICE OF SERVICE of Plaintiff's First Supplemental Objections and Responses to Defendants' First Set of Interrogatories (Nos. 7-8, 10) filed by Satius Holding, Inc..(Silverstein, Alan) |
| Aug 8, 2019 | N/A | Oral Order (0) Docket Text: ORAL ORDER: The Court, having reviewed the parties' discovery dispute motion relating to Defendants' request that Plaintiff be compelled to provide substantive, narrative responses to Defendants' Interrogatories Nos. 7, 8, 10, 11, 13 and 14, (the "Motion"), (D.I. [47]), and the parties' letter briefs relating thereto, (D.I. 48; D.I. 50), and having heard argument on August 5, 2019, hereby ORDERS as follows with respect to Defendants' Motion: (1) With respect to Interrogatories Nos. 7 and 8, Defendants' Motion is GRANTED. By no later than August 22, 2019, Plaintiff shall provide Defendants with supplemental responses relating to its claims for damages based on the information currently available to it. (2) With respect to Interrogatory No. 10, Defendants' Motion is GRANTED. Plaintiff now has an understanding of the scope of this Interrogatory that is not redundant with Interrogatories 7 and 8 (i.e., that it is asking for a description of communications regarding how this lawsuit might be valued). By no later than August 22, 2019, Plaintiff shall provide Defendants with a supplemental response that identifies any responsive, non-privileged communications. (3) With respect to Interrogatory No. 11, Defendants' Motion is DENIED AS MOOT. Plaintiff has represented that it has not identified any responsive information to date. To the extent that Plaintiff identifies responsive information in the future, it shall provide a supplemental response (and to the extent such supplemental response relies on Fed. R. Civ. P. 33(d), Plaintiff shall identify with particularly the documents to which it refers, consistent with that Rule). (4) With respect to Interrogatory No. 13, Defendants' Motion is GRANTED, subject to the following clarification. By no later than September 9, 2019, Plaintiff shall provide a supplemental response that outlines its responsive positions to Defendants' Initial Invalidity Contentions. That response needs to provide a similar amount of detail in setting out Plaintiff's validity contentions as was provided by Defendants in their Initial Invalidity Contentions. This means, among other things, that Plaintiff will have to provide detailed responses to Defendants' 29 charts (only as to the assertion that the 29 references anticipate the claims), and provide detailed responses to Defendants' contentions regarding invalidity under 35 U.S.C. § 101 and 35 U.S.C. § 112. However, because Defendants did not chart out (or otherwise articulate) in any specific way their proposed obviousness combinations, Plaintiff need not respond now as to why each of these numerous (i.e., "hundreds, if not thousands") of possible combinations fail to render the claims invalid. (D.I. 50 at 2-3) (5) With respect to Interrogatory No. 14, Defendants' Motion is DENIED. As Plaintiff has pointed out, Defendants' Initial Invalidity Contentions do not clearly set out the specific obviousness combinations that they intend to rely upon. (Id.) Once Defendants have identified their obviousness combinations with more specificity, Plaintiff shall subsequently provide a supplemental response to Interrogatory No. 14 that meaningfully articulates the objective indicia of nonobviousness that it intends to rely upon based on the information then available to it. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 8/8/2019. (mlc) |
| Aug 7, 2019 | 51 | Redacted Document (Main Document) (5) Docket Text: REDACTED VERSION of [50] Letter to The Honorable Christopher J. Burke from Alan R. Silverstein regarding discovery dispute by Satius Holding, Inc.. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1-4)(Silverstein, Alan) |
| Aug 7, 2019 | 51 | Redacted Document (Exhibit 1-4) (30) Docket Text: REDACTED VERSION of [50] Letter to The Honorable Christopher J. Burke from Alan R. Silverstein regarding discovery dispute by Satius Holding, Inc.. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1-4)(Silverstein, Alan) |
| Aug 5, 2019 | N/A | Discovery Conference (0) Docket Text: Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Christopher J. Burke - Discovery dispute teleconference held on 8/5/2019. The Court heard argument regarding Defendants' discovery dispute, (D.I. 47), and took the matter under advisement. (Court Reporter Stacy Vickers (Hawkins). Clerk: M. Crawford) Appearances: A. Silverstein, L. Kobialka for Plaintiff; P. Kraman, A. Poff, P. Flynn, B. Bieluch for Defendants. (mlc) |
| Jul 30, 2019 | 49 | Redacted Document (Main Document) (4) Docket Text: REDACTED VERSION of [48] Letter, by Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.. (Attachments: # (1) Text of Proposed Order, # (2) Exhibit A-K)(Kraman, Pilar) |
| Jul 30, 2019 | 49 | Redacted Document (Text of Proposed Order) (1) Docket Text: REDACTED VERSION of [48] Letter, by Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.. (Attachments: # (1) Text of Proposed Order, # (2) Exhibit A-K)(Kraman, Pilar) |
| Jul 30, 2019 | 49 | Redacted Document (Exhibit A-K) (30) Docket Text: REDACTED VERSION of [48] Letter, by Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.. (Attachments: # (1) Text of Proposed Order, # (2) Exhibit A-K)(Kraman, Pilar) |
| Jul 26, 2019 | N/A | Oral Order (0) Docket Text: ORAL ORDER Setting Teleconference: The Court has reviewed the parties' July 24, 2019 letter requesting a discovery teleconference regarding 1 discovery dispute. (D.I. [45]) It hereby ORDERS that the procedures for resolving a discovery dispute set out in the Scheduling Order, (D.I. 20 at 6-8), will be modified as follows with regard to this dispute: (1) The parties shall file a joint "Motion for Teleconference to Resolve Discovery Dispute," the text of which can be found in the "Forms" tab of Judge Burke's page on the District Court's website.; (2) A discovery dispute teleconference is set for 8/5/2019 at 03:00 PM before Judge Christopher J. Burke.; (3) Not less than ninety-six (96) hours prior to the conference, excluding weekends and holidays, the party seeking relief shall file with the Court a letter, not to exceed three (3) pages, in no less than 12-point font, outlining the issues in dispute and its position on those issues. This submission shall include: (a) a proposed order, attached as an exhibit, setting out the nature of the relief requested of the Court; and (b) to the extent that the dispute relates to responses to certain discovery requests, an attached exhibit (or exhibits) containing the requests and the responses in dispute. Not less than forty-eight (48) hours prior to the conference, excluding weekends and holidays, any party opposing the application for relief may file a letter, not to exceed three (3) pages, in no less than 12-point font, outlining that party(s) reasons for its opposition. To the extent that factual issues are disputed or are otherwise central to the Court's analysis, the parties shall attach as an exhibit (or exhibits) sworn declarations or affidavits regarding those issues.; (4) Two courtesy copies of the letters and any attachments are to be hand-delivered to the Clerk's Office within one hour of e-filing; and (5) The Court may choose to resolve the dispute(s) prior to the telephone conference. If it does so, it will cancel the conference.Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 7/26/2019. (mlc) |
| Jul 26, 2019 | 47 | Motion for Miscellaneous Relief (4) Docket Text: MOTION for Teleconference to Resolve Discovery Dispute re [46] Oral Order,,,,,,,,, Order Setting Teleconference,,,,,,,, - filed by Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.. (Kraman, Pilar) |
| Jul 24, 2019 | 45 | Letter (2) Docket Text: Joint Letter to The Honorable Christopher J. Burke from Pilar G. Kraman regarding the parties' request for the scheduling of a discovery teleconference. (Kraman, Pilar) |
| Jul 23, 2019 | N/A | SO ORDERED (0) Docket Text: SO ORDERED D.I. [44] Stipulation regarding claim construction briefing deadlines filed by Satius Holding, Inc. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 7/23/2019. (mlc) |
| Jul 22, 2019 | 44 | Stipulation (2) Docket Text: STIPULATION and [Proposed] Order regarding Claim Construction Briefing Deadlines by Satius Holding, Inc.. (Silverstein, Alan) |
| Jul 17, 2019 | 43 | Notice of Service (2) Docket Text: NOTICE OF SERVICE of Samsung Defendants' Objections and Responses to Plaintiff Satius Holding, Inc.'s First Set of Interrogatories (Nos. 1-9) filed by Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd..(Kraman, Pilar) |
| Jul 16, 2019 | 42 | Notice of Service (2) Docket Text: NOTICE OF SERVICE of Plaintiff Satius Holding, Inc.'s Objections and Responses to Second Set of Requests for Production of Documents of Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. (Nos. 28-33) and Plaintiff Satius Holding, Inc.'s Objections and Responses to the First Set of Interrogatories of Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. (Nos. 1-14) filed by Satius Holding, Inc..(Silverstein, Alan) |
| Jul 1, 2019 | N/A | SO ORDERED (0) Docket Text: SO ORDERED D.I. [41] Stipulation regarding the Hearing on Claim Construction and Discovery filed by Satius Holding, Inc. A Markman Hearing is set for 12/16/2019 at 11:00 AM in Courtroom 2A before Judge Christopher J. Burke. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 7/1/2019. (dlb) |
| Jun 28, 2019 | 41 | Stipulation (2) Docket Text: STIPULATION and [Proposed] Order Regarding the Hearing on Claim Construction and Discovery Deadlines by Satius Holding, Inc.. (Silverstein, Alan) |
| Jun 17, 2019 | 40 | Claim Construction Chart (Main Document) (20) Docket Text: CLAIM Construction Chart by Satius Holding, Inc.. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A-R)(Silverstein, Alan) |
| Jun 17, 2019 | 40 | Claim Construction Chart (Exhibit A-R) (30) Docket Text: CLAIM Construction Chart by Satius Holding, Inc.. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A-R)(Silverstein, Alan) |
| Jun 4, 2019 | 39 | Notice of Service (2) Docket Text: NOTICE OF SERVICE of Plaintiff's Satius Holding, Inc.'s First Set of Interrogatories to Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. (Nos. 1-9) filed by Satius Holding, Inc..(Silverstein, Alan) |
| Jun 3, 2019 | 38 | Notice of Service (2) Docket Text: NOTICE OF SERVICE of 1) Defendants' First Set of Interrogatories to Plaintiff (Nos. 1-14), and 2) Defendants' Second Set of Requests for Production of Documents and Things (Nos. 28-33) filed by Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd..(Kraman, Pilar) |
| May 21, 2019 | 37 | Notice of Service (2) Docket Text: NOTICE OF SERVICE of Plaintiff's Proposed Constructions for Claim Terms filed by Satius Holding, Inc..(Silverstein, Alan) |
| May 20, 2019 | 36 | Notice of Service (2) Docket Text: NOTICE OF SERVICE of Samsung Defendants' Preliminary Claim Constructions of Claim Terms and Phrases filed by Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd..(Kraman, Pilar) |
| Apr 5, 2019 | 35 | Notice of Service (2) Docket Text: NOTICE OF SERVICE of Samsung's Initial Invalidity Contentions filed by Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd..(Kraman, Pilar) |
| Feb 26, 2019 | 34 | Notice of Service (2) Docket Text: NOTICE OF SERVICE of Plaintiff Satius Holding, Inc.'s Objections and Responses to the First Set of Requests for Production of Documents and Things of Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. (Nos. 1-27) filed by Satius Holding, Inc..(Silverstein, Alan) |
| Feb 22, 2019 | 32 | Notice of Service (2) Docket Text: NOTICE OF SERVICE of Samsung Defendants' Objections and Responses to Plaintiff Satius Holding, Inc.'s First Set of Requests for Production of Documents (Nos. 1-48) filed by Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd..(Kraman, Pilar) |
| Feb 22, 2019 | 33 | Notice of Service (2) Docket Text: NOTICE OF SERVICE of Plaintiff Satius Holding, Inc.'s Initial Claim Charts Pursuant to Section 7(c) of the Rule 16 Scheduling Order filed by Satius Holding, Inc..(Silverstein, Alan) |
| Jan 28, 2019 | 31 | Notice of Service (2) Docket Text: NOTICE OF SERVICE of Defendants' First Set of Requests for Production of Documents and Things (Nos. 1-27) and Defendants' core technical documents and sales figures for the accused products filed by Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd..(Kraman, Pilar) |
| Jan 22, 2019 | 30 | Notice of Service (2) Docket Text: NOTICE OF SERVICE of Plaintiff Satius Holding, Inc.'s First Set of Requests for Production of Documents to Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. (Nos. 1-48) filed by Satius Holding, Inc..(Silverstein, Alan) |
| Jan 17, 2019 | 29 | Protective Order (30) Docket Text: Stipulated PROTECTIVE ORDER. Signed by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 1/17/2019. (dlb) |
| Jan 16, 2019 | 28 | Proposed Order (30) Docket Text: PROPOSED ORDER - [Proposed] Stipulated Protective Order - by Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.. (Poff, Adam) |
| Jan 9, 2019 | N/A | SO ORDERED (0) Docket Text: SO ORDERED D.I. [27] STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to Submit Protective Order to January 16, 2019 filed by Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 1/9/2019. (mlc) |
| Jan 9, 2019 | 27 | Stipulation to EXTEND Time (2) Docket Text: STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to Submit Protective Order to January 16, 2019 - filed by Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.. (Poff, Adam) |
| Jan 2, 2019 | 25 | Notice of Service (2) Docket Text: NOTICE OF SERVICE of Plaintiff Satius Holding, Inc.'s Disclosures of Custodians, Data Sources and Notice filed by Satius Holding, Inc..(Silverstein, Alan) |
| Jan 2, 2019 | 26 | Notice of Service (2) Docket Text: NOTICE OF SERVICE of Disclosures of Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. Pursuant to the Courts Default Standard for Discovery filed by Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd..(Kraman, Pilar) |
| Dec 21, 2018 | 24 | Notice of Service (2) Docket Text: NOTICE OF SERVICE of Plaintiff Satius Holding Inc.'s Identification of Accused Products and Patent filed by Satius Holding, Inc..(Silverstein, Alan) |
| Dec 17, 2018 | 22 | Notice of Service (2) Docket Text: NOTICE OF SERVICE of Plaintiff Satius Holding, Inc.'s Initial Disclosures Pursuant to Rule 26(a)(1) filed by Satius Holding, Inc..(Silverstein, Alan) |
| Dec 17, 2018 | 23 | Notice of Service (2) Docket Text: NOTICE OF SERVICE of Initial Disclosures of Defendants Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. and Samsung Electronics America, Inc. filed by Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd..(Kraman, Pilar) |
| Dec 11, 2018 | N/A | Case Referred to Mediation (0) Docket Text: CASE REFERRED to Chief Magistrate Judge Mary Pat Thynge for Mediation. Please see Standing Order dated January 20, 2016, regarding disclosure of confidential ADR communications. A link to the standing order is provided here for your convenience at http://www.ded.uscourts.gov/general-orders/magistrate-judges-standing-order-adr-mediation (cak) |
| Dec 11, 2018 | N/A | Oral Order (0) Docket Text: ORAL ORDER: This matter has been referred to Chief Magistrate Judge Mary Pat Thynge for ADR. Counsel are to advise on or before Thursday, January 3, 2019, by email to Judge Thynge, with a copy to her Judicial Administrator, Ms. Kennedy, as well as opposing counsel, their clients interest in mediation and the timing when mediation is preferred with a very brief explanation why. Ordered by Chief Magistrate Judge Mary Pat Thynge on 12/11/18. (cak) |
| Dec 10, 2018 | 20 | Scheduling Order (16) Docket Text: SCHEDULING ORDER: Case referred to the Magistrate Judge for the purpose of exploring ADR. Joinder of Parties due by 2/5/2019. Discovery due by 1/21/2020. Status Report due by 10/15/2019. Dispositive Motions due by 7/21/2020. Claim Construction Opening Brief due by 8/8/2019. A Markman Hearing is set for 10/30/2019 at 11:00 AM in Courtroom 2A before Judge Christopher J. Burke. A Pretrial Conference is set for 11/24/2020 at 03:00 PM in Courtroom 4A before Judge Maryellen Noreika. A Jury Trial is set for 12/7/2020 at 09:30 AM in Courtroom 4A before Judge Maryellen Noreika.. Signed by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 12/10/2018. (mlc) |
| Dec 7, 2018 | 19 | Proposed Order (16) Docket Text: PROPOSED ORDER regarding Scheduling by Satius Holding, Inc.. (Silverstein, Alan) |
| Dec 6, 2018 | 18 | Transcript (30) Docket Text: Official Transcript of Teleconference held on 12/03/2018 before Judge Christopher J. Burke. Court Reporter/Transcriber Taneha Carroll,Telephone number 302-658-6697. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased through the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 12/27/2018. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 1/7/2019. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 3/6/2019. (dh) |
| Dec 4, 2018 | N/A | Add Attorneys Pro Hac Vice (0) Docket Text: Pro Hac Vice Attorney Richard L. Rainey for Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (crb) |
| Dec 3, 2018 | N/A | Scheduling Conference (0) Docket Text: Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Christopher J. Burke - Case Management/Scheduling Conference held on 12/3/2018. The Court provided key dates and resolved the parties dispute. Counsel shall submit an final proposed order (as instructed) by no later than close of business on December 7, 2018. (Clerk, D. Benyo) APPEARANCES: A. Silverstein, S. Heduat for Plaintiff; P. Kramen, P. Flynn, R. Rainey for Defendants. (Court Reporter Taneha Carroll (Hawkins)) (dlb) |
| Nov 21, 2018 | N/A | Remark re Newer Attorneys (0) Docket Text: REMARK: The parties should be aware that the Court encourages the participation of newer attorneys in courtroom proceedings and at oral argument. Please see the Court's Standing Order Regarding Courtroom Opportunities for Newer Attorneys, a link to which is provided here for the parties' convenience:http://www.ded.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/forms/StandingOrder2017.pdf (dlb) |
| Nov 19, 2018 | N/A | Oral Order (0) Docket Text: ORAL ORDER REFERRING CASE to Magistrate Judge Christopher J. Burke: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the above-captioned case is referred to Magistrate Judge Christopher J. Burke to hear and resolve all pre-trial matters up to and including expert discovery matters (but not including summary judgment motions, Daubert motions, pre-trial motions in limine or the pre-trial conference), subject to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b) and any further Order of the Court. All subsequent filings in this action shall be captioned as follows: Civil Action No. 18-850-MN-CJB. ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 11/19/2018. (dlw) |
| Nov 16, 2018 | N/A | Case Assigned/Reassigned (0) Docket Text: Case Reassigned to Judge Maryellen Noreika. Please include the initials of the Judge (MN) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb) |
| Nov 9, 2018 | 16 | Notice Requesting Removal of Co-Counsel (3) Docket Text: NOTICE requesting Clerk to remove Hwa Young Jin as co-counsel.. (Kraman, Pilar) |
| Oct 31, 2018 | N/A | Order Setting Scheduling Conference (0) Docket Text: Oral Order Re-Setting Case Management/Scheduling Conference: At the request of counsel, the Case Management/Scheduling Conference set for 11/19/18 is cancelled. A Case Management/Scheduling Conference is now set for 12/3/2018 at 03:00 PM in Courtroom 2A before Judge Christopher J. Burke. Signed by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 10/31/2018. (dlb) |
| Oct 29, 2018 | N/A | Order Setting Scheduling Conference (0) Docket Text: Order Setting Case Management/Scheduling Conference: A Case Management/Scheduling Conference is set for 11/19/2018 at 03:00 PM in Courtroom 2A before Judge Christopher J. Burke. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 10/29/2018. (dlb) |
| Oct 26, 2018 | 15 | Letter (Main Document) (4) Docket Text: Letter to the Honorable Christopher J. Burke from Alan R. Silverstein regarding joint submission of draft Scheduling Order and Checklist - re Oral Order,,,,,. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A, # (2) Exhibit B)(Silverstein, Alan) |
| Oct 26, 2018 | 15 | Letter (Exhibit A) (18) Docket Text: Letter to the Honorable Christopher J. Burke from Alan R. Silverstein regarding joint submission of draft Scheduling Order and Checklist - re Oral Order,,,,,. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A, # (2) Exhibit B)(Silverstein, Alan) |
| Oct 26, 2018 | 15 | Letter (Exhibit B) (5) Docket Text: Letter to the Honorable Christopher J. Burke from Alan R. Silverstein regarding joint submission of draft Scheduling Order and Checklist - re Oral Order,,,,,. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A, # (2) Exhibit B)(Silverstein, Alan) |
| Oct 2, 2018 | N/A | Add Attorneys Pro Hac Vice (0) Docket Text: Pro Hac Vice Attorney Patrick N. Flynn for Samsung Electronics America, Inc.,Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (crb) |
| Oct 2, 2018 | N/A | Add Attorneys Pro Hac Vice (0) Docket Text: Pro Hac Vice Attorney Gregory S. Nieberg for Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (crb) |
| Oct 1, 2018 | N/A | Add Attorneys Pro Hac Vice (0) Docket Text: Pro Hac Vice Attorney Brian G. Bieluch for Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (dmp, ) |
| Sep 27, 2018 | N/A | SO ORDERED (0) Docket Text: SO ORDERED D.I. [14] MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Richard L. Rainey, Attorney Brian G. Bieluch, Attorney Paul J. Wilson, Attorney Hwa Young Jin, Attorney Gregory S. Nieberg and Attorney Patrick N. Flynn filed by Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd., Samsung Electronics America, Inc. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 9/27/2018. (dlb) |
| Sep 26, 2018 | N/A | Oral Order (0) Docket Text: ORAL ORDER: IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the parties shall meet and confer and discuss, in person and/or by telephone, each of the matters listed on Chief Judge Stark's Case Management Checklist ("Checklist"). Within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order, the parties shall jointly file the following: (i) a copy of the "Checklist" indicating the names of Lead Counsel and Delaware Counsel for each party; (ii) a proposed Scheduling Order (consistent with the Chief Judge Stark's Revised Patent Form Scheduling Order); and (iii) a letter, not to exceed three pages, that contains the following: (a) a description of what this case is about; (b) the parties' positions regarding the disputes in the proposed Scheduling Order, and (c) a list of the three most significant topics (other than Scheduling Order disputes) discussed during the parties' review of the Checklist items, along with a brief description as to what was discussed as to those topics. Thereafter, the Court will schedule a Case Management Conference/Rule 16 Scheduling Conference to be held with Judge Stark and/or Judge Burke. The Checklist and Revised Patent Form Scheduling Order can be found on this Court's website (www.ded.uscourts.gov/judge/chief-judge-leonard-p-stark). Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 9/26/2018. (dlb) |
| Sep 25, 2018 | 12 | Answer to Complaint (13) Docket Text: ANSWER to [1] Complaint, with Jury Demand by Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd..(Poff, Adam) |
| Sep 25, 2018 | 13 | Disclosure Statement (4) Docket Text: Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: identifying Corporate Parent Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. for Samsung Electronics America, Inc. filed by Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.. (Poff, Adam) |
| Sep 25, 2018 | 14 | Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice (10) Docket Text: MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Richard L. Rainey, Attorney Brian G. Bieluch, Attorney Paul J. Wilson, Attorney Hwa Young Jin, Attorney Gregory S. Nieberg and Attorney Patrick N. Flynn - filed by Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.. (Poff, Adam) |
| Sep 10, 2018 | N/A | Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Answer (0) Docket Text: ORAL ORDER: The Court, having reviewed Defendants' emergency motion seeking a second extension of time to answer the Complaint ("Motion"), (D.I. 10), and Plaintiff's response thereto, (D.I. 11), hereby ORDERS that the Motion is GRANTED and the deadline to move, answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint is now September 25, 2018. In light of the relative complexity of the case (which appears to involve a substantial number of accused products) and the relatively limited additional time called for by the requested extension (14 days), the extension is justified. The Court does not anticipate granting any further extensions. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 9/10/2018. (dlb) |
| Sep 10, 2018 | 11 | Answering Brief in Opposition (Main Document) (3) Docket Text: ANSWERING BRIEF in Opposition re [10] Emergency MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re [1] Complaint, filed by Satius Holding, Inc..Reply Brief due date per Local Rules is 9/17/2018. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit Exhibit 1)(Silverstein, Alan) |
| Sep 10, 2018 | 11 | Answering Brief in Opposition (Exhibit Exhibit 1) (7) Docket Text: ANSWERING BRIEF in Opposition re [10] Emergency MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re [1] Complaint, filed by Satius Holding, Inc..Reply Brief due date per Local Rules is 9/17/2018. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit Exhibit 1)(Silverstein, Alan) |
| Sep 7, 2018 | 10 | Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer (Main Document) (5) Docket Text: Emergency MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re [1] Complaint, - filed by Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A, # (2) Text of Proposed Order)(Poff, Adam) |
| Sep 7, 2018 | 10 | Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer (Exhibit A) (4) Docket Text: Emergency MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re [1] Complaint, - filed by Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A, # (2) Text of Proposed Order)(Poff, Adam) |
| Sep 7, 2018 | 10 | Motion for Extension of Time to File Answer (Text of Proposed Order) (1) Docket Text: Emergency MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re [1] Complaint, - filed by Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd.. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A, # (2) Text of Proposed Order)(Poff, Adam) |
| Jun 28, 2018 | N/A | SO ORDERED (0) Docket Text: SO ORDERED D.I. [9] STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for Samsung to answer, move or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint to September 11, 2018 filed by Satius Holding, Inc. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 6/28/2018. (dlb) |
| Jun 27, 2018 | 9 | Stipulation to EXTEND Time (2) Docket Text: STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for Samsung to answer, move or otherwise respond to Plaintiff's Complaint to September 11, 2018 - filed by Satius Holding, Inc.. (Silverstein, Alan) |
| Jun 26, 2018 | N/A | SO ORDERED (0) Docket Text: SO ORDERED D.I. [8] Proposed Procedures Order filed by Satius Holding, Inc. Ordered by Judge Christopher J. Burke on 6/26/2018. (dlb) |
| Jun 25, 2018 | 8 | Proposed Order (3) Docket Text: PROPOSED ORDER regarding Procedures by Satius Holding, Inc.. (Silverstein, Alan) |
| Jun 18, 2018 | N/A | Add Attorneys Pro Hac Vice (0) Docket Text: Pro Hac Vice Attorney Shannon H. Hedvat, Lisa Kobialka, Paul J. Andre, Greg Proctor for Satius Holding, Inc. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (crb) |
| Jun 18, 2018 | N/A | Order Referring Case to Magistrate Judge (0) Docket Text: ORAL REFERRAL ORDER: This case will be governed by Judge Stark's Revised Procedures for Managing Patent Cases (see www.ded.uscourts.gov). In accordance with the Revised Procedures, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: 1. any and all matters relating to scheduling, including entry of a Scheduling Order, are referred to Magistrate Judge Burke; 2. any and all motions to dismiss, stay, and/or transfer venue, relating to all or any part of the case, whenever such motions may be filed, are referred to Judge Burke for disposition or report and recommendation, to the full extent permitted by the Constitution, statute, and rule; and 3. within seven (7) days of the date of this Referral Order, the plaintiff(s) shall file the Procedures Order, which is found on Judge Stark's website (see www.ded.uscourts.gov). ORDERED by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 6/18/18. (ntl) |
| Jun 14, 2018 | N/A | SO ORDERED (0) Docket Text: SO ORDERED, re [6] MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Paul J. Andre, Lisa Kobialka, Greg Proctor and Shannon H. Hedvat filed by Satius Holding, Inc. Signed by Judge Leonard P. Stark on 6/14/18. (ntl) |
| Jun 13, 2018 | N/A | Case Assigned/Reassigned (0) Docket Text: Case Assigned to Judge Leonard P. Stark. Please include the initials of the Judge (LPS) after the case number on all documents filed. (rjb) |
| Jun 13, 2018 | 6 | Motion for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice (6) Docket Text: MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Paul J. Andre, Lisa Kobialka, Greg Proctor and Shannon H. Hedvat - filed by Satius Holding, Inc.. (Silverstein, Alan) |
| Jun 8, 2018 | 5 | Summons Returned Executed (2) Docket Text: SUMMONS Returned Executed by Satius Holding, Inc.. Samsung Electronics America, Inc. served on 6/7/2018, answer due 6/28/2018. (Silverstein, Alan) |
| Jun 6, 2018 | N/A | Summons Issued (0) Docket Text: Summons Issued with Magistrate Consent Notice attached as to Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. on 6/6/2018. Requesting party or attorney should pick up issued summons at the Help Desk, Room 4209, or call 302-573-6170 and ask the Clerk to mail the summons to them. (jcs) |
| Jun 5, 2018 | 1 | Complaint* (1) |
| Jun 5, 2018 | 1 | Complaint (Main Document) (18) Docket Text: COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT filed with Jury Demand against Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0311-2395456.) - filed by Satius Holding, Inc.. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1-9, # (2) Civil Cover Sheet)(jcs) |
| Jun 5, 2018 | 1 | Complaint (Exhibit 1-9) (30) Docket Text: COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT filed with Jury Demand against Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0311-2395456.) - filed by Satius Holding, Inc.. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1-9, # (2) Civil Cover Sheet)(jcs) |
| Jun 5, 2018 | 1 | Complaint (Civil Cover Sheet) (1) Docket Text: COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT filed with Jury Demand against Samsung Electronics America, Inc., Samsung Electronics Co., Ltd. - Magistrate Consent Notice to Pltf. ( Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0311-2395456.) - filed by Satius Holding, Inc.. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1-9, # (2) Civil Cover Sheet)(jcs) |
| Jun 5, 2018 | 2 | Magistrate Consent Forms (3) Docket Text: Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (jcs) |
| Jun 5, 2018 | 3 | Patent/Trademark Report to Commissioner (1) Docket Text: Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) US 6,711,385 B1. (jcs) |
| Jun 5, 2018 | 4 | Disclosure Statement (1) Docket Text: Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: identifying Corporate Parent Satius Inc. for Satius Holding, Inc. filed by Satius Holding, Inc. (jcs) |
