Smith & Nephew Inc. v. ConforMIS, Inc. > Summary
Court Case Number IPR2017-00778
Filing Date Jan 26, 2017
Institution Decision Date Aug 7, 2017
Decision Date Sep 26, 2018
Court Patent Trial and Appeal Board
Status Terminated-Settled
Administrative JudgesJames A. Worth, Patrick R. Scanlon, Amanda F. Wieker
Judge Writing the Final DecisionJames A. Worth
Claims Challenged in the Petition: 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 11, 13, 18, 20, 21, 24, 25, 28, 29, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 47
Claims Instituted: 1, 2, 3, 5, 6, 7, 8, 11, 20, 21, 24, 25, 28, 29, 34, 35, 36, 37, 47
Petitioner
Patent Owner
Petitioner Attorneys
5Smith & Nephew
Attorney Name: Christy G. Lea
Knobbe Martens
Smith & Nephew
Attorney Name: Joseph Robert Re
Knobbe Martens
Smith & Nephew
Attorney Name: Colin B. Heideman
Knobbe Martens
Attorney Name: Benjamin B. Anger
Knobbe Martens
Smith & Nephew
Attorney Name: Jay D. Mabrey
Knobbe Martens
Patent Owner Attorneys
5Lang Patent Law
Attorney Name: Daniel F. Klodowski
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner
Lang Patent Law
Attorney Name: Timothy P. McAnulty
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner
Lang Patent Law
Attorney Name: Sanya Sukduang
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner
Attorney Name: Lauren K. Young
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner
Related Patents
Doc No | Title | Issue date |
---|---|---|
08062302 | Surgical tools for arthroplasty | Nov 22, 2011 |