Signify North America Corporation et al v. Robe Lighting Inc et al > Documents

Date Field	Doc. No.	Description (Pages)
Nov 8, 2022	1	Complaint* (1)
Nov 8, 2022	1	Amended Complaint* (1)
Oct 27, 2022	130	Notice of Settlement (2) Docket Text: NOTICE of Settlement and Joint Motion to Suspend Deadlines for Thirty Days by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation (Leibell, Martha)
Oct 27, 2022	N/A	Order Dismissing/Closing Case (0) Docket Text: PAPERLESS NOTICE OF COURT PRACTICE. THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon the Parties' Notice of Settlement in Principle and Joint Motion to Suspend Deadlines for Thirty (30) Days. [130]. Therein, the Parties state that a settlement has been reached and request that the Court suspend its current deadlines for thirty (30) days to allow the parties to finalize the settlement. See id. The Parties are hereby directed to file a stipulation of dismissal of all claims signed by all parties pursuant to Rule 41(a) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure within thirty (30) days from the date of this Notice. If such papers are not filed within the time specified, this matter will be dismissed and the Court will be divested of jurisdiction to enforce the settlement agreement. The Clerk of Court is INSTRUCTED to ADMINISTRATIVELY CLOSE this case. All pending motions, if any, are DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by Judge K. Michael Moore on 10/27/2022. (fpi)
Sep 30, 2022	N/A	Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief (0) Docket Text: PAPERLESS ORDER. THIS CAUSE comes before the Court upon the Parties' Joint Motion for an Order Allowing Service of Updated Infringement and Invalidity Contentions. [128]. Therein, the Parties request that this Court permit the service of updated infringement contentions by Plaintiffs, and updated invalidity contentions by Defendants, pursuant to the Parties' Joint Case Management Status Report filed September 6, 2022. See id. at 1; see also [125]. Section 4 of the Court's Pretrial Order, [11], provides that "[a]mendment of the Infringement Contentions or the Invalidity Contentions may be made only by order of the Court upon a timely showing of good cause." Id. at 5. The Pretrial Order provides a non-exhaustive list of circumstances which may support such a finding, including "[a] claim construction by the Court different from that proposed by the party seeking amendment; [r]ecent discovery of material, prior art despite earlier diligent search; and [r]ecent discovery of nonpublic information about the Accused Instrumentality which was not discovered, despite diligent efforts, before the service of the Infringement Contentions." Id. In light of the above and for the reasons described in the Parties' Joint Motion, see [128] at 23, the Court finds that the Parties have demonstrated good cause for the amendments requested. Accordingly, UPON CONSIDERATION of the Joint Motion [128], the pertinent portions of the record, and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Joint Motion [128] is GRANTED. Plaintiffs are permitted to serve updated Infringement Contentions, and Defendants are permitted to serve updated Invalidity Contentions. Signed by Judge K. Michael Moore on 9/29/2022. (fpi)
Sep 22, 2022	128	Motion for Miscellaneous Relief (4) Docket Text: Joint MOTION for an Order Allowing Service of Updated Infringement and Invalidity Contentions by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. (Leibell, Martha)
Sep 12, 2022	N/A	Set/Reset Deadlines/Hearings (0) Docket Text: Set/Reset Deadlines/Hearings per DE [127] Mediation Deadline 1/15/2023. (pcs)
Sep 12, 2022	N/A	Scheduling Order (0) Docket Text: PAPERLESS ORDER SCHEDULING TRIAL IN FORT LAUDERDALE. This case is now set for trial commencing the two-week trial period of June 20, 2023, at 9 a.m. in the United States District Courthouse, 299 East Broward Boulevard, Fort Lauderdale, Florida. The assigned courtroom will be announced at the calendar call. All parties are directed to report to the calendar call on June 15, 2023, at 2 p.m., at which time all matters relating to the scheduled trial date may be brought to the attention of the Court. A final pretrial conference as provided for by Rule 16, Fed. R. Civ. P., and Rule 16.1(C), S.D. Fla. L.R., is scheduled for June 6, 2023, at 11 a.m. The calendar call and the final pretrial conference will take place in Courtroom 13-1 (thirteenth floor), United States District Courthouse, 400 North Miami Avenue, Miami, Florida. A bilateral pretrial stipulation and all other pretrial preparations shall be completed NO LATER THAN FIVE DAYS PRIOR TO THE PRETRIAL CONFERENCE. All motions to amend the pleadings or to join additional parties must be filed by the later of forty-five (45) days after the date of entry of this Order, or forty-five (45) days after the first responsive pleading by the last responding defendant. Any and all pretrial motions, including motions for summary judgment, Daubert motions, and motions in limine must be filed no later than eighty (80) days prior to the trial date. Responses to summary judgment motions must be filed no later than fourteen (14) days after service of the motion, and replies in support of the motion must be filed no later than seven (7) days after service of the response, with both deadlines computed as specified in Rule 6, Fed. R. Civ. P. The Parties are hereby notified that this Court requires strict compliance with Local Rule 56.1 regarding the filing of any motion for summary judgment and corresponding statements of material facts. For evidence not previously filed on the docket, and to the extent practicable, evidentiary support for a Party's statement of material facts shall be filed as separate exhibits within the Court's electronic case filing system; the first citation to any evidence in support of a motion for summary judgment or statement of material facts shall provide the docket entry for that evidence using the form "ECF No." In all circumstances, citations to any composite exhibit shall provide both the page number assigned by the Court's electronic case filing system (i.e., the page number of the PDF) and the page number of the document. Each party is limited to one Daubert motion. If all evidentiary issues cannot be addressed in a 20-page memorandum, the parties must file for leave to exceed the page limit. Each party is also limited to one motion in limine (other than Daubert motions). If all evidentiary issues cannot be addressed in a 20-page memorandum, the parties must file for leave to exceed the page limit. Rule 26(a)(2) expert disclosures shall be completed one hundred thirty (130) days prior to the date of trial. All discovery, including expert discovery, shall be completed one hundred (100) days prior to the date of trial. The failure to engage in discovery pending settlement negotiations shall not be grounds for continuance of the trial date. All exhibits must be pre-marked, and a typewritten exhibit list setting forth the number and description of each exhibit must be submitted at the time of trial. Plaintiff's exhibits shall be marked numerically with the letter "P" as a prefix. Defendant's exhibits shall be marked numerically with the letter "D" as a prefix. For a jury trial, counsel shall prepare and submit proposed jury instructions to the Court. The Parties shall submit their proposed jury instructions and verdict form jointly, although they do not need to agree on each proposed instruction. Where the parties do not agree on a proposed instruction, that instruction shall be set forth in bold type. Instructions proposed only by a plaintiff should be underlined. Instructions proposed only by a defendant should be italicized. Every instruction must be supported by citation to authority. The parties should use the Eleventh Circuit Pattern Jury Instructions for Civil Cases as a guide, including the directions to counsel contained therein. The parties shall jointly file their proposed jury instructions via CM/ECF, and shall also submit their proposed jury instructions to the Court via e-mail at moore@flsd.uscourts.gov in WordPerfect or Word format. For a non-jury trial, the parties shall prepare and submit to the Court proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law fully supported by the evidence, which counsel expects the trial to develop, and fully supported by citations to law. The proposed jury instructions or the proposed findings of fact and conclusions of law shall be submitted to the Court no later than five (5) business days prior to the scheduled trial date. Pursuant to Administrative Order 2016-70 of the Southern District of Florida and consistent with the Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit's Local Rules and Internal Operating Procedures, within three days of the conclusion of a trial or other proceeding, parties must file via CM/ECF electronic versions of documentary exhibits admitted into evidence, including photographs of non-documentary physical exhibits. The Parties are directed to comply with each of the requirements set forth in Administrative Order 2016-70 unless directed otherwise by the Court. THE FILING BY COUNSEL OF A "NOTICE OF UNAVAILABILITY" BY MOTION OR OTHERWISE IS NOT PROVIDED FOR UNDER THE LOCAL RULES AND SHALL NOT BE PRESUMED TO ALTER OR MODIFY THE COURT'S SCHEDULING ORDER. Signed by Judge K. Michael Moore on 9/12/2022. (fpi) Pattern Jury Instruction Builder - To access the latest, up to date changes to the 11th Circuit Pattern Jury Instructions go to https://pji.ca11.uscourts.gov or click here.
Sep 12, 2022	N/A	Order Referring Case to Mediation (0) Docket Text: PAPERLESS ORDER. THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon a sua sponte examination of the record. On May 3, 2021, the Court entered a Paperless Order referring the parties to mediation. See (ECF No. 42). The Parties conducted a mediation on June 3, 2021, and the mediator declared that the parties met an impasse. [53] Yet the Mediation Report notes that both [t]he parties and the mediator are open to reconvening mediation in the future. Id. More than a year has elapsed since the Parties last attempt at mediation, and the Court has recently entered its Order on Claim Construction, [124]. In light of these circumstances, the Court finds that further mediation is appropriate. Accordingly, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that, pursuant to Local Rule 16.2 of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, the Parties SHALL participate in a second mediation on or before January 15, 2023. Within five (5) days following the mediation conference, the mediator shall file a Mediation Report indicating whether all required parties were present. The report shall also indicate whether the case settled (in full or in part), was continued with the consent of the parties, or whether the mediator declared an impasse. The parties shall agree upon a place, date, and time for mediation convenient to the mediator, counsel of record, and unrepresented parties and file a Notice of Scheduling Mediation on or before November 15, 2021. Signed by Judge K. Michael Moore on 9/12/2022. (fpi)
Sep 6, 2022	125	Status Report (12) Docket Text: STATUS REPORT JOINT CASE MANAGEMENT by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation (Leibell, Martha)
Aug 4, 2022	124	Order (30) Docket Text: ORDER on Claim Construction. Signed by Judge K. Michael Moore on 8/4/2022. See attached document for full details. (elm)
Jul 31, 2022	123	Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief (7) Docket Text: ORDER granting [118] Plaintiffs' Motion to Allow In-House Counsel Access to Highly Confidential Information Under the Stipulated Protective Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lauren Fleischer Louis on 7/31/2022. See attached document for full details. (nce)
Jul 5, 2022	120	Reply to Response to Motion (11) Docket Text: REPLY to Response to Motion re [118] Plaintiff's MOTION to Allow In-House Counsel Access to Highly Confidential Information filed by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. (Leibell, Martha)
Jul 5, 2022	121	Transcript (74) Docket Text: TRANSCRIPT of Tutorial Hearing held on 12/20/2021 before Judge K. Michael Moore, Volume Number 1 of 1, 1 - 74 pages, Court Reporter: Sharon Velazco, 305-523-5636 / Sharon_PellVelazco@flsd.uscourts.gov. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased by contacting the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 7/26/2022. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 8/5/2022. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 10/3/2022. (Pell Velazco, Sharon)
Jul 5, 2022	122	Transcript (132) Docket Text: TRANSCRIPT of Claim Construction Hearing held on 12/20/2021 before Judge K. Michael Moore, 1 - 132 pages, Court Reporter: Sharon Velazco, 305-523-5636 / Sharon_PellVelazco@flsd.uscourts.gov. Transcript may be viewed at the court public terminal or purchased by contacting the Court Reporter/Transcriber before the deadline for Release of Transcript Restriction. After that date it may be obtained through PACER. Redaction Request due 7/26/2022. Redacted Transcript Deadline set for 8/5/2022. Release of Transcript Restriction set for 10/3/2022. (Pell Velazco, Sharon)
Jun 27, 2022	119	Response in Opposition to Motion (Main Document) (14) Docket Text: RESPONSE in Opposition re [118] Plaintiff's MOTION to Allow In-House Counsel Access to Highly Confidential Information filed by Robe Lighting Inc, Robe Lighting S.R.O.. Replies due by 7/5/2022. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1 - Signify LED Patent Licensing Flyer)(Brafman, David)
Jun 27, 2022	119	Response in Opposition to Motion (Exhibit 1 - Signify LED Patent Licensing Flyer) (2) Docket Text: RESPONSE in Opposition re [118] Plaintiff's MOTION to Allow In-House Counsel Access to Highly Confidential Information filed by Robe Lighting Inc, Robe Lighting S.R.O.. Replies due by 7/5/2022. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1 - Signify LED Patent Licensing Flyer)(Brafman, David)
Jun 13, 2022	118	Motion for Miscellaneous Relief (Main Document) (12) Docket Text: Plaintiff's MOTION to Allow In-House Counsel Access to Highly Confidential Information by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A, # (2) Exhibit B, # (3) Exhibit C, # (4) Exhibit D, # (5) Exhibit E, # (6) Exhibit F, # (7) Exhibit G, # (8) Exhibit H, # (9) Exhibit I, # (10) Exhibit J)(Leibell, Martha)
Jun 13, 2022	118	Motion for Miscellaneous Relief (Exhibit A) (2) Docket Text: Plaintiff's MOTION to Allow In-House Counsel Access to Highly Confidential Information by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A, # (2) Exhibit B, # (3) Exhibit C, # (4) Exhibit D, # (5) Exhibit E, # (6) Exhibit F, # (7) Exhibit G, # (8) Exhibit H, # (9) Exhibit I, # (10) Exhibit J)(Leibell, Martha)
Jun 13, 2022	118	Motion for Miscellaneous Relief (Exhibit B) (3) Docket Text: Plaintiff's MOTION to Allow In-House Counsel Access to Highly Confidential Information by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A, # (2) Exhibit B, # (3) Exhibit C, # (4) Exhibit D, # (5) Exhibit E, # (6) Exhibit F, # (7) Exhibit G, # (8) Exhibit H, # (9) Exhibit I, # (10) Exhibit J)(Leibell, Martha)
Jun 13, 2022	118	Motion for Miscellaneous Relief (Exhibit C) (3) Docket Text: Plaintiff's MOTION to Allow In-House Counsel Access to Highly Confidential Information by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A, # (2) Exhibit B, # (3) Exhibit C, # (4) Exhibit D, # (5) Exhibit E, # (6) Exhibit F, # (7) Exhibit G, # (8) Exhibit H, # (9) Exhibit I, # (10) Exhibit J)(Leibell, Martha)
Jun 13, 2022	118	Motion for Miscellaneous Relief (Exhibit D) (3) Docket Text: Plaintiff's MOTION to Allow In-House Counsel Access to Highly Confidential Information by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A, # (2) Exhibit B, # (3) Exhibit C, # (4) Exhibit D, # (5) Exhibit E, # (6) Exhibit F, # (7) Exhibit G, # (8) Exhibit H, # (9) Exhibit I, # (10) Exhibit J)(Leibell, Martha)
Jun 13, 2022	118	Motion for Miscellaneous Relief (Exhibit E) (3) Docket Text: Plaintiff's MOTION to Allow In-House Counsel Access to Highly Confidential Information by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A, # (2) Exhibit B, # (3) Exhibit C, # (4) Exhibit D, # (5) Exhibit E, # (6) Exhibit F, # (7) Exhibit G, # (8) Exhibit H, # (9) Exhibit I, # (10) Exhibit J)(Leibell, Martha)
Jun 13, 2022	118	Motion for Miscellaneous Relief (Exhibit F) (2) Docket Text: Plaintiff's MOTION to Allow In-House Counsel Access to Highly Confidential Information by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A, # (2) Exhibit B, # (3) Exhibit C, # (4) Exhibit D, # (5) Exhibit E, # (6) Exhibit F, # (7) Exhibit G, # (8) Exhibit H, # (9) Exhibit I, # (10) Exhibit J)(Leibell, Martha)
Jun 13, 2022	118	Motion for Miscellaneous Relief (Exhibit G) (14) Docket Text: Plaintiff's MOTION to Allow In-House Counsel Access to Highly Confidential Information by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A, # (2) Exhibit B, # (3) Exhibit C, # (4) Exhibit D, # (5) Exhibit E, # (6) Exhibit F, # (7) Exhibit G, # (8) Exhibit H, # (9) Exhibit I, # (10) Exhibit J)(Leibell, Martha)
Jun 13, 2022	118	Motion for Miscellaneous Relief (Exhibit H) (9) Docket Text: Plaintiff's MOTION to Allow In-House Counsel Access to Highly Confidential Information by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A, # (2) Exhibit B, # (3) Exhibit C, # (4) Exhibit D, # (5) Exhibit E, # (6) Exhibit F, # (7) Exhibit G, # (8) Exhibit H, # (9) Exhibit I, # (10) Exhibit J)(Leibell, Martha)
Jun 13, 2022	118	Motion for Miscellaneous Relief (Exhibit I) (18) Docket Text: Plaintiff's MOTION to Allow In-House Counsel Access to Highly Confidential Information by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A, # (2) Exhibit B, # (3) Exhibit C, # (4) Exhibit D, # (5) Exhibit E, # (6) Exhibit F, # (7) Exhibit G, # (8) Exhibit H, # (9) Exhibit I, # (10) Exhibit J)(Leibell, Martha)
Jun 13, 2022	118	Motion for Miscellaneous Relief (Exhibit J) (19) Docket Text: Plaintiff's MOTION to Allow In-House Counsel Access to Highly Confidential Information by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A, # (2) Exhibit B, # (3) Exhibit C, # (4) Exhibit D, # (5) Exhibit E, # (6) Exhibit F, # (7) Exhibit G, # (8) Exhibit H, # (9) Exhibit I, # (10) Exhibit J)(Leibell, Martha)
Jun 10, 2022	115	Motion for Miscellaneous Relief (11) Docket Text: STRICKEN Plaintiff's MOTION To Allow In-House Counsel Access to Highly Confidential Information Under the Stipulated Protective Order and Incorporated Memorandum of Law by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. (Reiss, Andrew) Modified per DE [117] Order on 6/13/2022 (ebz).
Jun 10, 2022	116	Motion to Strike (2) Docket Text: Plaintiff's MOTION to Strike [115] Plaintiff's MOTION To Allow In-House Counsel Access to Highly Confidential Information Under the Stipulated Protective Order and Incorporated Memorandum of Law by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. Responses due by 6/24/2022 (Reiss, Andrew)
Jun 10, 2022	N/A	Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief (0) Docket Text: PAPERLESS ORDER GRANTING [116] Plaintiffs' Motion to Strike and STRIKING [115] Plaintiffs' Motion. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lauren Fleischer Louis on 6/10/2022. (nce)
Jun 9, 2022	N/A	Order (0) Docket Text: PAPERLESS ORDER VACATING [20] DISCOVERY PROCEDURES ORDER. Parties are instructed to review the Discovery Practices and Procedures that can be found on the undersigned's webpage. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lauren Fleischer Louis on 6/9/2022. (nce)
Jun 8, 2022	N/A	Case Reassignment of Paired Magistrate Judge (0) Docket Text: Case Reassignment of Paired Magistrate Judge pursuant to Administrative Order(s) - 2022-47 to Magistrate Judge Lauren Fleischer Louis. Magistrate Judge Jared M. Strauss no longer assigned to case. (bms)
Jun 1, 2022	N/A	Case Reassignment of Paired Magistrate Judge (0) Docket Text: Case Reassignment of Paired Magistrate Judge to Magistrate Judge Jared M. Strauss. Magistrate Judge Lurana S. Snow no longer assigned to case. (jmd)
Mar 10, 2022	111	Order on Motion to Compel (17) Docket Text: ORDER granting in part and denying in part [103] Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel with respect to Plaintiffs' Second Set of Requests for Production of Documents and Things. See attached document for full details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lurana S. Snow on 3/10/2022. (qhq)
Feb 16, 2022	110	Reply to Response to Motion (5) Docket Text: Plaintiff's REPLY to Response to Motion re [103] Plaintiff's MOTION to Compel Discovery and Incorporated Memorandum of Law filed by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. (Reiss, Andrew)
Feb 15, 2022	109	Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief (1) Docket Text: ORDER granting [108] Joint Motion for Entry of Proposed Order Regarding Production of License Agreements. See attached document for full details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lurana S. Snow on 2/15/2022. (qhq)
Feb 14, 2022	107	Stipulation (Main Document) (4) Docket Text: STIPULATION for Entry of Proposed Court Order for the Production of License Agreements by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation (Attachments: # (1) Text of Proposed Order)(Reiss, Andrew)
Feb 14, 2022	107	Stipulation (Text of Proposed Order) (1) Docket Text: STIPULATION for Entry of Proposed Court Order for the Production of License Agreements by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation (Attachments: # (1) Text of Proposed Order)(Reiss, Andrew)
Feb 14, 2022	108	Motion for Miscellaneous Relief (Main Document) (4) Docket Text: Joint MOTION For Entry of Proposed Order for the Production of License Agreements by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. (Attachments: # (1) Text of Proposed Order)(Reiss, Andrew)
Feb 14, 2022	108	Motion for Miscellaneous Relief (Text of Proposed Order) (1) Docket Text: Joint MOTION For Entry of Proposed Order for the Production of License Agreements by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. (Attachments: # (1) Text of Proposed Order)(Reiss, Andrew)
Feb 9, 2022	106	Response in Opposition to Motion (7) Docket Text: RESPONSE in Opposition re [103] Plaintiff's MOTION to Compel Discovery and Incorporated Memorandum of Law filed by Robe Lighting Inc, Robe Lighting S.R.O.. Replies due by 2/16/2022. (Brafman, David)
Jan 27, 2022	N/A	Order on Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice (0) Docket Text: PAPERLESS ORDER. THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon Defendants Robe Lighting, Inc. and Robe Lighting s.r.o.'s [104] Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing as to Dean A. Dickie, Esq. UPON CONSIDERATION of the Motion, the pertinent portions of the record, and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Motion [104] is GRANTED. Dean A. Dickie may appear pro hac vice in this matter. The Clerk of Court shall provide electronic notification of all electronic filings to dean.dickie@akerman.com. Signed by Judge K. Michael Moore on 1/27/2022. (elm)
Jan 26, 2022	103	Motion to Compel (Main Document) (7) Docket Text: Plaintiff's MOTION to Compel Discovery and Incorporated Memorandum of Law by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. Responses due by 2/9/2022 (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit Exhibit 2, # (3) Exhibit Exhibit 3, # (4) Exhibit Exhibit 4, # (5) Exhibit Exhibit 5, # (6) Exhibit Exhibit 6, # (7) Exhibit Exhibit 7)(Reiss, Andrew)
Jan 26, 2022	103	Motion to Compel (Exhibit Exhibit 1) (7) Docket Text: Plaintiff's MOTION to Compel Discovery and Incorporated Memorandum of Law by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. Responses due by 2/9/2022 (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit Exhibit 2, # (3) Exhibit Exhibit 3, # (4) Exhibit Exhibit 4, # (5) Exhibit Exhibit 5, # (6) Exhibit Exhibit 6, # (7) Exhibit Exhibit 7)(Reiss, Andrew)
Jan 26, 2022	103	Motion to Compel (Exhibit Exhibit 2) (14) Docket Text: Plaintiff's MOTION to Compel Discovery and Incorporated Memorandum of Law by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. Responses due by 2/9/2022 (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit Exhibit 2, # (3) Exhibit Exhibit 3, # (4) Exhibit Exhibit 4, # (5) Exhibit Exhibit 5, # (6) Exhibit Exhibit 6, # (7) Exhibit Exhibit 7)(Reiss, Andrew)
Jan 26, 2022	103	Motion to Compel (Exhibit Exhibit 3) (3) Docket Text: Plaintiff's MOTION to Compel Discovery and Incorporated Memorandum of Law by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. Responses due by 2/9/2022 (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit Exhibit 2, # (3) Exhibit Exhibit 3, # (4) Exhibit Exhibit 4, # (5) Exhibit Exhibit 5, # (6) Exhibit Exhibit 6, # (7) Exhibit Exhibit 7)(Reiss, Andrew)
Jan 26, 2022	103	Motion to Compel (Exhibit Exhibit 4) (9) Docket Text: Plaintiff's MOTION to Compel Discovery and Incorporated Memorandum of Law by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. Responses due by 2/9/2022 (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit Exhibit 2, # (3) Exhibit Exhibit 3, # (4) Exhibit Exhibit 4, # (5) Exhibit Exhibit 5, # (6) Exhibit Exhibit 6, # (7) Exhibit Exhibit 7)(Reiss, Andrew)
Jan 26, 2022	103	Motion to Compel (Exhibit Exhibit 5) (11) Docket Text: Plaintiff's MOTION to Compel Discovery and Incorporated Memorandum of Law by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. Responses due by 2/9/2022 (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit Exhibit 2, # (3) Exhibit Exhibit 3, # (4) Exhibit Exhibit 4, # (5) Exhibit Exhibit 5, # (6) Exhibit Exhibit 6, # (7) Exhibit Exhibit 7)(Reiss, Andrew)
Jan 26, 2022	103	Motion to Compel (Exhibit Exhibit 6) (12) Docket Text: Plaintiff's MOTION to Compel Discovery and Incorporated Memorandum of Law by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. Responses due by 2/9/2022 (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit Exhibit 2, # (3) Exhibit Exhibit 3, # (4) Exhibit Exhibit 4, # (5) Exhibit Exhibit 5, # (6) Exhibit Exhibit 6, # (7) Exhibit Exhibit 7)(Reiss, Andrew)
Jan 26, 2022	103	Motion to Compel (Exhibit Exhibit 7) (15) Docket Text: Plaintiff's MOTION to Compel Discovery and Incorporated Memorandum of Law by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. Responses due by 2/9/2022 (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit Exhibit 2, # (3) Exhibit Exhibit 3, # (4) Exhibit Exhibit 4, # (5) Exhibit Exhibit 5, # (6) Exhibit Exhibit 6, # (7) Exhibit Exhibit 7)(Reiss, Andrew)
Jan 26, 2022	104	Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Main Document) (3) Docket Text: MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing for Dean A. Dickie. Filing Fee $ 200.00 Receipt # AFLSDC-15350685 by Robe Lighting Inc, Robe Lighting S.R.O.. Responses due by 2/9/2022 (Attachments: # (1) Certification of Dean A. Dickie)(Brafman, David)
Jan 26, 2022	104	Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice (Certification of Dean A. Dickie) (1) Docket Text: MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing for Dean A. Dickie. Filing Fee $ 200.00 Receipt # AFLSDC-15350685 by Robe Lighting Inc, Robe Lighting S.R.O.. Responses due by 2/9/2022 (Attachments: # (1) Certification of Dean A. Dickie)(Brafman, David)
Jan 19, 2022	102	Stipulation (4) Docket Text: STIPULATION Regarding Entry of Proposed Court Order for the Production of License Agreements by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation (Reiss, Andrew)
Dec 21, 2021	N/A	Miscellaneous Hearing (0) Docket Text: PAPERLESS Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge K. Michael Moore: Tutorial held on 12/20/2021. Total time in court: 1 hour(s) : 40 minutes. Attorney Appearance(s): Jeremy P. Oczek and Martha Anne Leibell on behalf of Plaintiffs; David S. Brafman and Mark David Passler on behalf of Defendants. Other appearances: Malvin C. Teich. Court Reporter: Sharon Velazco, 305-523-5636 / Sharon_PellVelazco@flsd.uscourts.gov. (elm)
Dec 21, 2021	N/A	Markman Hearing (0) Docket Text: PAPERLESS Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge K. Michael Moore: Markman Hearing held on 12/20/2021. Total time in court: 3 hour(s). Attorney Appearance(s): Jeremy P. Oczek and Martha Anne Leibell for Plaintiffs; David S. Brafman and Mark David Passler for Defendants. Court Reporter: Sharon Velazco, 305-523-5636 / Sharon_PellVelazco@flsd.uscourts.gov. (elm)
Dec 21, 2021	101	Notice (Other) (Main Document) (2) Docket Text: NOTICE by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation of Filing Claim Construction Presentation Slides (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1) (Leibell, Martha)
Dec 21, 2021	101	Notice (Other) (Exhibit 1) (30) Docket Text: NOTICE by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation of Filing Claim Construction Presentation Slides (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1) (Leibell, Martha)
Nov 24, 2021	N/A	Order on Motion for Hearing (0) Docket Text: PAPERLESS ORDER. THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon the Parties' Joint Motion to Schedule Claim Construction Hearing. [97]. Therein, the Parties request that the Court schedule a Claim Construction Hearing. Id. at 1. The Parties have completed their claim construction briefing and the next step in this case is for the Court to hold a tutorial presentation and claim construction hearing. UPON CONSIDERATION of the Joint Motion to Schedule Claim Construction Hearing [97], the Updated Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement [82], the Patent Pretrial Order [11], the pertinent portions of the record and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Joint Motion [97] is GRANTED. A tutorial and claim construction hearing shall take place on December 20, 2021 before the Honorable K. Michael Moore, U.S. District Judge, in Courtroom 13-1 (thirteenth floor), United States Courthouse, 400 North Miami Avenue, Miami, Florida. The tutorial shall take place at 10:30 a.m. The claim construction hearing shall begin at 1:00 p.m. Pursuant to the Patent Pretrial Order [11], at the tutorial presentation, "[e]ach side will be permitted 30-45 minutes to present a short summary and explanation of the technology at issue. The patent holder makes the first presentation. Visual aids are encouraged. The Court prefers that someone other than counsel make the presentation. No argument will be permitted. The proceeding is not recorded and parties may not rely on statements made at the tutorial in other aspects of the litigation." [11] at 10. Signed by Judge K. Michael Moore on 11/24/2021. (elm)
Nov 18, 2021	97	Motion for Hearing (2) Docket Text: Joint MOTION for Hearing on Claim Construction by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. (Reiss, Andrew)
Nov 10, 2021	96	Order on Motion to Compel (9) Docket Text: ORDER granting in part and denying in part [87] Defendants Motion to Compel Interrogatory Responses. See attached document for full details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lurana S. Snow on 11/10/2021. (qhq)
Nov 4, 2021	95	Response/Reply (Other) (Main Document) (15) Docket Text: REPLY to [88] Notice (Other),,, Responsive Claim Construction Brief by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit Exhibit 2, # (3) Exhibit Exhibit 3, # (4) Exhibit Exhibit 4, # (5) Exhibit Exhibit 5)(Reiss, Andrew)
Nov 4, 2021	95	Response/Reply (Other) (Exhibit Exhibit 1) (6) Docket Text: REPLY to [88] Notice (Other),,, Responsive Claim Construction Brief by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit Exhibit 2, # (3) Exhibit Exhibit 3, # (4) Exhibit Exhibit 4, # (5) Exhibit Exhibit 5)(Reiss, Andrew)
Nov 4, 2021	95	Response/Reply (Other) (Exhibit Exhibit 2) (5) Docket Text: REPLY to [88] Notice (Other),,, Responsive Claim Construction Brief by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit Exhibit 2, # (3) Exhibit Exhibit 3, # (4) Exhibit Exhibit 4, # (5) Exhibit Exhibit 5)(Reiss, Andrew)
Nov 4, 2021	95	Response/Reply (Other) (Exhibit Exhibit 3) (3) Docket Text: REPLY to [88] Notice (Other),,, Responsive Claim Construction Brief by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit Exhibit 2, # (3) Exhibit Exhibit 3, # (4) Exhibit Exhibit 4, # (5) Exhibit Exhibit 5)(Reiss, Andrew)
Nov 4, 2021	95	Response/Reply (Other) (Exhibit Exhibit 4) (16) Docket Text: REPLY to [88] Notice (Other),,, Responsive Claim Construction Brief by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit Exhibit 2, # (3) Exhibit Exhibit 3, # (4) Exhibit Exhibit 4, # (5) Exhibit Exhibit 5)(Reiss, Andrew)
Nov 4, 2021	95	Response/Reply (Other) (Exhibit Exhibit 5) (5) Docket Text: REPLY to [88] Notice (Other),,, Responsive Claim Construction Brief by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit Exhibit 2, # (3) Exhibit Exhibit 3, # (4) Exhibit Exhibit 4, # (5) Exhibit Exhibit 5)(Reiss, Andrew)
Oct 29, 2021	94	Reply to Response to Motion (5) Docket Text: REPLY to Response to Motion re [87] MOTION to Compel Interrogatory Responses filed by Robe Lighting Inc, Robe Lighting S.R.O.. (Brafman, David)
Oct 27, 2021	92	Notice (Other) (Main Document) (1) Docket Text: NOTICE by Robe Lighting Inc, Robe Lighting S.R.O. re [88] Notice (Other),,, Defendants' Notice of Filing (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 11 to Defendants Claim Construction Brief) (Brafman, David)
Oct 27, 2021	92	Notice (Other) (Exhibit 11 to Defendants Claim Construction Brief) (27) Docket Text: NOTICE by Robe Lighting Inc, Robe Lighting S.R.O. re [88] Notice (Other),,, Defendants' Notice of Filing (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 11 to Defendants Claim Construction Brief) (Brafman, David)
Oct 27, 2021	93	Notice of Striking (1) Docket Text: NOTICE of Striking [89] Notice (Other) filed by Robe Lighting S.R.O., Robe Lighting s.r.o., Robe Lighting Inc by Robe Lighting Inc, Robe Lighting S.R.O. (Brafman, David)
Oct 22, 2021	89	Notice (Other) (27) Docket Text: STRICKEN NOTICE of Filing Exhibit 11 to Defendants' Responsive Claim Construction Brief by Robe Lighting Inc, Robe Lighting S.R.O. re [88] Notice (Other), (Brafman, David) Modified per DE# [93] Notice of Striking on 10/27/2021 (ebz).
Oct 22, 2021	N/A	Clerk's Notice of Docket Correction and Instruction to Filer - Attorney (0) Docket Text: Clerks Notice to Filer re [89] Notice (Other). Document Not Captioned; CORRECTIVE ACTION REQUIRED - The Filer must File a Notice of Striking, then refile the document with the proper caption pursuant to Local Rules. (jas)
Oct 22, 2021	91	Response in Opposition to Motion (Main Document) (7) Docket Text: RESPONSE in Opposition re [87] MOTION to Compel Interrogatory Responses filed by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. Replies due by 10/29/2021. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit Exhibit 2)(Reiss, Andrew)
Oct 22, 2021	91	Response in Opposition to Motion (Exhibit Exhibit 1) (15) Docket Text: RESPONSE in Opposition re [87] MOTION to Compel Interrogatory Responses filed by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. Replies due by 10/29/2021. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit Exhibit 2)(Reiss, Andrew)
Oct 22, 2021	91	Response in Opposition to Motion (Exhibit Exhibit 2) (14) Docket Text: RESPONSE in Opposition re [87] MOTION to Compel Interrogatory Responses filed by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. Replies due by 10/29/2021. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit Exhibit 2)(Reiss, Andrew)
Oct 21, 2021	88	Notice (Other) (Main Document) (30) Docket Text: NOTICE of Filing Defendants Responsive Claim Construction Brief by Robe Lighting Inc, Robe Lighting S.R.O. re [86] Statement, (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1 - Modern dictionary of electronics, # (2) Exhibit 2 - Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary, # (3) Exhibit 3 - U.S. Patent No. 6,612,704, # (4) Exhibit 4 - U.S. Patent No. 6,830,341, # (5) Exhibit 5 - Declaration of Dr. Alfred Ducharme with Ex. C, # (6) Exhibit 6 - U.S. Patent No. 7,014,336, # (7) Exhibit 7 - SPIE, Color Temperature and CCT, # (8) Exhibit 8 - Wikipedia, Color Temperature, # (9) Exhibit 9 - Excerpts of: Transcript from Deposition of Dr. Alfred Ducharme, # (10) Exhibit 10 - Curriculum vitae of Dr. Alfred Ducharme, # (11) Exhibit 12, # (12) Exhibit 13, # (13) Exhibit 14, # (14) Exhibit 15, # (15) Exhibit 16, # (16) Exhibit 17) (Brafman, David)
Oct 21, 2021	88	Notice (Other) (Exhibit 1 - Modern dictionary of electronics) (7) Docket Text: NOTICE of Filing Defendants Responsive Claim Construction Brief by Robe Lighting Inc, Robe Lighting S.R.O. re [86] Statement, (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1 - Modern dictionary of electronics, # (2) Exhibit 2 - Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary, # (3) Exhibit 3 - U.S. Patent No. 6,612,704, # (4) Exhibit 4 - U.S. Patent No. 6,830,341, # (5) Exhibit 5 - Declaration of Dr. Alfred Ducharme with Ex. C, # (6) Exhibit 6 - U.S. Patent No. 7,014,336, # (7) Exhibit 7 - SPIE, Color Temperature and CCT, # (8) Exhibit 8 - Wikipedia, Color Temperature, # (9) Exhibit 9 - Excerpts of: Transcript from Deposition of Dr. Alfred Ducharme, # (10) Exhibit 10 - Curriculum vitae of Dr. Alfred Ducharme, # (11) Exhibit 12, # (12) Exhibit 13, # (13) Exhibit 14, # (14) Exhibit 15, # (15) Exhibit 16, # (16) Exhibit 17) (Brafman, David)
Oct 21, 2021	88	Notice (Other) (Exhibit 2 - Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary) (2) Docket Text: NOTICE of Filing Defendants Responsive Claim Construction Brief by Robe Lighting Inc, Robe Lighting S.R.O. re [86] Statement, (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1 - Modern dictionary of electronics, # (2) Exhibit 2 - Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary, # (3) Exhibit 3 - U.S. Patent No. 6,612,704, # (4) Exhibit 4 - U.S. Patent No. 6,830,341, # (5) Exhibit 5 - Declaration of Dr. Alfred Ducharme with Ex. C, # (6) Exhibit 6 - U.S. Patent No. 7,014,336, # (7) Exhibit 7 - SPIE, Color Temperature and CCT, # (8) Exhibit 8 - Wikipedia, Color Temperature, # (9) Exhibit 9 - Excerpts of: Transcript from Deposition of Dr. Alfred Ducharme, # (10) Exhibit 10 - Curriculum vitae of Dr. Alfred Ducharme, # (11) Exhibit 12, # (12) Exhibit 13, # (13) Exhibit 14, # (14) Exhibit 15, # (15) Exhibit 16, # (16) Exhibit 17) (Brafman, David)
Oct 21, 2021	88	Notice (Other) (Exhibit 3 - U.S. Patent No. 6,612,704) (20) Docket Text: NOTICE of Filing Defendants Responsive Claim Construction Brief by Robe Lighting Inc, Robe Lighting S.R.O. re [86] Statement, (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1 - Modern dictionary of electronics, # (2) Exhibit 2 - Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary, # (3) Exhibit 3 - U.S. Patent No. 6,612,704, # (4) Exhibit 4 - U.S. Patent No. 6,830,341, # (5) Exhibit 5 - Declaration of Dr. Alfred Ducharme with Ex. C, # (6) Exhibit 6 - U.S. Patent No. 7,014,336, # (7) Exhibit 7 - SPIE, Color Temperature and CCT, # (8) Exhibit 8 - Wikipedia, Color Temperature, # (9) Exhibit 9 - Excerpts of: Transcript from Deposition of Dr. Alfred Ducharme, # (10) Exhibit 10 - Curriculum vitae of Dr. Alfred Ducharme, # (11) Exhibit 12, # (12) Exhibit 13, # (13) Exhibit 14, # (14) Exhibit 15, # (15) Exhibit 16, # (16) Exhibit 17) (Brafman, David)
Oct 21, 2021	88	Notice (Other) (Exhibit 4 - U.S. Patent No. 6,830,341) (23) Docket Text: NOTICE of Filing Defendants Responsive Claim Construction Brief by Robe Lighting Inc, Robe Lighting S.R.O. re [86] Statement, (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1 - Modern dictionary of electronics, # (2) Exhibit 2 - Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary, # (3) Exhibit 3 - U.S. Patent No. 6,612,704, # (4) Exhibit 4 - U.S. Patent No. 6,830,341, # (5) Exhibit 5 - Declaration of Dr. Alfred Ducharme with Ex. C, # (6) Exhibit 6 - U.S. Patent No. 7,014,336, # (7) Exhibit 7 - SPIE, Color Temperature and CCT, # (8) Exhibit 8 - Wikipedia, Color Temperature, # (9) Exhibit 9 - Excerpts of: Transcript from Deposition of Dr. Alfred Ducharme, # (10) Exhibit 10 - Curriculum vitae of Dr. Alfred Ducharme, # (11) Exhibit 12, # (12) Exhibit 13, # (13) Exhibit 14, # (14) Exhibit 15, # (15) Exhibit 16, # (16) Exhibit 17) (Brafman, David)
Oct 21, 2021	88	Notice (Other) (Exhibit 5 - Declaration of Dr. Alfred Ducharme with Ex. C) (30) Docket Text: NOTICE of Filing Defendants Responsive Claim Construction Brief by Robe Lighting Inc, Robe Lighting S.R.O. re [86] Statement, (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1 - Modern dictionary of electronics, # (2) Exhibit 2 - Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary, # (3) Exhibit 3 - U.S. Patent No. 6,612,704, # (4) Exhibit 4 - U.S. Patent No. 6,830,341, # (5) Exhibit 5 - Declaration of Dr. Alfred Ducharme with Ex. C, # (6) Exhibit 6 - U.S. Patent No. 7,014,336, # (7) Exhibit 7 - SPIE, Color Temperature and CCT, # (8) Exhibit 8 - Wikipedia, Color Temperature, # (9) Exhibit 9 - Excerpts of: Transcript from Deposition of Dr. Alfred Ducharme, # (10) Exhibit 10 - Curriculum vitae of Dr. Alfred Ducharme, # (11) Exhibit 12, # (12) Exhibit 13, # (13) Exhibit 14, # (14) Exhibit 15, # (15) Exhibit 16, # (16) Exhibit 17) (Brafman, David)
Oct 21, 2021	88	Notice (Other) (Exhibit 6 - U.S. Patent No. 7,014,336) (30) Docket Text: NOTICE of Filing Defendants Responsive Claim Construction Brief by Robe Lighting Inc, Robe Lighting S.R.O. re [86] Statement, (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1 - Modern dictionary of electronics, # (2) Exhibit 2 - Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary, # (3) Exhibit 3 - U.S. Patent No. 6,612,704, # (4) Exhibit 4 - U.S. Patent No. 6,830,341, # (5) Exhibit 5 - Declaration of Dr. Alfred Ducharme with Ex. C, # (6) Exhibit 6 - U.S. Patent No. 7,014,336, # (7) Exhibit 7 - SPIE, Color Temperature and CCT, # (8) Exhibit 8 - Wikipedia, Color Temperature, # (9) Exhibit 9 - Excerpts of: Transcript from Deposition of Dr. Alfred Ducharme, # (10) Exhibit 10 - Curriculum vitae of Dr. Alfred Ducharme, # (11) Exhibit 12, # (12) Exhibit 13, # (13) Exhibit 14, # (14) Exhibit 15, # (15) Exhibit 16, # (16) Exhibit 17) (Brafman, David)
Oct 21, 2021	88	Notice (Other) (Exhibit 7 - SPIE, Color Temperature and CCT) (3) Docket Text: NOTICE of Filing Defendants Responsive Claim Construction Brief by Robe Lighting Inc, Robe Lighting S.R.O. re [86] Statement, (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1 - Modern dictionary of electronics, # (2) Exhibit 2 - Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary, # (3) Exhibit 3 - U.S. Patent No. 6,612,704, # (4) Exhibit 4 - U.S. Patent No. 6,830,341, # (5) Exhibit 5 - Declaration of Dr. Alfred Ducharme with Ex. C, # (6) Exhibit 6 - U.S. Patent No. 7,014,336, # (7) Exhibit 7 - SPIE, Color Temperature and CCT, # (8) Exhibit 8 - Wikipedia, Color Temperature, # (9) Exhibit 9 - Excerpts of: Transcript from Deposition of Dr. Alfred Ducharme, # (10) Exhibit 10 - Curriculum vitae of Dr. Alfred Ducharme, # (11) Exhibit 12, # (12) Exhibit 13, # (13) Exhibit 14, # (14) Exhibit 15, # (15) Exhibit 16, # (16) Exhibit 17) (Brafman, David)
Oct 21, 2021	88	Notice (Other) (Exhibit 8 - Wikipedia, Color Temperature) (4) Docket Text: NOTICE of Filing Defendants Responsive Claim Construction Brief by Robe Lighting Inc, Robe Lighting S.R.O. re [86] Statement, (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1 - Modern dictionary of electronics, # (2) Exhibit 2 - Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary, # (3) Exhibit 3 - U.S. Patent No. 6,612,704, # (4) Exhibit 4 - U.S. Patent No. 6,830,341, # (5) Exhibit 5 - Declaration of Dr. Alfred Ducharme with Ex. C, # (6) Exhibit 6 - U.S. Patent No. 7,014,336, # (7) Exhibit 7 - SPIE, Color Temperature and CCT, # (8) Exhibit 8 - Wikipedia, Color Temperature, # (9) Exhibit 9 - Excerpts of: Transcript from Deposition of Dr. Alfred Ducharme, # (10) Exhibit 10 - Curriculum vitae of Dr. Alfred Ducharme, # (11) Exhibit 12, # (12) Exhibit 13, # (13) Exhibit 14, # (14) Exhibit 15, # (15) Exhibit 16, # (16) Exhibit 17) (Brafman, David)
Oct 21, 2021	88	Notice (Other) (Exhibit 9 - Excerpts of: Transcript from Deposition of Dr. Alfred Ducharme) (15) Docket Text: NOTICE of Filing Defendants Responsive Claim Construction Brief by Robe Lighting Inc, Robe Lighting S.R.O. re [86] Statement, (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1 - Modern dictionary of electronics, # (2) Exhibit 2 - Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary, # (3) Exhibit 3 - U.S. Patent No. 6,612,704, # (4) Exhibit 4 - U.S. Patent No. 6,830,341, # (5) Exhibit 5 - Declaration of Dr. Alfred Ducharme with Ex. C, # (6) Exhibit 6 - U.S. Patent No. 7,014,336, # (7) Exhibit 7 - SPIE, Color Temperature and CCT, # (8) Exhibit 8 - Wikipedia, Color Temperature, # (9) Exhibit 9 - Excerpts of: Transcript from Deposition of Dr. Alfred Ducharme, # (10) Exhibit 10 - Curriculum vitae of Dr. Alfred Ducharme, # (11) Exhibit 12, # (12) Exhibit 13, # (13) Exhibit 14, # (14) Exhibit 15, # (15) Exhibit 16, # (16) Exhibit 17) (Brafman, David)
Oct 21, 2021	88	Notice (Other) (Exhibit 10 - Curriculum vitae of Dr. Alfred Ducharme) (18) Docket Text: NOTICE of Filing Defendants Responsive Claim Construction Brief by Robe Lighting Inc, Robe Lighting S.R.O. re [86] Statement, (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1 - Modern dictionary of electronics, # (2) Exhibit 2 - Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary, # (3) Exhibit 3 - U.S. Patent No. 6,612,704, # (4) Exhibit 4 - U.S. Patent No. 6,830,341, # (5) Exhibit 5 - Declaration of Dr. Alfred Ducharme with Ex. C, # (6) Exhibit 6 - U.S. Patent No. 7,014,336, # (7) Exhibit 7 - SPIE, Color Temperature and CCT, # (8) Exhibit 8 - Wikipedia, Color Temperature, # (9) Exhibit 9 - Excerpts of: Transcript from Deposition of Dr. Alfred Ducharme, # (10) Exhibit 10 - Curriculum vitae of Dr. Alfred Ducharme, # (11) Exhibit 12, # (12) Exhibit 13, # (13) Exhibit 14, # (14) Exhibit 15, # (15) Exhibit 16, # (16) Exhibit 17) (Brafman, David)
Oct 21, 2021	88	Notice (Other) (Exhibit 12) (2) Docket Text: NOTICE of Filing Defendants Responsive Claim Construction Brief by Robe Lighting Inc, Robe Lighting S.R.O. re [86] Statement, (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1 - Modern dictionary of electronics, # (2) Exhibit 2 - Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary, # (3) Exhibit 3 - U.S. Patent No. 6,612,704, # (4) Exhibit 4 - U.S. Patent No. 6,830,341, # (5) Exhibit 5 - Declaration of Dr. Alfred Ducharme with Ex. C, # (6) Exhibit 6 - U.S. Patent No. 7,014,336, # (7) Exhibit 7 - SPIE, Color Temperature and CCT, # (8) Exhibit 8 - Wikipedia, Color Temperature, # (9) Exhibit 9 - Excerpts of: Transcript from Deposition of Dr. Alfred Ducharme, # (10) Exhibit 10 - Curriculum vitae of Dr. Alfred Ducharme, # (11) Exhibit 12, # (12) Exhibit 13, # (13) Exhibit 14, # (14) Exhibit 15, # (15) Exhibit 16, # (16) Exhibit 17) (Brafman, David)
Oct 21, 2021	88	Notice (Other) (Exhibit 13) (3) Docket Text: NOTICE of Filing Defendants Responsive Claim Construction Brief by Robe Lighting Inc, Robe Lighting S.R.O. re [86] Statement, (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1 - Modern dictionary of electronics, # (2) Exhibit 2 - Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary, # (3) Exhibit 3 - U.S. Patent No. 6,612,704, # (4) Exhibit 4 - U.S. Patent No. 6,830,341, # (5) Exhibit 5 - Declaration of Dr. Alfred Ducharme with Ex. C, # (6) Exhibit 6 - U.S. Patent No. 7,014,336, # (7) Exhibit 7 - SPIE, Color Temperature and CCT, # (8) Exhibit 8 - Wikipedia, Color Temperature, # (9) Exhibit 9 - Excerpts of: Transcript from Deposition of Dr. Alfred Ducharme, # (10) Exhibit 10 - Curriculum vitae of Dr. Alfred Ducharme, # (11) Exhibit 12, # (12) Exhibit 13, # (13) Exhibit 14, # (14) Exhibit 15, # (15) Exhibit 16, # (16) Exhibit 17) (Brafman, David)
Oct 21, 2021	88	Notice (Other) (Exhibit 14) (5) Docket Text: NOTICE of Filing Defendants Responsive Claim Construction Brief by Robe Lighting Inc, Robe Lighting S.R.O. re [86] Statement, (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1 - Modern dictionary of electronics, # (2) Exhibit 2 - Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary, # (3) Exhibit 3 - U.S. Patent No. 6,612,704, # (4) Exhibit 4 - U.S. Patent No. 6,830,341, # (5) Exhibit 5 - Declaration of Dr. Alfred Ducharme with Ex. C, # (6) Exhibit 6 - U.S. Patent No. 7,014,336, # (7) Exhibit 7 - SPIE, Color Temperature and CCT, # (8) Exhibit 8 - Wikipedia, Color Temperature, # (9) Exhibit 9 - Excerpts of: Transcript from Deposition of Dr. Alfred Ducharme, # (10) Exhibit 10 - Curriculum vitae of Dr. Alfred Ducharme, # (11) Exhibit 12, # (12) Exhibit 13, # (13) Exhibit 14, # (14) Exhibit 15, # (15) Exhibit 16, # (16) Exhibit 17) (Brafman, David)
Oct 21, 2021	88	Notice (Other) (Exhibit 15) (2) Docket Text: NOTICE of Filing Defendants Responsive Claim Construction Brief by Robe Lighting Inc, Robe Lighting S.R.O. re [86] Statement, (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1 - Modern dictionary of electronics, # (2) Exhibit 2 - Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary, # (3) Exhibit 3 - U.S. Patent No. 6,612,704, # (4) Exhibit 4 - U.S. Patent No. 6,830,341, # (5) Exhibit 5 - Declaration of Dr. Alfred Ducharme with Ex. C, # (6) Exhibit 6 - U.S. Patent No. 7,014,336, # (7) Exhibit 7 - SPIE, Color Temperature and CCT, # (8) Exhibit 8 - Wikipedia, Color Temperature, # (9) Exhibit 9 - Excerpts of: Transcript from Deposition of Dr. Alfred Ducharme, # (10) Exhibit 10 - Curriculum vitae of Dr. Alfred Ducharme, # (11) Exhibit 12, # (12) Exhibit 13, # (13) Exhibit 14, # (14) Exhibit 15, # (15) Exhibit 16, # (16) Exhibit 17) (Brafman, David)
Oct 21, 2021	88	Notice (Other) (Exhibit 16) (17) Docket Text: NOTICE of Filing Defendants Responsive Claim Construction Brief by Robe Lighting Inc, Robe Lighting S.R.O. re [86] Statement, (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1 - Modern dictionary of electronics, # (2) Exhibit 2 - Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary, # (3) Exhibit 3 - U.S. Patent No. 6,612,704, # (4) Exhibit 4 - U.S. Patent No. 6,830,341, # (5) Exhibit 5 - Declaration of Dr. Alfred Ducharme with Ex. C, # (6) Exhibit 6 - U.S. Patent No. 7,014,336, # (7) Exhibit 7 - SPIE, Color Temperature and CCT, # (8) Exhibit 8 - Wikipedia, Color Temperature, # (9) Exhibit 9 - Excerpts of: Transcript from Deposition of Dr. Alfred Ducharme, # (10) Exhibit 10 - Curriculum vitae of Dr. Alfred Ducharme, # (11) Exhibit 12, # (12) Exhibit 13, # (13) Exhibit 14, # (14) Exhibit 15, # (15) Exhibit 16, # (16) Exhibit 17) (Brafman, David)
Oct 21, 2021	88	Notice (Other) (Exhibit 17) (17) Docket Text: NOTICE of Filing Defendants Responsive Claim Construction Brief by Robe Lighting Inc, Robe Lighting S.R.O. re [86] Statement, (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1 - Modern dictionary of electronics, # (2) Exhibit 2 - Merriam-Webster Online Dictionary, # (3) Exhibit 3 - U.S. Patent No. 6,612,704, # (4) Exhibit 4 - U.S. Patent No. 6,830,341, # (5) Exhibit 5 - Declaration of Dr. Alfred Ducharme with Ex. C, # (6) Exhibit 6 - U.S. Patent No. 7,014,336, # (7) Exhibit 7 - SPIE, Color Temperature and CCT, # (8) Exhibit 8 - Wikipedia, Color Temperature, # (9) Exhibit 9 - Excerpts of: Transcript from Deposition of Dr. Alfred Ducharme, # (10) Exhibit 10 - Curriculum vitae of Dr. Alfred Ducharme, # (11) Exhibit 12, # (12) Exhibit 13, # (13) Exhibit 14, # (14) Exhibit 15, # (15) Exhibit 16, # (16) Exhibit 17) (Brafman, David)
Oct 8, 2021	87	Motion to Compel (Main Document) (7) Docket Text: MOTION to Compel Interrogatory Responses by Robe Lighting Inc, Robe Lighting S.R.O.. Responses due by 10/22/2021 (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1 - Plaintiffs' Responses to Robe's Interrogatories)(Brafman, David)
Oct 8, 2021	87	Motion to Compel (Exhibit 1 - Plaintiffs' Responses to Robe's Interrogatories) (30) Docket Text: MOTION to Compel Interrogatory Responses by Robe Lighting Inc, Robe Lighting S.R.O.. Responses due by 10/22/2021 (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1 - Plaintiffs' Responses to Robe's Interrogatories)(Brafman, David)
Sep 30, 2021	86	Statement (Main Document) (30) Docket Text: Statement of: Signify's Opening Claim Construction Brief by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit Exhibit 1A, # (3) Exhibit Exhibit 1B, # (4) Exhibit Exhibit 2, # (5) Exhibit Exhibit 2A, # (6) Exhibit Exhibit 2B, # (7) Exhibit Exhibit 2C, # (8) Exhibit Exhibit 2D, # (9) Exhibit Exhibit 3, # (10) Exhibit Exhibit 3A, # (11) Exhibit Exhibit 4, # (12) Exhibit Exhibit 4A, # (13) Exhibit Exhibit 5, # (14) Exhibit Exhibit 6, # (15) Exhibit Exhibit 7, # (16) Exhibit Exhibit 8, # (17) Exhibit Exhibit 9, # (18) Exhibit Exhibit 10, # (19) Exhibit Exhibit 11, # (20) Exhibit Exhibit 12, # (21) Exhibit Exhibit 13, # (22) Exhibit Exhibit 14, # (23) Exhibit Exhibit 15, # (24) Exhibit Exhibit 16)(Reiss, Andrew)
Sep 30, 2021	86	Statement (Exhibit Exhibit 1) (10) Docket Text: Statement of: Signify's Opening Claim Construction Brief by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit Exhibit 1A, # (3) Exhibit Exhibit 1B, # (4) Exhibit Exhibit 2, # (5) Exhibit Exhibit 2A, # (6) Exhibit Exhibit 2B, # (7) Exhibit Exhibit 2C, # (8) Exhibit Exhibit 2D, # (9) Exhibit Exhibit 3, # (10) Exhibit Exhibit 3A, # (11) Exhibit Exhibit 4, # (12) Exhibit Exhibit 4A, # (13) Exhibit Exhibit 5, # (14) Exhibit Exhibit 6, # (15) Exhibit Exhibit 7, # (16) Exhibit Exhibit 8, # (17) Exhibit Exhibit 9, # (18) Exhibit Exhibit 10, # (19) Exhibit Exhibit 11, # (20) Exhibit Exhibit 12, # (21) Exhibit Exhibit 13, # (22) Exhibit Exhibit 14, # (23) Exhibit Exhibit 15, # (24) Exhibit Exhibit 16)(Reiss, Andrew)
Sep 30, 2021	86	Statement (Exhibit Exhibit 1A) (4) Docket Text: Statement of: Signify's Opening Claim Construction Brief by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit Exhibit 1A, # (3) Exhibit Exhibit 1B, # (4) Exhibit Exhibit 2, # (5) Exhibit Exhibit 2A, # (6) Exhibit Exhibit 2B, # (7) Exhibit Exhibit 2C, # (8) Exhibit Exhibit 2D, # (9) Exhibit Exhibit 3, # (10) Exhibit Exhibit 3A, # (11) Exhibit Exhibit 4, # (12) Exhibit Exhibit 4A, # (13) Exhibit Exhibit 5, # (14) Exhibit Exhibit 6, # (15) Exhibit Exhibit 7, # (16) Exhibit Exhibit 8, # (17) Exhibit Exhibit 9, # (18) Exhibit Exhibit 10, # (19) Exhibit Exhibit 11, # (20) Exhibit Exhibit 12, # (21) Exhibit Exhibit 13, # (22) Exhibit Exhibit 14, # (23) Exhibit Exhibit 15, # (24) Exhibit Exhibit 16)(Reiss, Andrew)
Sep 30, 2021	86	Statement (Exhibit Exhibit 1B) (2) Docket Text: Statement of: Signify's Opening Claim Construction Brief by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit Exhibit 1A, # (3) Exhibit Exhibit 1B, # (4) Exhibit Exhibit 2, # (5) Exhibit Exhibit 2A, # (6) Exhibit Exhibit 2B, # (7) Exhibit Exhibit 2C, # (8) Exhibit Exhibit 2D, # (9) Exhibit Exhibit 3, # (10) Exhibit Exhibit 3A, # (11) Exhibit Exhibit 4, # (12) Exhibit Exhibit 4A, # (13) Exhibit Exhibit 5, # (14) Exhibit Exhibit 6, # (15) Exhibit Exhibit 7, # (16) Exhibit Exhibit 8, # (17) Exhibit Exhibit 9, # (18) Exhibit Exhibit 10, # (19) Exhibit Exhibit 11, # (20) Exhibit Exhibit 12, # (21) Exhibit Exhibit 13, # (22) Exhibit Exhibit 14, # (23) Exhibit Exhibit 15, # (24) Exhibit Exhibit 16)(Reiss, Andrew)
Sep 30, 2021	86	Statement (Exhibit Exhibit 2) (13) Docket Text: Statement of: Signify's Opening Claim Construction Brief by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit Exhibit 1A, # (3) Exhibit Exhibit 1B, # (4) Exhibit Exhibit 2, # (5) Exhibit Exhibit 2A, # (6) Exhibit Exhibit 2B, # (7) Exhibit Exhibit 2C, # (8) Exhibit Exhibit 2D, # (9) Exhibit Exhibit 3, # (10) Exhibit Exhibit 3A, # (11) Exhibit Exhibit 4, # (12) Exhibit Exhibit 4A, # (13) Exhibit Exhibit 5, # (14) Exhibit Exhibit 6, # (15) Exhibit Exhibit 7, # (16) Exhibit Exhibit 8, # (17) Exhibit Exhibit 9, # (18) Exhibit Exhibit 10, # (19) Exhibit Exhibit 11, # (20) Exhibit Exhibit 12, # (21) Exhibit Exhibit 13, # (22) Exhibit Exhibit 14, # (23) Exhibit Exhibit 15, # (24) Exhibit Exhibit 16)(Reiss, Andrew)
Sep 30, 2021	86	Statement (Exhibit Exhibit 2A) (6) Docket Text: Statement of: Signify's Opening Claim Construction Brief by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit Exhibit 1A, # (3) Exhibit Exhibit 1B, # (4) Exhibit Exhibit 2, # (5) Exhibit Exhibit 2A, # (6) Exhibit Exhibit 2B, # (7) Exhibit Exhibit 2C, # (8) Exhibit Exhibit 2D, # (9) Exhibit Exhibit 3, # (10) Exhibit Exhibit 3A, # (11) Exhibit Exhibit 4, # (12) Exhibit Exhibit 4A, # (13) Exhibit Exhibit 5, # (14) Exhibit Exhibit 6, # (15) Exhibit Exhibit 7, # (16) Exhibit Exhibit 8, # (17) Exhibit Exhibit 9, # (18) Exhibit Exhibit 10, # (19) Exhibit Exhibit 11, # (20) Exhibit Exhibit 12, # (21) Exhibit Exhibit 13, # (22) Exhibit Exhibit 14, # (23) Exhibit Exhibit 15, # (24) Exhibit Exhibit 16)(Reiss, Andrew)
Sep 30, 2021	86	Statement (Exhibit Exhibit 2B) (4) Docket Text: Statement of: Signify's Opening Claim Construction Brief by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit Exhibit 1A, # (3) Exhibit Exhibit 1B, # (4) Exhibit Exhibit 2, # (5) Exhibit Exhibit 2A, # (6) Exhibit Exhibit 2B, # (7) Exhibit Exhibit 2C, # (8) Exhibit Exhibit 2D, # (9) Exhibit Exhibit 3, # (10) Exhibit Exhibit 3A, # (11) Exhibit Exhibit 4, # (12) Exhibit Exhibit 4A, # (13) Exhibit Exhibit 5, # (14) Exhibit Exhibit 6, # (15) Exhibit Exhibit 7, # (16) Exhibit Exhibit 8, # (17) Exhibit Exhibit 9, # (18) Exhibit Exhibit 10, # (19) Exhibit Exhibit 11, # (20) Exhibit Exhibit 12, # (21) Exhibit Exhibit 13, # (22) Exhibit Exhibit 14, # (23) Exhibit Exhibit 15, # (24) Exhibit Exhibit 16)(Reiss, Andrew)
Sep 30, 2021	86	Statement (Exhibit Exhibit 2C) (2) Docket Text: Statement of: Signify's Opening Claim Construction Brief by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit Exhibit 1A, # (3) Exhibit Exhibit 1B, # (4) Exhibit Exhibit 2, # (5) Exhibit Exhibit 2A, # (6) Exhibit Exhibit 2B, # (7) Exhibit Exhibit 2C, # (8) Exhibit Exhibit 2D, # (9) Exhibit Exhibit 3, # (10) Exhibit Exhibit 3A, # (11) Exhibit Exhibit 4, # (12) Exhibit Exhibit 4A, # (13) Exhibit Exhibit 5, # (14) Exhibit Exhibit 6, # (15) Exhibit Exhibit 7, # (16) Exhibit Exhibit 8, # (17) Exhibit Exhibit 9, # (18) Exhibit Exhibit 10, # (19) Exhibit Exhibit 11, # (20) Exhibit Exhibit 12, # (21) Exhibit Exhibit 13, # (22) Exhibit Exhibit 14, # (23) Exhibit Exhibit 15, # (24) Exhibit Exhibit 16)(Reiss, Andrew)
Sep 30, 2021	86	Statement (Exhibit Exhibit 2D) (2) Docket Text: Statement of: Signify's Opening Claim Construction Brief by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit Exhibit 1A, # (3) Exhibit Exhibit 1B, # (4) Exhibit Exhibit 2, # (5) Exhibit Exhibit 2A, # (6) Exhibit Exhibit 2B, # (7) Exhibit Exhibit 2C, # (8) Exhibit Exhibit 2D, # (9) Exhibit Exhibit 3, # (10) Exhibit Exhibit 3A, # (11) Exhibit Exhibit 4, # (12) Exhibit Exhibit 4A, # (13) Exhibit Exhibit 5, # (14) Exhibit Exhibit 6, # (15) Exhibit Exhibit 7, # (16) Exhibit Exhibit 8, # (17) Exhibit Exhibit 9, # (18) Exhibit Exhibit 10, # (19) Exhibit Exhibit 11, # (20) Exhibit Exhibit 12, # (21) Exhibit Exhibit 13, # (22) Exhibit Exhibit 14, # (23) Exhibit Exhibit 15, # (24) Exhibit Exhibit 16)(Reiss, Andrew)
Sep 30, 2021	86	Statement (Exhibit Exhibit 3) (15) Docket Text: Statement of: Signify's Opening Claim Construction Brief by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit Exhibit 1A, # (3) Exhibit Exhibit 1B, # (4) Exhibit Exhibit 2, # (5) Exhibit Exhibit 2A, # (6) Exhibit Exhibit 2B, # (7) Exhibit Exhibit 2C, # (8) Exhibit Exhibit 2D, # (9) Exhibit Exhibit 3, # (10) Exhibit Exhibit 3A, # (11) Exhibit Exhibit 4, # (12) Exhibit Exhibit 4A, # (13) Exhibit Exhibit 5, # (14) Exhibit Exhibit 6, # (15) Exhibit Exhibit 7, # (16) Exhibit Exhibit 8, # (17) Exhibit Exhibit 9, # (18) Exhibit Exhibit 10, # (19) Exhibit Exhibit 11, # (20) Exhibit Exhibit 12, # (21) Exhibit Exhibit 13, # (22) Exhibit Exhibit 14, # (23) Exhibit Exhibit 15, # (24) Exhibit Exhibit 16)(Reiss, Andrew)
Sep 30, 2021	86	Statement (Exhibit Exhibit 3A) (6) Docket Text: Statement of: Signify's Opening Claim Construction Brief by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit Exhibit 1A, # (3) Exhibit Exhibit 1B, # (4) Exhibit Exhibit 2, # (5) Exhibit Exhibit 2A, # (6) Exhibit Exhibit 2B, # (7) Exhibit Exhibit 2C, # (8) Exhibit Exhibit 2D, # (9) Exhibit Exhibit 3, # (10) Exhibit Exhibit 3A, # (11) Exhibit Exhibit 4, # (12) Exhibit Exhibit 4A, # (13) Exhibit Exhibit 5, # (14) Exhibit Exhibit 6, # (15) Exhibit Exhibit 7, # (16) Exhibit Exhibit 8, # (17) Exhibit Exhibit 9, # (18) Exhibit Exhibit 10, # (19) Exhibit Exhibit 11, # (20) Exhibit Exhibit 12, # (21) Exhibit Exhibit 13, # (22) Exhibit Exhibit 14, # (23) Exhibit Exhibit 15, # (24) Exhibit Exhibit 16)(Reiss, Andrew)
Sep 30, 2021	86	Statement (Exhibit Exhibit 4) (30) Docket Text: Statement of: Signify's Opening Claim Construction Brief by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit Exhibit 1A, # (3) Exhibit Exhibit 1B, # (4) Exhibit Exhibit 2, # (5) Exhibit Exhibit 2A, # (6) Exhibit Exhibit 2B, # (7) Exhibit Exhibit 2C, # (8) Exhibit Exhibit 2D, # (9) Exhibit Exhibit 3, # (10) Exhibit Exhibit 3A, # (11) Exhibit Exhibit 4, # (12) Exhibit Exhibit 4A, # (13) Exhibit Exhibit 5, # (14) Exhibit Exhibit 6, # (15) Exhibit Exhibit 7, # (16) Exhibit Exhibit 8, # (17) Exhibit Exhibit 9, # (18) Exhibit Exhibit 10, # (19) Exhibit Exhibit 11, # (20) Exhibit Exhibit 12, # (21) Exhibit Exhibit 13, # (22) Exhibit Exhibit 14, # (23) Exhibit Exhibit 15, # (24) Exhibit Exhibit 16)(Reiss, Andrew)
Sep 30, 2021	86	Statement (Exhibit Exhibit 4A) (15) Docket Text: Statement of: Signify's Opening Claim Construction Brief by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit Exhibit 1A, # (3) Exhibit Exhibit 1B, # (4) Exhibit Exhibit 2, # (5) Exhibit Exhibit 2A, # (6) Exhibit Exhibit 2B, # (7) Exhibit Exhibit 2C, # (8) Exhibit Exhibit 2D, # (9) Exhibit Exhibit 3, # (10) Exhibit Exhibit 3A, # (11) Exhibit Exhibit 4, # (12) Exhibit Exhibit 4A, # (13) Exhibit Exhibit 5, # (14) Exhibit Exhibit 6, # (15) Exhibit Exhibit 7, # (16) Exhibit Exhibit 8, # (17) Exhibit Exhibit 9, # (18) Exhibit Exhibit 10, # (19) Exhibit Exhibit 11, # (20) Exhibit Exhibit 12, # (21) Exhibit Exhibit 13, # (22) Exhibit Exhibit 14, # (23) Exhibit Exhibit 15, # (24) Exhibit Exhibit 16)(Reiss, Andrew)
Sep 30, 2021	86	Statement (Exhibit Exhibit 5) (5) Docket Text: Statement of: Signify's Opening Claim Construction Brief by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit Exhibit 1A, # (3) Exhibit Exhibit 1B, # (4) Exhibit Exhibit 2, # (5) Exhibit Exhibit 2A, # (6) Exhibit Exhibit 2B, # (7) Exhibit Exhibit 2C, # (8) Exhibit Exhibit 2D, # (9) Exhibit Exhibit 3, # (10) Exhibit Exhibit 3A, # (11) Exhibit Exhibit 4, # (12) Exhibit Exhibit 4A, # (13) Exhibit Exhibit 5, # (14) Exhibit Exhibit 6, # (15) Exhibit Exhibit 7, # (16) Exhibit Exhibit 8, # (17) Exhibit Exhibit 9, # (18) Exhibit Exhibit 10, # (19) Exhibit Exhibit 11, # (20) Exhibit Exhibit 12, # (21) Exhibit Exhibit 13, # (22) Exhibit Exhibit 14, # (23) Exhibit Exhibit 15, # (24) Exhibit Exhibit 16)(Reiss, Andrew)
Sep 30, 2021	86	Statement (Exhibit Exhibit 6) (5) Docket Text: Statement of: Signify's Opening Claim Construction Brief by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit Exhibit 1A, # (3) Exhibit Exhibit 1B, # (4) Exhibit Exhibit 2, # (5) Exhibit Exhibit 2A, # (6) Exhibit Exhibit 2B, # (7) Exhibit Exhibit 2C, # (8) Exhibit Exhibit 2D, # (9) Exhibit Exhibit 3, # (10) Exhibit Exhibit 3A, # (11) Exhibit Exhibit 4, # (12) Exhibit Exhibit 4A, # (13) Exhibit Exhibit 5, # (14) Exhibit Exhibit 6, # (15) Exhibit Exhibit 7, # (16) Exhibit Exhibit 8, # (17) Exhibit Exhibit 9, # (18) Exhibit Exhibit 10, # (19) Exhibit Exhibit 11, # (20) Exhibit Exhibit 12, # (21) Exhibit Exhibit 13, # (22) Exhibit Exhibit 14, # (23) Exhibit Exhibit 15, # (24) Exhibit Exhibit 16)(Reiss, Andrew)
Sep 30, 2021	86	Statement (Exhibit Exhibit 7) (6) Docket Text: Statement of: Signify's Opening Claim Construction Brief by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit Exhibit 1A, # (3) Exhibit Exhibit 1B, # (4) Exhibit Exhibit 2, # (5) Exhibit Exhibit 2A, # (6) Exhibit Exhibit 2B, # (7) Exhibit Exhibit 2C, # (8) Exhibit Exhibit 2D, # (9) Exhibit Exhibit 3, # (10) Exhibit Exhibit 3A, # (11) Exhibit Exhibit 4, # (12) Exhibit Exhibit 4A, # (13) Exhibit Exhibit 5, # (14) Exhibit Exhibit 6, # (15) Exhibit Exhibit 7, # (16) Exhibit Exhibit 8, # (17) Exhibit Exhibit 9, # (18) Exhibit Exhibit 10, # (19) Exhibit Exhibit 11, # (20) Exhibit Exhibit 12, # (21) Exhibit Exhibit 13, # (22) Exhibit Exhibit 14, # (23) Exhibit Exhibit 15, # (24) Exhibit Exhibit 16)(Reiss, Andrew)
Sep 30, 2021	86	Statement (Exhibit Exhibit 8) (3) Docket Text: Statement of: Signify's Opening Claim Construction Brief by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit Exhibit 1A, # (3) Exhibit Exhibit 1B, # (4) Exhibit Exhibit 2, # (5) Exhibit Exhibit 2A, # (6) Exhibit Exhibit 2B, # (7) Exhibit Exhibit 2C, # (8) Exhibit Exhibit 2D, # (9) Exhibit Exhibit 3, # (10) Exhibit Exhibit 3A, # (11) Exhibit Exhibit 4, # (12) Exhibit Exhibit 4A, # (13) Exhibit Exhibit 5, # (14) Exhibit Exhibit 6, # (15) Exhibit Exhibit 7, # (16) Exhibit Exhibit 8, # (17) Exhibit Exhibit 9, # (18) Exhibit Exhibit 10, # (19) Exhibit Exhibit 11, # (20) Exhibit Exhibit 12, # (21) Exhibit Exhibit 13, # (22) Exhibit Exhibit 14, # (23) Exhibit Exhibit 15, # (24) Exhibit Exhibit 16)(Reiss, Andrew)
Sep 30, 2021	86	Statement (Exhibit Exhibit 9) (24) Docket Text: Statement of: Signify's Opening Claim Construction Brief by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit Exhibit 1A, # (3) Exhibit Exhibit 1B, # (4) Exhibit Exhibit 2, # (5) Exhibit Exhibit 2A, # (6) Exhibit Exhibit 2B, # (7) Exhibit Exhibit 2C, # (8) Exhibit Exhibit 2D, # (9) Exhibit Exhibit 3, # (10) Exhibit Exhibit 3A, # (11) Exhibit Exhibit 4, # (12) Exhibit Exhibit 4A, # (13) Exhibit Exhibit 5, # (14) Exhibit Exhibit 6, # (15) Exhibit Exhibit 7, # (16) Exhibit Exhibit 8, # (17) Exhibit Exhibit 9, # (18) Exhibit Exhibit 10, # (19) Exhibit Exhibit 11, # (20) Exhibit Exhibit 12, # (21) Exhibit Exhibit 13, # (22) Exhibit Exhibit 14, # (23) Exhibit Exhibit 15, # (24) Exhibit Exhibit 16)(Reiss, Andrew)
Sep 30, 2021	86	Statement (Exhibit Exhibit 10) (9) Docket Text: Statement of: Signify's Opening Claim Construction Brief by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit Exhibit 1A, # (3) Exhibit Exhibit 1B, # (4) Exhibit Exhibit 2, # (5) Exhibit Exhibit 2A, # (6) Exhibit Exhibit 2B, # (7) Exhibit Exhibit 2C, # (8) Exhibit Exhibit 2D, # (9) Exhibit Exhibit 3, # (10) Exhibit Exhibit 3A, # (11) Exhibit Exhibit 4, # (12) Exhibit Exhibit 4A, # (13) Exhibit Exhibit 5, # (14) Exhibit Exhibit 6, # (15) Exhibit Exhibit 7, # (16) Exhibit Exhibit 8, # (17) Exhibit Exhibit 9, # (18) Exhibit Exhibit 10, # (19) Exhibit Exhibit 11, # (20) Exhibit Exhibit 12, # (21) Exhibit Exhibit 13, # (22) Exhibit Exhibit 14, # (23) Exhibit Exhibit 15, # (24) Exhibit Exhibit 16)(Reiss, Andrew)
Sep 30, 2021	86	Statement (Exhibit Exhibit 11) (7) Docket Text: Statement of: Signify's Opening Claim Construction Brief by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit Exhibit 1A, # (3) Exhibit Exhibit 1B, # (4) Exhibit Exhibit 2, # (5) Exhibit Exhibit 2A, # (6) Exhibit Exhibit 2B, # (7) Exhibit Exhibit 2C, # (8) Exhibit Exhibit 2D, # (9) Exhibit Exhibit 3, # (10) Exhibit Exhibit 3A, # (11) Exhibit Exhibit 4, # (12) Exhibit Exhibit 4A, # (13) Exhibit Exhibit 5, # (14) Exhibit Exhibit 6, # (15) Exhibit Exhibit 7, # (16) Exhibit Exhibit 8, # (17) Exhibit Exhibit 9, # (18) Exhibit Exhibit 10, # (19) Exhibit Exhibit 11, # (20) Exhibit Exhibit 12, # (21) Exhibit Exhibit 13, # (22) Exhibit Exhibit 14, # (23) Exhibit Exhibit 15, # (24) Exhibit Exhibit 16)(Reiss, Andrew)
Sep 30, 2021	86	Statement (Exhibit Exhibit 12) (2) Docket Text: Statement of: Signify's Opening Claim Construction Brief by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit Exhibit 1A, # (3) Exhibit Exhibit 1B, # (4) Exhibit Exhibit 2, # (5) Exhibit Exhibit 2A, # (6) Exhibit Exhibit 2B, # (7) Exhibit Exhibit 2C, # (8) Exhibit Exhibit 2D, # (9) Exhibit Exhibit 3, # (10) Exhibit Exhibit 3A, # (11) Exhibit Exhibit 4, # (12) Exhibit Exhibit 4A, # (13) Exhibit Exhibit 5, # (14) Exhibit Exhibit 6, # (15) Exhibit Exhibit 7, # (16) Exhibit Exhibit 8, # (17) Exhibit Exhibit 9, # (18) Exhibit Exhibit 10, # (19) Exhibit Exhibit 11, # (20) Exhibit Exhibit 12, # (21) Exhibit Exhibit 13, # (22) Exhibit Exhibit 14, # (23) Exhibit Exhibit 15, # (24) Exhibit Exhibit 16)(Reiss, Andrew)
Sep 30, 2021	86	Statement (Exhibit Exhibit 13) (18) Docket Text: Statement of: Signify's Opening Claim Construction Brief by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit Exhibit 1A, # (3) Exhibit Exhibit 1B, # (4) Exhibit Exhibit 2, # (5) Exhibit Exhibit 2A, # (6) Exhibit Exhibit 2B, # (7) Exhibit Exhibit 2C, # (8) Exhibit Exhibit 2D, # (9) Exhibit Exhibit 3, # (10) Exhibit Exhibit 3A, # (11) Exhibit Exhibit 4, # (12) Exhibit Exhibit 4A, # (13) Exhibit Exhibit 5, # (14) Exhibit Exhibit 6, # (15) Exhibit Exhibit 7, # (16) Exhibit Exhibit 8, # (17) Exhibit Exhibit 9, # (18) Exhibit Exhibit 10, # (19) Exhibit Exhibit 11, # (20) Exhibit Exhibit 12, # (21) Exhibit Exhibit 13, # (22) Exhibit Exhibit 14, # (23) Exhibit Exhibit 15, # (24) Exhibit Exhibit 16)(Reiss, Andrew)
Sep 30, 2021	86	Statement (Exhibit Exhibit 14) (5) Docket Text: Statement of: Signify's Opening Claim Construction Brief by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit Exhibit 1A, # (3) Exhibit Exhibit 1B, # (4) Exhibit Exhibit 2, # (5) Exhibit Exhibit 2A, # (6) Exhibit Exhibit 2B, # (7) Exhibit Exhibit 2C, # (8) Exhibit Exhibit 2D, # (9) Exhibit Exhibit 3, # (10) Exhibit Exhibit 3A, # (11) Exhibit Exhibit 4, # (12) Exhibit Exhibit 4A, # (13) Exhibit Exhibit 5, # (14) Exhibit Exhibit 6, # (15) Exhibit Exhibit 7, # (16) Exhibit Exhibit 8, # (17) Exhibit Exhibit 9, # (18) Exhibit Exhibit 10, # (19) Exhibit Exhibit 11, # (20) Exhibit Exhibit 12, # (21) Exhibit Exhibit 13, # (22) Exhibit Exhibit 14, # (23) Exhibit Exhibit 15, # (24) Exhibit Exhibit 16)(Reiss, Andrew)
Sep 30, 2021	86	Statement (Exhibit Exhibit 15) (7) Docket Text: Statement of: Signify's Opening Claim Construction Brief by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit Exhibit 1A, # (3) Exhibit Exhibit 1B, # (4) Exhibit Exhibit 2, # (5) Exhibit Exhibit 2A, # (6) Exhibit Exhibit 2B, # (7) Exhibit Exhibit 2C, # (8) Exhibit Exhibit 2D, # (9) Exhibit Exhibit 3, # (10) Exhibit Exhibit 3A, # (11) Exhibit Exhibit 4, # (12) Exhibit Exhibit 4A, # (13) Exhibit Exhibit 5, # (14) Exhibit Exhibit 6, # (15) Exhibit Exhibit 7, # (16) Exhibit Exhibit 8, # (17) Exhibit Exhibit 9, # (18) Exhibit Exhibit 10, # (19) Exhibit Exhibit 11, # (20) Exhibit Exhibit 12, # (21) Exhibit Exhibit 13, # (22) Exhibit Exhibit 14, # (23) Exhibit Exhibit 15, # (24) Exhibit Exhibit 16)(Reiss, Andrew)
Sep 30, 2021	86	Statement (Exhibit Exhibit 16) (6) Docket Text: Statement of: Signify's Opening Claim Construction Brief by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit Exhibit 1A, # (3) Exhibit Exhibit 1B, # (4) Exhibit Exhibit 2, # (5) Exhibit Exhibit 2A, # (6) Exhibit Exhibit 2B, # (7) Exhibit Exhibit 2C, # (8) Exhibit Exhibit 2D, # (9) Exhibit Exhibit 3, # (10) Exhibit Exhibit 3A, # (11) Exhibit Exhibit 4, # (12) Exhibit Exhibit 4A, # (13) Exhibit Exhibit 5, # (14) Exhibit Exhibit 6, # (15) Exhibit Exhibit 7, # (16) Exhibit Exhibit 8, # (17) Exhibit Exhibit 9, # (18) Exhibit Exhibit 10, # (19) Exhibit Exhibit 11, # (20) Exhibit Exhibit 12, # (21) Exhibit Exhibit 13, # (22) Exhibit Exhibit 14, # (23) Exhibit Exhibit 15, # (24) Exhibit Exhibit 16)(Reiss, Andrew)
Sep 29, 2021	N/A	Order on Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages (0) Docket Text: PAPERLESS ORDER. THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon the Parties' Joint Motion to Increase Page Limits for Plaintiffs' Opening and Defendants' Responsive Claim Construction Briefs. [83]. Therein, the Parties request that the Court "allow up to thirty (30) pages for each of Plaintiffs' opening claim construction brief and Defendants' responsive claim construction brief." Id. at 1. The Parties state that the requested increased page limits will greatly assist the Court in resolving the claim construction issues. Id. Accordingly, UPON CONSIDERATION of the Motion, the pertinent portions of the record, and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Parties' Joint Motion to Increase Page Limits for Plaintiffs' Opening and Defendants' Responsive Claim Construction Briefs [83] is GRANTED. The Parties' respective claim construction briefs shall not exceed thirty (30) pages. Signed by Judge K. Michael Moore on 9/29/2021. (tgr)
Sep 28, 2021	83	Motion for Leave to File Excess Pages (3) Docket Text: Joint MOTION for Leave to File Excess Pages for Plaintiffs' Opening and Defendants' Responsive Claim Construction Briefs by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. (Reiss, Andrew)
Sep 28, 2021	84	Notice of Attorney Appearance (2) Docket Text: NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Jose Andre Cortes on behalf of Robe Lighting Inc, Robe Lighting S.R.O.. Attorney Jose Andre Cortes added to party Robe Lighting Inc(pty:dft), Attorney Jose Andre Cortes added to party Robe Lighting S.R.O.(pty:dft). (Cortes, Jose)
Sep 24, 2021	82	Statement (15) Docket Text: Statement of: Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation (Reiss, Andrew)
Sep 23, 2021	N/A	Order on Motion for Extension of Time (0) Docket Text: PAPERLESS ORDER. THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon the Parties' Joint Motion to Adjust Claim Construction Briefing Schedule. [80]. Therein, the Parties argue that they have agreed to file an updated Joint Claim Construction Prehearing Statement reflecting their agreements on claim construction and identifying the claim terms still in dispute, and adjusting the claim construction briefing schedule as requested will allow the Parties sufficient time to brief the remaining disputed claim construction issues. Id. at 1. UPON CONSIDERATION of the Motion, the pertinent portions of the record, and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Parties' Joint Motion to Adjust Claim Construction Briefing Schedule [78] is GRANTED. The claim construction briefing schedule is adjusted as follows: Plaintiffs' opening claim construction brief shall be due on September 30, 2021; Defendants' responsive claim construction brief shall be due on October 21, 2021; and Plaintiffs' reply claim construction brief shall be due on November 4, 2021. Signed by Judge K. Michael Moore on 9/23/2021. (hwr)
Sep 22, 2021	80	Motion for Extension of Time (4) Docket Text: Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to Adjust Claim Construction Briefing Schedule by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. Responses due by 10/6/2021 (Reiss, Andrew)
Aug 26, 2021	N/A	Order on Motion for Extension of Time (0) Docket Text: PAPERLESS ORDER. THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon the Parties' Joint Motion to Extend Deadlines for Claim Construction Discovery and Opening Claim Construction Brief By One Week. [78]. Therein, the Parties seek a one (1) week extension of time to complete claim construction discovery and to file Plaintiffs' opening claim construction brief. See generally id. The Parties argue that their "agreement to adjust the dates above resolves a dispute between the Parties regarding Defendants' intent to rely on an expert declaration in connection with their claim construction briefing and related disclosures." Id. at 1. UPON CONSIDERATION of the Motion, the pertinent portions of the record, and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Parties' Joint Motion to Extend Deadlines for Claim Construction Discovery and Opening Claim Construction Brief By One Week [78] is GRANTED. Plaintiffs' opening claim construction brief shall be due on September 23, 2021. All filing deadlines subsequent thereto are adjusted accordingly. Signed by Judge K. Michael Moore on 8/26/2021. (hwr)
Aug 25, 2021	78	Motion for Extension of Time (3) Docket Text: Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to Extend Deadlines for Claim Construction Discovery and Opening Claim Construction Brief by One Week by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. Responses due by 9/8/2021 (Reiss, Andrew)
Aug 23, 2021	77	Order (4) Docket Text: ORDER ON E-DISCOVERY PROCEDURES. See attached document for full details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lurana S. Snow on 8/23/2021. (sl00)
Aug 19, 2021	76	Order on Motion to Compel (7) Docket Text: ORDER granting in part and denying in part [56] Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel Discovery; granting in part [58] Plaintiffs' Motion for Entry of [Model] E-Discovery Order; denying [67] Plaintiffs' Motion to Strike Defendants' Untimely Objections to Plaintiffs' Interrogatories and Document Requests. See attached document for full details. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lurana S. Snow on 8/19/2021. (sl00)
Aug 2, 2021	75	Statement (18) Docket Text: Statement of: Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation (Reiss, Andrew)
Jul 29, 2021	73	Response/Reply (Other) (Main Document) (0) Docket Text: Plaintiff's REPLY in Support of Motion for Entry of Model E-Discovery Order by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit 2)(Reiss, Andrew)
Jul 29, 2021	73	Response/Reply (Other) (Exhibit 1) (0) Docket Text: Plaintiff's REPLY in Support of Motion for Entry of Model E-Discovery Order by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit 2)(Reiss, Andrew)
Jul 29, 2021	73	Response/Reply (Other) (Exhibit 2) (0) Docket Text: Plaintiff's REPLY in Support of Motion for Entry of Model E-Discovery Order by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit 2)(Reiss, Andrew)
Jul 29, 2021	74	Response/Reply (Other) (5) Docket Text: Plaintiff's REPLY In Support of Motion to Strike Defendants' Untimely Objections to Plaintiffs' Interrogatories and Document Requests by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. (Reiss, Andrew)
Jul 28, 2021	72	Notice (Other) (2) Docket Text: NOTICE by Robe Lighting Inc, Robe Lighting S.R.O. re [71] Order,, Defendants' Notice of Filing re Counterproposal (Brafman, David)
Jul 27, 2021	69	Response in Opposition to Motion (Main Document) (6) Docket Text: RESPONSE in Opposition re [58] Plaintiff's MOTION for Protective Order (Motion for Entry of E-Discovery Order and Incorporated Memorandum of Law) filed by Robe Lighting Inc, Robe Lighting S.R.O.. Replies due by 8/3/2021. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A (Signify Annual 2019 Annual Report, p. 23))(Brafman, David)
Jul 27, 2021	69	Response in Opposition to Motion (Exhibit A (Signify Annual 2019 Annual Report, p. 23)) (3) Docket Text: RESPONSE in Opposition re [58] Plaintiff's MOTION for Protective Order (Motion for Entry of E-Discovery Order and Incorporated Memorandum of Law) filed by Robe Lighting Inc, Robe Lighting S.R.O.. Replies due by 8/3/2021. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A (Signify Annual 2019 Annual Report, p. 23))(Brafman, David)
Jul 27, 2021	70	Response in Opposition to Motion (5) Docket Text: RESPONSE in Opposition re [67] Plaintiff's MOTION to Strike [63] Response in Opposition to Motion,, (Untimely Objections to Plaintiffs' Interrogatories and Document Requests and Incorporated Memorandum of Law filed by Robe Lighting Inc, Robe Lighting S.R.O.. Replies due by 8/3/2021. (Brafman, David)
Jul 27, 2021	N/A	Order (0) Docket Text: PAPERLESS ORDER requiring Defendants to file a Notice of Filing no later than 7/28/2021 by noon, attaching the "counterproposal" it referenced in its Response at ECF No. 69 at 5. "Plaintiffs first broached the subject of an E-Discovery Order during the parties' Rule 26 Conference. In response to Plaintiffs' unduly restrictive proposal, Defendants made a counterproposal, which was rejected by Plaintiffs." Thereafter, Plaintiffs shall address why they rejected the counterproposal and reply to the arguments raised in the Response. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lurana S. Snow on 7/27/2021. (sl00)
Jul 23, 2021	66	Reply to Response to Motion (5) Docket Text: REPLY to Response to Motion re [63] RESPONSE in Opposition re [56] Plaintiff's MOTION to Compel Discovery and Incorporated Memorandum of Law , Revised filed by Robe Lighting Inc, Robe Lighting S.R.O..[56] Plaintiff's MOTION to Compel Discovery and Incorporated Memorandum of Law filed by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. (Reiss, Andrew) Modified document link on 7/26/2021 (ebz).
Jul 23, 2021	67	Motion to Strike (Main Document) (7) Docket Text: Plaintiff's MOTION to Strike [63] Response in Opposition to Motion,, (Untimely Objections to Plaintiffs' Interrogatories and Document Requests and Incorporated Memorandum of Law by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. Responses due by 8/6/2021 (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit 2, # (3) Exhibit 3, # (4) Exhibit 4, # (5) Exhibit 5, # (6) Exhibit 6, # (7) Exhibit 7)(Reiss, Andrew)
Jul 23, 2021	67	Motion to Strike (Exhibit 1) (14) Docket Text: Plaintiff's MOTION to Strike [63] Response in Opposition to Motion,, (Untimely Objections to Plaintiffs' Interrogatories and Document Requests and Incorporated Memorandum of Law by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. Responses due by 8/6/2021 (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit 2, # (3) Exhibit 3, # (4) Exhibit 4, # (5) Exhibit 5, # (6) Exhibit 6, # (7) Exhibit 7)(Reiss, Andrew)
Jul 23, 2021	67	Motion to Strike (Exhibit 2) (19) Docket Text: Plaintiff's MOTION to Strike [63] Response in Opposition to Motion,, (Untimely Objections to Plaintiffs' Interrogatories and Document Requests and Incorporated Memorandum of Law by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. Responses due by 8/6/2021 (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit 2, # (3) Exhibit 3, # (4) Exhibit 4, # (5) Exhibit 5, # (6) Exhibit 6, # (7) Exhibit 7)(Reiss, Andrew)
Jul 23, 2021	67	Motion to Strike (Exhibit 3) (12) Docket Text: Plaintiff's MOTION to Strike [63] Response in Opposition to Motion,, (Untimely Objections to Plaintiffs' Interrogatories and Document Requests and Incorporated Memorandum of Law by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. Responses due by 8/6/2021 (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit 2, # (3) Exhibit 3, # (4) Exhibit 4, # (5) Exhibit 5, # (6) Exhibit 6, # (7) Exhibit 7)(Reiss, Andrew)
Jul 23, 2021	67	Motion to Strike (Exhibit 4) (20) Docket Text: Plaintiff's MOTION to Strike [63] Response in Opposition to Motion,, (Untimely Objections to Plaintiffs' Interrogatories and Document Requests and Incorporated Memorandum of Law by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. Responses due by 8/6/2021 (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit 2, # (3) Exhibit 3, # (4) Exhibit 4, # (5) Exhibit 5, # (6) Exhibit 6, # (7) Exhibit 7)(Reiss, Andrew)
Jul 23, 2021	67	Motion to Strike (Exhibit 5) (14) Docket Text: Plaintiff's MOTION to Strike [63] Response in Opposition to Motion,, (Untimely Objections to Plaintiffs' Interrogatories and Document Requests and Incorporated Memorandum of Law by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. Responses due by 8/6/2021 (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit 2, # (3) Exhibit 3, # (4) Exhibit 4, # (5) Exhibit 5, # (6) Exhibit 6, # (7) Exhibit 7)(Reiss, Andrew)
Jul 23, 2021	67	Motion to Strike (Exhibit 6) (21) Docket Text: Plaintiff's MOTION to Strike [63] Response in Opposition to Motion,, (Untimely Objections to Plaintiffs' Interrogatories and Document Requests and Incorporated Memorandum of Law by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. Responses due by 8/6/2021 (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit 2, # (3) Exhibit 3, # (4) Exhibit 4, # (5) Exhibit 5, # (6) Exhibit 6, # (7) Exhibit 7)(Reiss, Andrew)
Jul 23, 2021	67	Motion to Strike (Exhibit 7) (4) Docket Text: Plaintiff's MOTION to Strike [63] Response in Opposition to Motion,, (Untimely Objections to Plaintiffs' Interrogatories and Document Requests and Incorporated Memorandum of Law by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. Responses due by 8/6/2021 (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit 2, # (3) Exhibit 3, # (4) Exhibit 4, # (5) Exhibit 5, # (6) Exhibit 6, # (7) Exhibit 7)(Reiss, Andrew)
Jul 23, 2021	N/A	Order (0) Docket Text: PAPERLESS ORDER REQUIRING EXPEDITED BRIEFING in light of the multiple pending discovery motions for purposes of judicial economy. The Responses to ECF Nos. 58 and 67 shall be due no later than Tuesday, 7/27/21, at noon; and the Replies shall abe due no later than Thursday, 7/29/21, at noon. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lurana S. Snow on 7/23/2021. (sl00)
Jul 19, 2021	N/A	Order (0) Docket Text: PAPERLESS ORDER striking Non-compliant Response at ECF No. 59 in light of compliant Response filed at ECF No. 63. The Clerk is ordered to strike ECF No. 59. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lurana S. Snow (sl00)
Jul 16, 2021	N/A	Order on Motion to Compel (0) Docket Text: PAPERLESS ORDER denying without prejudice [60] Defendant's Motion to Compel Discovery in that it violates this Court's page limitation of 5 pages and its general conferral certification fails to provide the necessary detail to insure that the Court's conferral requirement of telephonic, in person or Zoom efforts were made. (ECF No. 20) The parties should take this opportunity to discuss all pending discovery motions currently filed with the Court. No less than a half hour shall be set aside to discuss all pending motions no later than July 19, 2021, by 3:00 p.m. If the parties are unable to resolve their disputes, Defendant may re-file a compliant Motion and certification of conferral detailing the efforts made and any agreements or issues resolved. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lurana S. Snow on 7/16/2021. (sl00)
Jul 16, 2021	62	Order on Motion for Protective/Confidentiality Order (18) Docket Text: ORDER GRANTING [57] the Parties Joint Motion for Entry of Stipulated Protective Order Governing Confidentiality. Signed by Magistrate Judge Lurana S. Snow on 7/16/2021. (jz)
Jul 16, 2021	63	Response in Opposition to Motion (Main Document) (6) Docket Text: RESPONSE in Opposition re [56] Plaintiff's MOTION to Compel Discovery and Incorporated Memorandum of Law , Revised filed by Robe Lighting Inc, Robe Lighting S.R.O.. Replies due by 7/23/2021. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1 - Robe's Responses to Interrogatories, # (2) Exhibit 2 - June 2, 2021 Email from Plaintiffs' Counsel to Defendants' Counsel re resolution re interrogatory 7, # (3) Exhibit 3 - Robe's Responses to Requests for Production, # (4) Exhibit 4 - Robe's Amended Responses to Interrogatories, # (5) Exhibit 5 - Robe's Amended Responses to Requests for Production)(Brafman, David)
Jul 16, 2021	63	Response in Opposition to Motion (Exhibit 1 - Robe's Responses to Interrogatories) (14) Docket Text: RESPONSE in Opposition re [56] Plaintiff's MOTION to Compel Discovery and Incorporated Memorandum of Law , Revised filed by Robe Lighting Inc, Robe Lighting S.R.O.. Replies due by 7/23/2021. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1 - Robe's Responses to Interrogatories, # (2) Exhibit 2 - June 2, 2021 Email from Plaintiffs' Counsel to Defendants' Counsel re resolution re interrogatory 7, # (3) Exhibit 3 - Robe's Responses to Requests for Production, # (4) Exhibit 4 - Robe's Amended Responses to Interrogatories, # (5) Exhibit 5 - Robe's Amended Responses to Requests for Production)(Brafman, David)
Jul 16, 2021	63	Response in Opposition to Motion (Exhibit 2 - June 2, 2021 Email from Plaintiffs' Counsel to Defendants') (5) Docket Text: RESPONSE in Opposition re [56] Plaintiff's MOTION to Compel Discovery and Incorporated Memorandum of Law , Revised filed by Robe Lighting Inc, Robe Lighting S.R.O.. Replies due by 7/23/2021. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1 - Robe's Responses to Interrogatories, # (2) Exhibit 2 - June 2, 2021 Email from Plaintiffs' Counsel to Defendants' Counsel re resolution re interrogatory 7, # (3) Exhibit 3 - Robe's Responses to Requests for Production, # (4) Exhibit 4 - Robe's Amended Responses to Interrogatories, # (5) Exhibit 5 - Robe's Amended Responses to Requests for Production)(Brafman, David)
Jul 16, 2021	63	Response in Opposition to Motion (Exhibit 3 - Robe's Responses to Requests for Production) (19) Docket Text: RESPONSE in Opposition re [56] Plaintiff's MOTION to Compel Discovery and Incorporated Memorandum of Law , Revised filed by Robe Lighting Inc, Robe Lighting S.R.O.. Replies due by 7/23/2021. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1 - Robe's Responses to Interrogatories, # (2) Exhibit 2 - June 2, 2021 Email from Plaintiffs' Counsel to Defendants' Counsel re resolution re interrogatory 7, # (3) Exhibit 3 - Robe's Responses to Requests for Production, # (4) Exhibit 4 - Robe's Amended Responses to Interrogatories, # (5) Exhibit 5 - Robe's Amended Responses to Requests for Production)(Brafman, David)
Jul 16, 2021	63	Response in Opposition to Motion (Exhibit 4 - Robe's Amended Responses to Interrogatories) (12) Docket Text: RESPONSE in Opposition re [56] Plaintiff's MOTION to Compel Discovery and Incorporated Memorandum of Law , Revised filed by Robe Lighting Inc, Robe Lighting S.R.O.. Replies due by 7/23/2021. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1 - Robe's Responses to Interrogatories, # (2) Exhibit 2 - June 2, 2021 Email from Plaintiffs' Counsel to Defendants' Counsel re resolution re interrogatory 7, # (3) Exhibit 3 - Robe's Responses to Requests for Production, # (4) Exhibit 4 - Robe's Amended Responses to Interrogatories, # (5) Exhibit 5 - Robe's Amended Responses to Requests for Production)(Brafman, David)
Jul 16, 2021	63	Response in Opposition to Motion (Exhibit 5 - Robe's Amended Responses to Requests for Production) (20) Docket Text: RESPONSE in Opposition re [56] Plaintiff's MOTION to Compel Discovery and Incorporated Memorandum of Law , Revised filed by Robe Lighting Inc, Robe Lighting S.R.O.. Replies due by 7/23/2021. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1 - Robe's Responses to Interrogatories, # (2) Exhibit 2 - June 2, 2021 Email from Plaintiffs' Counsel to Defendants' Counsel re resolution re interrogatory 7, # (3) Exhibit 3 - Robe's Responses to Requests for Production, # (4) Exhibit 4 - Robe's Amended Responses to Interrogatories, # (5) Exhibit 5 - Robe's Amended Responses to Requests for Production)(Brafman, David)
Jul 16, 2021	64	Notice of Withdrawal of Motion (1) Docket Text: NOTICE OF WITHDRAWAL OF MOTION by Robe Lighting Inc, Robe Lighting S.R.O. - Withdrawal Of ECF No. 59, Defendants' Original Memorandum in Opposition to Plaintiffs' Motion to Compel (Brafman, David)
Jul 15, 2021	59	Response in Opposition to Motion (Main Document) (16) Docket Text: STRICKENRESPONSE in Opposition re [56] Plaintiff's MOTION to Compel Discovery and Incorporated Memorandum of Law filed by Robe Lighting Inc, Robe Lighting S.R.O.. Replies due by 7/22/2021. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1 - Robe's Responses to Interrogatories, # (2) Exhibit 2 - June 2, 2021 Email from Plaintiffs' Counsel to Defendants' Counsel re resolution re interrogatory 7, # (3) Exhibit 3 - Robe's Responses to Requests for Production, # (4) Exhibit 4 - Robe's Amended Responses to Interrogatories, # (5) Exhibit 5 - Robe's Amended Responses to Requests for Production)(Brafman, David)Text Modified on 7/19/2021 per DE[65] ORDER (ail).
Jul 15, 2021	59	Response in Opposition to Motion (Exhibit 1 - Robe's Responses to Interrogatories) (14) Docket Text: STRICKENRESPONSE in Opposition re [56] Plaintiff's MOTION to Compel Discovery and Incorporated Memorandum of Law filed by Robe Lighting Inc, Robe Lighting S.R.O.. Replies due by 7/22/2021. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1 - Robe's Responses to Interrogatories, # (2) Exhibit 2 - June 2, 2021 Email from Plaintiffs' Counsel to Defendants' Counsel re resolution re interrogatory 7, # (3) Exhibit 3 - Robe's Responses to Requests for Production, # (4) Exhibit 4 - Robe's Amended Responses to Interrogatories, # (5) Exhibit 5 - Robe's Amended Responses to Requests for Production)(Brafman, David)Text Modified on 7/19/2021 per DE[65] ORDER (ail).
Jul 15, 2021	59	Response in Opposition to Motion (Exhibit 2 - June 2, 2021 Email from Plaintiffs' Counsel to Defendants') (5) Docket Text: STRICKENRESPONSE in Opposition re [56] Plaintiff's MOTION to Compel Discovery and Incorporated Memorandum of Law filed by Robe Lighting Inc, Robe Lighting S.R.O.. Replies due by 7/22/2021. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1 - Robe's Responses to Interrogatories, # (2) Exhibit 2 - June 2, 2021 Email from Plaintiffs' Counsel to Defendants' Counsel re resolution re interrogatory 7, # (3) Exhibit 3 - Robe's Responses to Requests for Production, # (4) Exhibit 4 - Robe's Amended Responses to Interrogatories, # (5) Exhibit 5 - Robe's Amended Responses to Requests for Production)(Brafman, David)Text Modified on 7/19/2021 per DE[65] ORDER (ail).
Jul 15, 2021	59	Response in Opposition to Motion (Exhibit 3 - Robe's Responses to Requests for Production) (19) Docket Text: STRICKENRESPONSE in Opposition re [56] Plaintiff's MOTION to Compel Discovery and Incorporated Memorandum of Law filed by Robe Lighting Inc, Robe Lighting S.R.O.. Replies due by 7/22/2021. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1 - Robe's Responses to Interrogatories, # (2) Exhibit 2 - June 2, 2021 Email from Plaintiffs' Counsel to Defendants' Counsel re resolution re interrogatory 7, # (3) Exhibit 3 - Robe's Responses to Requests for Production, # (4) Exhibit 4 - Robe's Amended Responses to Interrogatories, # (5) Exhibit 5 - Robe's Amended Responses to Requests for Production)(Brafman, David)Text Modified on 7/19/2021 per DE[65] ORDER (ail).
Jul 15, 2021	59	Response in Opposition to Motion (Exhibit 4 - Robe's Amended Responses to Interrogatories) (12) Docket Text: STRICKENRESPONSE in Opposition re [56] Plaintiff's MOTION to Compel Discovery and Incorporated Memorandum of Law filed by Robe Lighting Inc, Robe Lighting S.R.O.. Replies due by 7/22/2021. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1 - Robe's Responses to Interrogatories, # (2) Exhibit 2 - June 2, 2021 Email from Plaintiffs' Counsel to Defendants' Counsel re resolution re interrogatory 7, # (3) Exhibit 3 - Robe's Responses to Requests for Production, # (4) Exhibit 4 - Robe's Amended Responses to Interrogatories, # (5) Exhibit 5 - Robe's Amended Responses to Requests for Production)(Brafman, David)Text Modified on 7/19/2021 per DE[65] ORDER (ail).
Jul 15, 2021	59	Response in Opposition to Motion (Exhibit 5 - Robe's Amended Responses to Requests for Production) (20) Docket Text: STRICKENRESPONSE in Opposition re [56] Plaintiff's MOTION to Compel Discovery and Incorporated Memorandum of Law filed by Robe Lighting Inc, Robe Lighting S.R.O.. Replies due by 7/22/2021. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1 - Robe's Responses to Interrogatories, # (2) Exhibit 2 - June 2, 2021 Email from Plaintiffs' Counsel to Defendants' Counsel re resolution re interrogatory 7, # (3) Exhibit 3 - Robe's Responses to Requests for Production, # (4) Exhibit 4 - Robe's Amended Responses to Interrogatories, # (5) Exhibit 5 - Robe's Amended Responses to Requests for Production)(Brafman, David)Text Modified on 7/19/2021 per DE[65] ORDER (ail).
Jul 15, 2021	60	Motion to Compel (Main Document) (9) Docket Text: MOTION to Compel Discovery by Robe Lighting Inc, Robe Lighting S.R.O.. Responses due by 7/29/2021 (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A - Robe's Requests for Production, # (2) Exhibit B - Signify's Responses to Requests for Production, # (3) Exhibit C - Signify's Supplementa Responses to Requests for Production)(Brafman, David)
Jul 15, 2021	60	Motion to Compel (Exhibit A - Robe's Requests for Production) (13) Docket Text: MOTION to Compel Discovery by Robe Lighting Inc, Robe Lighting S.R.O.. Responses due by 7/29/2021 (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A - Robe's Requests for Production, # (2) Exhibit B - Signify's Responses to Requests for Production, # (3) Exhibit C - Signify's Supplementa Responses to Requests for Production)(Brafman, David)
Jul 15, 2021	60	Motion to Compel (Exhibit B - Signify's Responses to Requests for Production) (30) Docket Text: MOTION to Compel Discovery by Robe Lighting Inc, Robe Lighting S.R.O.. Responses due by 7/29/2021 (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A - Robe's Requests for Production, # (2) Exhibit B - Signify's Responses to Requests for Production, # (3) Exhibit C - Signify's Supplementa Responses to Requests for Production)(Brafman, David)
Jul 15, 2021	60	Motion to Compel (Exhibit C - Signify's Supplementa Responses to Requests for Production) (5) Docket Text: MOTION to Compel Discovery by Robe Lighting Inc, Robe Lighting S.R.O.. Responses due by 7/29/2021 (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit A - Robe's Requests for Production, # (2) Exhibit B - Signify's Responses to Requests for Production, # (3) Exhibit C - Signify's Supplementa Responses to Requests for Production)(Brafman, David)
Jul 14, 2021	57	Motion for Protective/Confidentiality Order (Main Document) (3) Docket Text: Joint MOTION for Protective Order Governing Confidentiality by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit Exhibit A)(Reiss, Andrew)
Jul 14, 2021	57	Motion for Protective/Confidentiality Order (Exhibit Exhibit A) (20) Docket Text: Joint MOTION for Protective Order Governing Confidentiality by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit Exhibit A)(Reiss, Andrew)
Jul 14, 2021	58	Motion for Protective/Confidentiality Order (Main Document) (7) Docket Text: Plaintiff's MOTION for Protective Order (Motion for Entry of E-Discovery Order and Incorporated Memorandum of Law) by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit Exhibit A, # (2) Exhibit Exhibit B, # (3) Exhibit Exhibit C, # (4) Exhibit Exhibit D, # (5) Exhibit Exhibit E, # (6) Exhibit Exhibit F, # (7) Exhibit Exhibit G, # (8) Exhibit Exhibit H)(Reiss, Andrew)
Jul 14, 2021	58	Motion for Protective/Confidentiality Order (Exhibit Exhibit A) (4) Docket Text: Plaintiff's MOTION for Protective Order (Motion for Entry of E-Discovery Order and Incorporated Memorandum of Law) by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit Exhibit A, # (2) Exhibit Exhibit B, # (3) Exhibit Exhibit C, # (4) Exhibit Exhibit D, # (5) Exhibit Exhibit E, # (6) Exhibit Exhibit F, # (7) Exhibit Exhibit G, # (8) Exhibit Exhibit H)(Reiss, Andrew)
Jul 14, 2021	58	Motion for Protective/Confidentiality Order (Exhibit Exhibit B) (4) Docket Text: Plaintiff's MOTION for Protective Order (Motion for Entry of E-Discovery Order and Incorporated Memorandum of Law) by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit Exhibit A, # (2) Exhibit Exhibit B, # (3) Exhibit Exhibit C, # (4) Exhibit Exhibit D, # (5) Exhibit Exhibit E, # (6) Exhibit Exhibit F, # (7) Exhibit Exhibit G, # (8) Exhibit Exhibit H)(Reiss, Andrew)
Jul 14, 2021	58	Motion for Protective/Confidentiality Order (Exhibit Exhibit C) (5) Docket Text: Plaintiff's MOTION for Protective Order (Motion for Entry of E-Discovery Order and Incorporated Memorandum of Law) by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit Exhibit A, # (2) Exhibit Exhibit B, # (3) Exhibit Exhibit C, # (4) Exhibit Exhibit D, # (5) Exhibit Exhibit E, # (6) Exhibit Exhibit F, # (7) Exhibit Exhibit G, # (8) Exhibit Exhibit H)(Reiss, Andrew)
Jul 14, 2021	58	Motion for Protective/Confidentiality Order (Exhibit Exhibit D) (3) Docket Text: Plaintiff's MOTION for Protective Order (Motion for Entry of E-Discovery Order and Incorporated Memorandum of Law) by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit Exhibit A, # (2) Exhibit Exhibit B, # (3) Exhibit Exhibit C, # (4) Exhibit Exhibit D, # (5) Exhibit Exhibit E, # (6) Exhibit Exhibit F, # (7) Exhibit Exhibit G, # (8) Exhibit Exhibit H)(Reiss, Andrew)
Jul 14, 2021	58	Motion for Protective/Confidentiality Order (Exhibit Exhibit E) (4) Docket Text: Plaintiff's MOTION for Protective Order (Motion for Entry of E-Discovery Order and Incorporated Memorandum of Law) by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit Exhibit A, # (2) Exhibit Exhibit B, # (3) Exhibit Exhibit C, # (4) Exhibit Exhibit D, # (5) Exhibit Exhibit E, # (6) Exhibit Exhibit F, # (7) Exhibit Exhibit G, # (8) Exhibit Exhibit H)(Reiss, Andrew)
Jul 14, 2021	58	Motion for Protective/Confidentiality Order (Exhibit Exhibit F) (4) Docket Text: Plaintiff's MOTION for Protective Order (Motion for Entry of E-Discovery Order and Incorporated Memorandum of Law) by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit Exhibit A, # (2) Exhibit Exhibit B, # (3) Exhibit Exhibit C, # (4) Exhibit Exhibit D, # (5) Exhibit Exhibit E, # (6) Exhibit Exhibit F, # (7) Exhibit Exhibit G, # (8) Exhibit Exhibit H)(Reiss, Andrew)
Jul 14, 2021	58	Motion for Protective/Confidentiality Order (Exhibit Exhibit G) (3) Docket Text: Plaintiff's MOTION for Protective Order (Motion for Entry of E-Discovery Order and Incorporated Memorandum of Law) by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit Exhibit A, # (2) Exhibit Exhibit B, # (3) Exhibit Exhibit C, # (4) Exhibit Exhibit D, # (5) Exhibit Exhibit E, # (6) Exhibit Exhibit F, # (7) Exhibit Exhibit G, # (8) Exhibit Exhibit H)(Reiss, Andrew)
Jul 14, 2021	58	Motion for Protective/Confidentiality Order (Exhibit Exhibit H) (30) Docket Text: Plaintiff's MOTION for Protective Order (Motion for Entry of E-Discovery Order and Incorporated Memorandum of Law) by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit Exhibit A, # (2) Exhibit Exhibit B, # (3) Exhibit Exhibit C, # (4) Exhibit Exhibit D, # (5) Exhibit Exhibit E, # (6) Exhibit Exhibit F, # (7) Exhibit Exhibit G, # (8) Exhibit Exhibit H)(Reiss, Andrew)
Jul 1, 2021	N/A	Order on Expedited Motion (0) Docket Text: PAPERLESS ORDER. THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon Defendants' Expedited Motion for an Extension of the Joint Claim Construction Prehearing Statement Deadline. [50]. Therein, Defendants request a thirty (30) day extension of the deadline for the Parties to file the Joint Claim Construction and Prehearing Statement in this matter. Id. at 1. Defendants argue that additional time is necessary because counsel "requires input from Defendants' technical personnel in the Czech Republic and from Defendants' technical expert witness, who has a busy schedule this coming week in connection with a deposition in another litigation." Id. at 2-3. After conferring with Defendants' technical personnel and expert witness, Defendants will then be able to "determine whether the proposed compromised proposals can be adopted and whether any of the disputes are not material to the infringement and validity issues in this case" and "compile the intrinsic and extrinsic evidence relevant to the remaining claim construction disputes." Id. at 3. In response, Plaintiffs argue that Defendants have not shown good cause for an extension. See generally [51]. Specifically, Plaintiffs argue that the requested extension will have a domino effect on remaining deadlines and Defendants' Motion "is the latest attempt by Defendants to delay matters in this case." Id. at 2. Plaintiffs argue that the Parties have made progress towards the preliminary claim constructions and have "only ten disputed terms in four of the Patents-in-Suit" remaining, with apparently "only eight claim construction issues to present to the Court given the overlap of certain of the disputed claims." Id. at 3. In Reply, Defendants argue that the Parties exchanged updated claim construction proposals on June 25, 2021, and "extra time to obtain the analysis by Defendants' expert witness of Plaintiffs' additional proposals on claim construction is [] needed to ensure any necessary discovery requests are formulated and served before their deadline." [54] at 1-2. Defendants argue that the Court's Patent Pretrial Order [11] requires each Party "to identify intrinsic and extrinsic evidence that the party plans to rely upon either to support its own proposed construction or refute the other party's construction," and the "identification of this evidence includes the testimony of percipient and expert witnesses." Id. at 3. Defendants argue that because their technical expert witness is unavailable due to a deposition, they "cannot properly prepare their part of the joint claim construction filing without additional time." Id. Finally, Defendants argue that Plaintiffs will not be harmed or prejudiced by the extensions sought because there are currently no set dates for a Markman Hearing, the completion of fact and expert discovery, or trial. Id. The Court finds that Defendants have set forth good cause to briefly extend the deadline to file the Joint Claim Construction Prehearing Statement. Accordingly, UPON CONSIDERATION of the Motion [50], the pertinent portions of the record, and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Defendants' Expedited Motion for an Extension of the Joint Claim Construction Prehearing Statement Deadline [50] is GRANTED. The Parties' Joint Claim Construction Prehearing Statement shall be due August 2, 2021. Signed by Judge K. Michael Moore on 7/1/2021. (hwr)
Jul 1, 2021	56	Motion to Compel (Main Document) (7) Docket Text: Plaintiff's MOTION to Compel Discovery and Incorporated Memorandum of Law by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. Responses due by 7/15/2021 (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit 2, # (3) Exhibit 3, # (4) Exhibit 4)(Reiss, Andrew)
Jul 1, 2021	56	Motion to Compel (Exhibit 1) (14) Docket Text: Plaintiff's MOTION to Compel Discovery and Incorporated Memorandum of Law by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. Responses due by 7/15/2021 (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit 2, # (3) Exhibit 3, # (4) Exhibit 4)(Reiss, Andrew)
Jul 1, 2021	56	Motion to Compel (Exhibit 2) (19) Docket Text: Plaintiff's MOTION to Compel Discovery and Incorporated Memorandum of Law by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. Responses due by 7/15/2021 (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit 2, # (3) Exhibit 3, # (4) Exhibit 4)(Reiss, Andrew)
Jul 1, 2021	56	Motion to Compel (Exhibit 3) (3) Docket Text: Plaintiff's MOTION to Compel Discovery and Incorporated Memorandum of Law by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. Responses due by 7/15/2021 (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit 2, # (3) Exhibit 3, # (4) Exhibit 4)(Reiss, Andrew)
Jul 1, 2021	56	Motion to Compel (Exhibit 4) (5) Docket Text: Plaintiff's MOTION to Compel Discovery and Incorporated Memorandum of Law by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. Responses due by 7/15/2021 (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit 2, # (3) Exhibit 3, # (4) Exhibit 4)(Reiss, Andrew)
Jun 30, 2021	54	Reply to Response to Motion (4) Docket Text: REPLY to Response to Motion re [50] Defendant's EXPEDITED MOTION Extension of the Joint Claim Construction Prehearing Statement Deadline filed by Robe Lighting Inc, Robe Lighting S.R.O.. (Brafman, David)
Jun 29, 2021	52	Response in Opposition to Motion (5) Docket Text: RESPONSE in Opposition re [50] Defendant's EXPEDITED MOTION Extension of the Joint Claim Construction Prehearing Statement Deadline filed by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. Replies due by 7/6/2021. (Reiss, Andrew)
Jun 29, 2021	53	Mediation Report (3) Docket Text: MEDIATION REPORT by Michael J. Powell. Disposition: Case did not settle.(Reiss, Andrew)
Jun 28, 2021	N/A	Order (0) Docket Text: PAPERLESS ORDER. THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon Defendants' Expedited Motion for an Extension of the Joint Claim Construction Prehearing Statement Deadline. [50]. Therein, Defendants seek a thirty (30) day extension of time, up to and including August 2, 2021, to file the Joint Claim Construction Prehearing Statement. Id. at 4. Defendants aver that Plaintiffs oppose this extension, and Defendants request a ruling on the Motion by July 1, 2021, given that the Joint Claim Construction Prehearing Statement is due July 2, 2021. Id. at 1, 3. The Local Rules of the Southern District of Florida provide that "[t]he Court may, upon written motion and good cause shown, waive the time requirements of [] Local Rule [7.1(c)] and grant an immediate or expedited hearing on any matter requiring such expedited procedure." S.D. Fla. L.R. 7.1(d). UPON CONSIDERATION of the Motion, the pertinent portions of the record and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Parties shall comply with the following expedited briefing schedule: Plaintiffs' response to Defendants' Expedited Motion for an Extension of the Joint Claim Construction Prehearing Statement Deadline [50] shall be due on or before June 29, 2021; Defendants' reply to Plaintiffs' response shall be due on or before June 30, 2021. Signed by Chief Judge K. Michael Moore on 6/28/2021. (hwr)
Jun 25, 2021	50	Expedited Motion (Main Document) (4) Docket Text: Defendant's EXPEDITED MOTION Extension of the Joint Claim Construction Prehearing Statement Deadline by Robe Lighting Inc, Robe Lighting S.R.O.. (Attachments: # (1) Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Brafman, David)
Jun 25, 2021	50	Expedited Motion (Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order) (1) Docket Text: Defendant's EXPEDITED MOTION Extension of the Joint Claim Construction Prehearing Statement Deadline by Robe Lighting Inc, Robe Lighting S.R.O.. (Attachments: # (1) Text of Proposed Order Proposed Order)(Brafman, David)
May 20, 2021	49	Notice of Entry of Parties Listed into CM/ECF (2) Docket Text: Notice of Entry of Parties Listed on [48] Clerks Notice of Docket Correction and Instruction to Filer - Attorney, [47] Notice of Mediator Selection and/or Hearing into CM/ECF. NOTE: New Filer(s) will appear twice, since they are also a new party in the case. New Filer(s)/Party(s): Michael J. Powell. (Reiss, Andrew)
May 18, 2021	47	Notice of Mediator Selection and/or Hearing (2) Docket Text: NOTICE of Mediator Selection. Michael J. Powell, Esq. Selected/Added Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation as Mediator. (Reiss, Andrew)
May 18, 2021	N/A	Clerk's Notice of Docket Correction and Instruction to Filer - Attorney (0) Docket Text: Clerks Notice to Filer re [47] Notice of Mediator Selection and/or Hearing. Parties/Mediator Not Added; ERROR - The Filer failed to add all parties from the complaint/petition/removal, etc. or the mediator. Filer is instructed to file a Notice of Entry of Parties Listed into CM/ECF and add the additional parties/mediator. (ebz)
May 17, 2021	45	Notice of Compliance (2) Docket Text: NOTICE of Compliance Regarding Service of Proposed Claim Terms for Construction by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation re [11] Pretrial Order (Reiss, Andrew)
May 17, 2021	46	Notice of Compliance (1) Docket Text: NOTICE of Compliance Regarding Service of List of Claim Terms Requiring Construction by Robe Lighting Inc, Robe Lighting S.R.O. re [11] Pretrial Order (Brafman, David)
May 3, 2021	N/A	Order Referring Case to Mediation (0) Docket Text: PAPERLESS ORDER. THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon a sua sponte examination of the record. On April 30, 2021, the Parties filed a Joint Conference Report which states "[t]he Parties believe that early mediation would be appropriate for this matter and request that [the] Court enter an order referring this case to mediation in accordance with Local Rule 16... [and] respectfully request that the Court allow mediation via videoconference given the current travel limitations and restrictions due to COVID-19." [41] at 5-6. Pursuant to Rule 16 of the Federal Rule of Civil Procedure and Rule 16.2 of the Local Rules of the United States District Court for the Southern District of Florida, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED as follows: 1. All parties are required to participate in mediation. The mediation shall be completed within one hundred and twenty (120) days, unless the Court grants an extension for good cause shown. 2. Plaintiffs' counsel, or another attorney agreed upon by all counsel of record and any unrepresented parties, shall be responsible for scheduling the mediation conference. The parties are encouraged to avail themselves of the services of any mediator on the List of Certified Mediators, maintained in the office of the Clerk of this Court, but may select any other mediator. The parties shall agree upon a mediator and file a Notice of Mediator Selection within fifteen (15) days from the date of this Order. If there is no agreement, lead counsel shall file a request for the Clerk of Court to appoint a mediator in writing within fifteen (15) days from the date of this Order, and the Clerk shall designate a mediator from the List of Certified Mediators. Designation shall be made on a blind rotation basis. 3. The parties shall agree upon a place, date, and time for mediation convenient to the mediator, counsel of record, and unrepresented parties and file a Notice of Scheduling Mediation no later than thirty (30) days from the date of this Order. If the parties cannot agree to a place, date, and time for the mediation, they may motion the Court for an order dictating the place, date, and time. 4. The presence of counsel and each party or representatives of each party with full authority to enter in a full and complete compromise and settlement, either in person or via videoconference, is mandatory. If insurance is involved, an adjuster with authority up to the policy limits or the most recent demand, whichever is lower, shall attend. 5. All discussions, representations and statements made at the mediation conference shall be confidential and privileged. 6. At least ten (10) days prior to the mediation date, all parties shall present to the mediator a brief written summary of the case identifying issues to be resolved. Copies of those summaries shall be served on all other parties. 7. The Court may impose sanctions against parties and/or counsel who do not comply with the attendance or settlement authority requirements herein, or who otherwise violate the terms of this Order. The mediator shall report non-attendance and may recommend imposition of sanctions by the Court for non-attendance. 8. The mediator shall be compensated in accordance with the standing order of the Court entered pursuant to Rule 16.2.B.6, or on such basis as may be agreed to in writing by the parties and the mediator selected by the parties. The cost of mediation shall be shared equally by the parties unless otherwise ordered by the Court. All payments shall be remitted to the mediator within 30 days of the date of the bill. Notice to the mediator of cancellation or settlement prior to the scheduled mediation conference must be given at least two (2) full business days in advance. Failure to do so will result in imposition of a fee for one hour. 9. If a full or partial settlement is reached in this case, counsel shall promptly notify the Court of the settlement in accordance with Local Rule 16.2.F, by filing a notice of settlement signed by the counsel of record within ten (10) days of the mediation conference. Thereafter, the parties shall forthwith submit an appropriate pleading concluding the case. 10. Within five (5I) days following the mediation conference, the mediator shall file a Mediation Report indicating whether all required parties were present. The report shall also indicate whether the case settled (in full or in part), was continued with the consent of the parties, or whether the mediator declared an impasse. Signed by Chief Judge K. Michael Moore on 5/3/2021. (hwr)
May 3, 2021	43	Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement (1) Docket Text: Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement - NONE disclosed by Robe Lighting S.R.O. (Brafman, David)
May 3, 2021	44	Notice of Compliance (1) Docket Text: NOTICE of Compliance with Patent Pretrial Order by Robe Lighting Inc, Robe Lighting S.R.O. re [11] Pretrial Order (Brafman, David)
Apr 30, 2021	41	SCHEDULING REPORT - Rule 26(f)/16.1 (Main Document) (11) Docket Text: Agreed SCHEDULING REPORT - Rule 26(f) by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit)(Reiss, Andrew)
Apr 30, 2021	41	SCHEDULING REPORT - Rule 26(f)/16.1 (Exhibit) (4) Docket Text: Agreed SCHEDULING REPORT - Rule 26(f) by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit)(Reiss, Andrew)
Mar 25, 2021	39	Affidavit (1) Docket Text: AFFIDAVIT of Service of ROBE Lighting S.R.O. signed by: Mgr. Hana Kohoutkoya, Judge by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation (Reiss, Andrew)
Mar 25, 2021	40	Answer to Complaint (16) Docket Text: Defendant Robe Lighting s.r.o.'s ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Complaint with Jury Demand by Robe Lighting S.R.O.. Attorney David S Brafman added to party Robe Lighting S.R.O.(pty:dft). (Brafman, David)
Mar 19, 2021	38	Notice of Compliance (2) Docket Text: NOTICE of Compliance Regarding Service of Asserted Claims and Infringement Contentions on Defendant Robe Lighting S.R.O. by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation (Reiss, Andrew)
Mar 16, 2021	37	Order on Motion to Dismiss (6) Docket Text: ORDER DENYING [30] Motion to Dismiss Plaintiffs' Demand for Injunctive Relief. Signed by Chief Judge K. Michael Moore on 3/15/2021. See attached document for full details. (hwr)
Jan 11, 2021	36	Reply to Response to Motion (9) Docket Text: REPLY to Response to Motion re [30] Defendant's MOTION to Dismiss [24] Amended Complaint/Amended Notice of Removal, Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Demand for Injunctive Relief filed by Robe Lighting Inc. (Brafman, David)
Jan 4, 2021	34	Response in Opposition to Motion (15) Docket Text: RESPONSE in Opposition re [30] Defendant's MOTION to Dismiss [24] Amended Complaint/Amended Notice of Removal, Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Demand for Injunctive Relief filed by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. Replies due by 1/11/2021. (Reiss, Andrew)
Jan 4, 2021	35	Order on Motion for Miscellaneous Relief (6) Docket Text: ORDER DENYING WITHOUT PREJUDICE [25] Plaintiffs' Expedited Motion for Substituted Service. Signed by Chief Judge K. Michael Moore on 1/4/2021. See attached document for full details. (hwr)
Dec 23, 2020	33	Response in Support of Motion (6) Docket Text: RESPONSE in Support re [25] MOTION For Substituted Service on Defendant Robe Lighting S.R.O. Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(f)(3) (EXPEDITED MOTION) filed by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. (Reiss, Andrew)
Dec 18, 2020	30	Motion to Dismiss (Main Document) (6) Docket Text: Defendant's MOTION to Dismiss [24] Amended Complaint/Amended Notice of Removal, Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Demand for Injunctive Relief by Robe Lighting Inc. Responses due by 1/4/2021 (Attachments: # (1) Text of Proposed Order on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Demand for Injunctive Relief)(Brafman, David)
Dec 18, 2020	30	Motion to Dismiss (Text of Proposed Order on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's De) (1) Docket Text: Defendant's MOTION to Dismiss [24] Amended Complaint/Amended Notice of Removal, Defendant's Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Demand for Injunctive Relief by Robe Lighting Inc. Responses due by 1/4/2021 (Attachments: # (1) Text of Proposed Order on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss Plaintiff's Demand for Injunctive Relief)(Brafman, David)
Dec 18, 2020	31	Response in Opposition to Motion (7) Docket Text: RESPONSE in Opposition re [25] MOTION For Substituted Service on Defendant Robe Lighting S.R.O. Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(f)(3) (EXPEDITED MOTION) filed by Robe Lighting Inc. Replies due by 12/28/2020. (Brafman, David)
Dec 18, 2020	32	Answer to Complaint (16) Docket Text: ANSWER and Affirmative Defenses to Complaint with Jury Demand For The Amended Complaint by Robe Lighting Inc. (Brafman, David)
Dec 10, 2020	29	Notice of Attorney Appearance (1) Docket Text: NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Mark David Passler on behalf of Robe Lighting Inc. Attorney Mark David Passler added to party Robe Lighting Inc(pty:dft). (Passler, Mark)
Dec 7, 2020	N/A	Order on Motion for Extension of Time (0) Docket Text: PAPERLESS ORDER. THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon Plaintiffs' Conditional Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Asserted Claims and Infringement Contentions. [19]. Therein, Plaintiffs state that they served Defendants' counsel with their Disclosure of Asserted Claims and Infringement Contentions based on reasonable belief of receiving "confirmation by Robe's US counsel that he was accepting service of the infringement contentions on behalf of both Robe Lighting Inc. and Robe Lighting s.r.o." Id. at 3. Plaintiffs state that Defendants' counsel confirmed receipt of the infringement contentions, but later in the day clarified their confirmation, stating that because "Robe Lighting s.r.o. has not yet been served with the complaint, is a foreign company, and has not otherwise appeared in the litigation, we are not currently accepting service of anything (including the infringement contentions) on behalf of Robe Lighting s.r.o." Id. at 4. On December 4, 2020, counsel for Defendant Robe Lighting Inc. filed its Memorandum in Response to Plaintiffs' Notice of Compliance and Conditional Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Asserted Claims and Infringement Contentions ("Response"). [26]. In its Response, Defendant Robe Lighting Inc. disputes the effectiveness of service of the asserted claims and infringement contentions as to Robe Lighting s.r.o., stating "Defendant Robe Lighting s.r.o. is not yet subject to service of Plaintiffs' Contentions (or discovery requests or the like) because it is not an active party or subject to the Court's jurisdiction until it has been served with the Complaint and Summons." Id. at 3. Thus, only one of the two named Defendants has been effectively served with Plaintiffs' asserted claims and infringement contentions. Plaintiffs request "an extension to serve its Disclosure of Asserted Claims and Infringement Contentions on Robe Lighting s.r.o. until such time that the Complaint and Summons are deemed served on Robe Lighting s.r.o." [19]. "District courts have 'unquestionable' authority to control their own dockets." Smith v. Psychiatric Sol., Inc., 750 F.3d 1253, 1262 (11th Cir. 2014) (citation omitted). "This authority includes 'broad discretion in deciding how best to manage the cases before them.'" Id. (citation omitted). Plaintiffs argue that since "Defendants' invalidity contentions are due within 45 days of service of the infringement contentions in accordance with the Patent Pretrial Order [[11]], it would be highly inefficient and a waste of the Court's and the parties' resources to proceed down two separate schedules for invalidity contentions and claim construction, one schedule triggered off of [Plaintiffs'] November 25, 2020 service of the infringement contentions on Robe Lighting Inc., and a second schedule triggered off of service on Robe Lighting s.r.o. under the Hague Convention." [19] at 5. Plaintiffs further argue that "proceeding down two separate schedules for invalidity contentions and claim construction would give [Defendants] two bites at the apple, which would be manifestly unfair given the corporate relationship between Robe Lighting Inc. and Robe Lighting s.r.o." Id. Counsel for Defendant Robe Lighting Inc. does not address the requested extension in its Response. See generally [26]. Accordingly, UPON CONSIDERATION of the Motion [19], pertinent portions of the record, and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Plaintiffs' Conditional Motion for Extension of Time to Serve Asserted Claims and Infringement Contentions is GRANTED. Plaintiffs shall serve their Disclosure of Asserted Claims and Infringement Contentions on Robe Lighting s.r.o. within seven (7) days of serving the Complaint and Summons on Robe Lighting s.r.o. Defendant Robe Lighting Inc.'s and Defendant Robe Lighting s.r.o.'s invalidity contentions shall be due forty-five (45) days thereafter. Signed by Chief Judge K. Michael Moore on 12/7/2020. (hwr)
Dec 7, 2020	N/A	Order on Motion to Dismiss (0) Docket Text: PAPERLESS ORDER. THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon Plaintiffs' filing of an Amended Complaint for Patent Infringement. [24]. The Amended Complaint moots Defendant's Motion to Dismiss. [21]. Accordingly, UPON CONSIDERATION of the Amended Complaint [24], the pertinent portions of the record, and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, it is ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that Defendant's Motion to Dismiss [24] is DENIED AS MOOT. Signed by Chief Judge K. Michael Moore on 12/7/2020. (hwr)
Dec 4, 2020	24	Amended Complaint/Amended Notice of Removal (Main Document) (30) Docket Text: AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT against All Plaintiffs, filed by Signify North America Corporation, Signify Holding B.V.. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit Exhibit 2, # (3) Exhibit Exhibit 3, # (4) Exhibit Exhibit 4, # (5) Exhibit Exhibit 5)(Reiss, Andrew)
Dec 4, 2020	24	Amended Complaint/Amended Notice of Removal (Exhibit Exhibit 1) (4) Docket Text: AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT against All Plaintiffs, filed by Signify North America Corporation, Signify Holding B.V.. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit Exhibit 2, # (3) Exhibit Exhibit 3, # (4) Exhibit Exhibit 4, # (5) Exhibit Exhibit 5)(Reiss, Andrew)
Dec 4, 2020	24	Amended Complaint/Amended Notice of Removal (Exhibit Exhibit 2) (2) Docket Text: AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT against All Plaintiffs, filed by Signify North America Corporation, Signify Holding B.V.. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit Exhibit 2, # (3) Exhibit Exhibit 3, # (4) Exhibit Exhibit 4, # (5) Exhibit Exhibit 5)(Reiss, Andrew)
Dec 4, 2020	24	Amended Complaint/Amended Notice of Removal (Exhibit Exhibit 3) (2) Docket Text: AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT against All Plaintiffs, filed by Signify North America Corporation, Signify Holding B.V.. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit Exhibit 2, # (3) Exhibit Exhibit 3, # (4) Exhibit Exhibit 4, # (5) Exhibit Exhibit 5)(Reiss, Andrew)
Dec 4, 2020	24	Amended Complaint/Amended Notice of Removal (Exhibit Exhibit 4) (2) Docket Text: AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT against All Plaintiffs, filed by Signify North America Corporation, Signify Holding B.V.. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit Exhibit 2, # (3) Exhibit Exhibit 3, # (4) Exhibit Exhibit 4, # (5) Exhibit Exhibit 5)(Reiss, Andrew)
Dec 4, 2020	24	Amended Complaint/Amended Notice of Removal (Exhibit Exhibit 5) (2) Docket Text: AMENDED COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT against All Plaintiffs, filed by Signify North America Corporation, Signify Holding B.V.. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit Exhibit 2, # (3) Exhibit Exhibit 3, # (4) Exhibit Exhibit 4, # (5) Exhibit Exhibit 5)(Reiss, Andrew)
Dec 4, 2020	25	Motion for Miscellaneous Relief (Main Document) (15) Docket Text: MOTION For Substituted Service on Defendant Robe Lighting S.R.O. Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(f)(3) (EXPEDITED MOTION) by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit Exhibit 2)(Reiss, Andrew)
Dec 4, 2020	25	Motion for Miscellaneous Relief (Exhibit Exhibit 1) (5) Docket Text: MOTION For Substituted Service on Defendant Robe Lighting S.R.O. Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(f)(3) (EXPEDITED MOTION) by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit Exhibit 2)(Reiss, Andrew)
Dec 4, 2020	25	Motion for Miscellaneous Relief (Exhibit Exhibit 2) (5) Docket Text: MOTION For Substituted Service on Defendant Robe Lighting S.R.O. Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 4(f)(3) (EXPEDITED MOTION) by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit Exhibit 1, # (2) Exhibit Exhibit 2)(Reiss, Andrew)
Dec 4, 2020	26	Response/Reply (Other) (4) Docket Text: RESPONSE to [18] Notice of Compliance, [19] MOTION for Extension of Time to Serve Asserted Claims and Infringement Contentions by Robe Lighting Inc. (Brafman, David)
Dec 3, 2020	22	Notice of Attorney Appearance (2) Docket Text: NOTICE of Attorney Appearance by Martha Anne Leibell on behalf of Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. Attorney Martha Anne Leibell added to party Signify Holding B.V.(pty:pla), Attorney Martha Anne Leibell added to party Signify North America Corporation(pty:pla). (Leibell, Martha)
Dec 3, 2020	23	Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement (1) Docket Text: Corporate Disclosure Statement by Robe Lighting Inc identifying Corporate Parent Robe Lighting s.r.o. for Robe Lighting Inc (Brafman, David)
Dec 2, 2020	21	Motion to Dismiss (4) Docket Text: MOTION to Dismiss [1] Complaint, by Robe Lighting Inc. Attorney David S Brafman added to party Robe Lighting Inc(pty:dft). Responses due by 12/16/2020 (Brafman, David)
Nov 29, 2020	20	Order (4) Docket Text: VACATING GENERAL ORDER ON DISCOVERY OBJECTIONS AND PROCEDURES signed by Magistrate Judge Lurana S. Snow on 11/29/2020. (jz) Modified per DE [114] Order on 6/10/2022 (ebz).
Nov 27, 2020	18	Notice of Compliance (3) Docket Text: NOTICE of Compliance Regarding Service of Claims and Contentions by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation re [11] Pretrial Order (Reiss, Andrew)
Nov 27, 2020	19	Motion for Extension of Time (Main Document) (7) Docket Text: MOTION for Extension of Time to Serve Asserted Claims and Infringement Contentions by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. Responses due by 12/11/2020 (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit E-mail communication, # (2) Exhibit E-mail communication)(Reiss, Andrew)
Nov 27, 2020	19	Motion for Extension of Time (Exhibit E-mail communication) (5) Docket Text: MOTION for Extension of Time to Serve Asserted Claims and Infringement Contentions by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. Responses due by 12/11/2020 (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit E-mail communication, # (2) Exhibit E-mail communication)(Reiss, Andrew)
Nov 27, 2020	19	Motion for Extension of Time (Exhibit E-mail communication) (5) Docket Text: MOTION for Extension of Time to Serve Asserted Claims and Infringement Contentions by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. Responses due by 12/11/2020 (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit E-mail communication, # (2) Exhibit E-mail communication)(Reiss, Andrew)
Nov 16, 2020	17	Summons Returned Executed (2) Docket Text: SUMMONS (Affidavit) Returned Executed on [1] Complaint, with a 21 day response/answer filing deadline pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12 by Signify North America Corporation, Signify Holding B.V.. Robe Lighting Inc served on 11/12/2020, answer due 12/3/2020. (Reiss, Andrew)
Nov 13, 2020	6	Certificate of Other Affiliates/Corporate Disclosure Statement (1) Docket Text: Corporate Disclosure Statement by Signify North America Corporation identifying Corporate Parent Signify Holding B.V. for Signify North America Corporation (Reiss, Andrew)
Nov 13, 2020	7	Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice (5) Docket Text: MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing for Jessica L. Copeland. Filing Fee $ 200.00 Receipt # AFLSDC-13860984 by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. Responses due by 11/30/2020 (Reiss, Andrew)
Nov 13, 2020	8	Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice (5) Docket Text: MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing for Jonathan L. Gray. Filing Fee $ 200.00 Receipt # AFLSDC-13861030 by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. Responses due by 11/30/2020 (Reiss, Andrew)
Nov 13, 2020	9	Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice (5) Docket Text: MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing for George R. McGuire. Filing Fee $ 200.00 Receipt # AFLSDC-13861144 by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. Responses due by 11/30/2020 (Reiss, Andrew)
Nov 13, 2020	10	Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice (5) Docket Text: MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing for Jeremy P. Oczek. Filing Fee $ 200.00 Receipt # AFLSDC-13861162 by Signify Holding B.V., Signify North America Corporation. Responses due by 11/30/2020 (Reiss, Andrew)
Nov 13, 2020	11	Pretrial Order (11) Docket Text: PRETRIAL ORDER Signed by Chief Judge K. Michael Moore on 11/13/2020. See attached document for full details. (hwr)
Nov 13, 2020	N/A	Order Referring Case to Magistrate Judge (0) Docket Text: PAPERLESS ORDER REFERRING PRETRIAL DISCOVERY MATTERS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE LURANA S. SNOW. PURSUANT to 28 U.S.C. � 636 and the Magistrate Rules of the Local Rules of the Southern District of Florida, the above-captioned Cause is referred to United States Magistrate Judge Lurana S. Snow to take all necessary and proper action as required by law with respect to any and all pretrial discovery matters. Any motion affecting deadlines set by the Court's Scheduling Order is excluded from this referral, unless specifically referred by separate Order. It is FURTHER ORDERED that the parties shall comply with Magistrate Judge Lurana S. Snow's discovery procedures, which the parties shall be advised of by the entry of an Order. Signed by Chief Judge K. Michael Moore on 11/13/2020. (hwr)
Nov 13, 2020	N/A	Order on Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice (0) Docket Text: PAPERLESS ORDER. THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon Plaintiffs' Motion for Jessica L. Copeland to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. [7]. UPON CONSIDERATION of the Motion, the pertinent portions of the record, and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Motion [7] is GRANTED. Jessica L. Copeland may appear pro hac vice in this matter. The Clerk of the Court shall provide electronic notification of all electronic filings to jcopeland@bsk.com. Signed by Chief Judge K. Michael Moore on 11/13/2020. (hwr)
Nov 13, 2020	N/A	Order on Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice (0) Docket Text: PAPERLESS ORDER. THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon Plaintiffs' Motion for Jonathan L. Gray to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. [8]. UPON CONSIDERATION of the Motion, the pertinent portions of the record, and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Motion [8] is GRANTED. Jonathan L. Gray may appear pro hac vice in this matter. The Clerk of the Court shall provide electronic notification of all electronic filings to jlgray@bsk.com. Signed by Chief Judge K. Michael Moore on 11/13/2020. (hwr)
Nov 13, 2020	N/A	Order on Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice (0) Docket Text: PAPERLESS ORDER. THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon Plaintiffs' Motion for George R. McGuire to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. [9]. UPON CONSIDERATION of the Motion, the pertinent portions of the record, and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Motion [9] is GRANTED. George R. McGuire may appear pro hac vice in this matter. The Clerk of the Court shall provide electronic notification of all electronic filings to gmcguire@bsk.com. Signed by Chief Judge K. Michael Moore on 11/13/2020. (hwr)
Nov 13, 2020	N/A	Order on Motion to Appear Pro Hac Vice (0) Docket Text: PAPERLESS ORDER. THIS CAUSE came before the Court upon Plaintiffs' Motion for Jeremy P. Oczek to Appear Pro Hac Vice, Consent to Designation, and Request to Electronically Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. [10]. UPON CONSIDERATION of the Motion, the pertinent portions of the record, and being otherwise fully advised in the premises, it is hereby ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that the Motion [10] is GRANTED. Jeremy P. Oczek may appear pro hac vice in this matter. The Clerk of the Court shall provide electronic notification of all electronic filings to jpoczek@bsk.com. Signed by Chief Judge K. Michael Moore on 11/13/2020. (hwr)
Nov 12, 2020	1	Complaint (Main Document) (30) Docket Text: COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement against All Defendants. Filing fees $ 400.00. Pay.gov Agency Tracking ID FLSDC-13854740, payment transferred from : 20cv24640, filed by Signify North America Corporation and Signify Holding B.V.. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit Exhibit, # (2) Exhibit Exhibit, # (3) Exhibit Exhibit, # (4) Exhibit Exhibit, # (5) Exhibit Exhibit, # (6) Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, # (7) Summon(s) Summons, # (8) Summon(s) Summons)(Reiss, Andrew)
Nov 12, 2020	1	Complaint (Exhibit Exhibit) (4) Docket Text: COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement against All Defendants. Filing fees $ 400.00. Pay.gov Agency Tracking ID FLSDC-13854740, payment transferred from : 20cv24640, filed by Signify North America Corporation and Signify Holding B.V.. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit Exhibit, # (2) Exhibit Exhibit, # (3) Exhibit Exhibit, # (4) Exhibit Exhibit, # (5) Exhibit Exhibit, # (6) Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, # (7) Summon(s) Summons, # (8) Summon(s) Summons)(Reiss, Andrew)
Nov 12, 2020	1	Complaint (Exhibit Exhibit) (2) Docket Text: COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement against All Defendants. Filing fees $ 400.00. Pay.gov Agency Tracking ID FLSDC-13854740, payment transferred from : 20cv24640, filed by Signify North America Corporation and Signify Holding B.V.. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit Exhibit, # (2) Exhibit Exhibit, # (3) Exhibit Exhibit, # (4) Exhibit Exhibit, # (5) Exhibit Exhibit, # (6) Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, # (7) Summon(s) Summons, # (8) Summon(s) Summons)(Reiss, Andrew)
Nov 12, 2020	1	Complaint (Exhibit Exhibit) (2) Docket Text: COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement against All Defendants. Filing fees $ 400.00. Pay.gov Agency Tracking ID FLSDC-13854740, payment transferred from : 20cv24640, filed by Signify North America Corporation and Signify Holding B.V.. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit Exhibit, # (2) Exhibit Exhibit, # (3) Exhibit Exhibit, # (4) Exhibit Exhibit, # (5) Exhibit Exhibit, # (6) Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, # (7) Summon(s) Summons, # (8) Summon(s) Summons)(Reiss, Andrew)
Nov 12, 2020	1	Complaint (Exhibit Exhibit) (2) Docket Text: COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement against All Defendants. Filing fees $ 400.00. Pay.gov Agency Tracking ID FLSDC-13854740, payment transferred from : 20cv24640, filed by Signify North America Corporation and Signify Holding B.V.. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit Exhibit, # (2) Exhibit Exhibit, # (3) Exhibit Exhibit, # (4) Exhibit Exhibit, # (5) Exhibit Exhibit, # (6) Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, # (7) Summon(s) Summons, # (8) Summon(s) Summons)(Reiss, Andrew)
Nov 12, 2020	1	Complaint (Exhibit Exhibit) (2) Docket Text: COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement against All Defendants. Filing fees $ 400.00. Pay.gov Agency Tracking ID FLSDC-13854740, payment transferred from : 20cv24640, filed by Signify North America Corporation and Signify Holding B.V.. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit Exhibit, # (2) Exhibit Exhibit, # (3) Exhibit Exhibit, # (4) Exhibit Exhibit, # (5) Exhibit Exhibit, # (6) Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, # (7) Summon(s) Summons, # (8) Summon(s) Summons)(Reiss, Andrew)
Nov 12, 2020	1	Complaint (Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet) (2) Docket Text: COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement against All Defendants. Filing fees $ 400.00. Pay.gov Agency Tracking ID FLSDC-13854740, payment transferred from : 20cv24640, filed by Signify North America Corporation and Signify Holding B.V.. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit Exhibit, # (2) Exhibit Exhibit, # (3) Exhibit Exhibit, # (4) Exhibit Exhibit, # (5) Exhibit Exhibit, # (6) Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, # (7) Summon(s) Summons, # (8) Summon(s) Summons)(Reiss, Andrew)
Nov 12, 2020	1	Complaint (Summon(s) Summons) (2) Docket Text: COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement against All Defendants. Filing fees $ 400.00. Pay.gov Agency Tracking ID FLSDC-13854740, payment transferred from : 20cv24640, filed by Signify North America Corporation and Signify Holding B.V.. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit Exhibit, # (2) Exhibit Exhibit, # (3) Exhibit Exhibit, # (4) Exhibit Exhibit, # (5) Exhibit Exhibit, # (6) Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, # (7) Summon(s) Summons, # (8) Summon(s) Summons)(Reiss, Andrew)
Nov 12, 2020	1	Complaint (Summon(s) Summons) (2) Docket Text: COMPLAINT for Patent Infringement against All Defendants. Filing fees $ 400.00. Pay.gov Agency Tracking ID FLSDC-13854740, payment transferred from : 20cv24640, filed by Signify North America Corporation and Signify Holding B.V.. (Attachments: # (1) Exhibit Exhibit, # (2) Exhibit Exhibit, # (3) Exhibit Exhibit, # (4) Exhibit Exhibit, # (5) Exhibit Exhibit, # (6) Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, # (7) Summon(s) Summons, # (8) Summon(s) Summons)(Reiss, Andrew)
Nov 12, 2020	N/A	Clerk's Notice of Judge Assignment (0) Docket Text: Clerks Notice of Judge Assignment to Chief Judge K. Michael Moore. Pursuant to 28 USC 636(c), the parties are hereby notified that the U.S. Magistrate Judge Lurana S. Snow is available to handle any or all proceedings in this case. If agreed, parties should complete and file the Consent form found on our website. It is not necessary to file a document indicating lack of consent. Pro se (NON-PRISONER) litigants may receive Notices of Electronic Filings (NEFS) via email after filing a Consent by Pro Se Litigant (NON-PRISONER) to Receive Notices of Electronic Filing. The consent form is available under the forms section of our website. (jao)
Nov 12, 2020	3	Summons Issued (2) Docket Text: Summons Issued as to Robe Lighting Inc, Robe Lighting S.R.O. (jao)
Nov 12, 2020	4	Form AO 120/121 (Main Document) (1) Docket Text: FORM AO 120 SENT TO DIRECTOR OF U.S. PATENT AND TRADEMARK (Attachments: # (1) Supplement Complaint and Exhibits) (jao)
Nov 12, 2020	4	Form AO 120/121 (Supplement Complaint and Exhibits) (30) Docket Text: FORM AO 120 SENT TO DIRECTOR OF U.S. PATENT AND TRADEMARK (Attachments: # (1) Supplement Complaint and Exhibits) (jao)
Nov 12, 2020	5	Bar Letter (3) Docket Text: Bar Letter re: Admissions sent to attorney Jeremy P. Oczek, Jessica L. Copeland, George R. McGuire, Jonathan L. Gray, mailing date 11/12/2020, (cco)

Lawsuits

Signify North America Corporation et al v. Robe Lighting Inc et al > Documents