Sigray Inc. v. Carl Zeiss X Ray Microscopy Inc. > Summary
Court Case Number IPR2022-00218
Filing Date Nov 18, 2021
Institution Decision Date May 23, 2022
Decision Date May 22, 2023
Court Patent Trial and Appeal Board
Status Final Written Decision - Appeale
Appeal2023-2211
Administrative JudgesElizabeth M. Roesel, Grace Karaffa Obermann, Georgianna W. Braden
Judge Writing the Final DecisionElizabeth M. Roesel
Claims Challenged in the Petition: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15
Claims Instituted: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15
Petitioner
Patent Owner
Petitioner Attorneys
3Sigray
Attorney Name: Craig S. Summers
Knobbe Martens
Sigray
Attorney Name: Alan G. Laquer
Knobbe Martens
Sigray
Attorney Name: Jamie E. Youngblood
Knobbe Martens
Patent Owner Attorneys
9Carl Zeiss X-Ray Microscopy, Inc.
Attorney Name: John C. Phillips
Fish & Richardson
Carl Zeiss X-Ray Microscopy, Inc.
Attorney Name: Dianna Bradley
Fish & Richardson
Carl Zeiss X-Ray Microscopy, Inc.
Attorney Name: Jacob B. Pecht
Fish & Richardson
Carl Zeiss X-Ray Microscopy, Inc.
Attorney Name: Kurt L. Glitzenstein
Fish & Richardson
Carl Zeiss X-Ray Microscopy, Inc.
Attorney Name: Susan E. Morrison
Fish & Richardson
Carl Zeiss X-Ray Microscopy, Inc.
Attorney Name: Julie Bentley
Fish & Richardson
Carl Zeiss X-Ray Microscopy, Inc.
Attorney Name: Omid Kia
Fish & Richardson
Carl Zeiss X-Ray Microscopy, Inc.
Attorney Name: Gonzalo R. Arce
Fish & Richardson
Related Patents
| Doc No | Title | Issue date |
|---|---|---|
| 07400704 | High resolution direct-projection type x-ray microtomography system using synchrotron or laboratory-based x-ray source | Jul 15, 2008 |
