Case number 1:19-cv-01179
Solid 21, Inc. v. Jomashop Inc. > Documents
| Date Field | Doc. No. | Description (Pages) |
|---|---|---|
| May 25, 2021 | 54 | Notice of Report on the filing of an action regarding a Patent or Trademark. (Attachments: # 1 Electronic Order Dismissing Case) (Hong, Loan) (Entered: 05/25/2021) (0) |
| May 24, 2021 | N/A | Case Reassigned to Magistrate Judge Taryn A. Merkl. Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara no longer assigned to the case. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Mahoney, Brenna) (Entered: 05/24/2021) (0) |
| May 21, 2021 | 53 | STIPULATION AND ORDER DISMISSING CASE. The above-referenced action is hereby dismissed without prejudice. Ordered by Chief Judge Margo K. Brodie on 5/21/2021. (Valentin, Winnethka) (Entered: 05/21/2021) (1) |
| May 20, 2021 | 52 | STIPULATION of Dismissal Without Prejudice Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. Rule 41(a)(1)(A)(ii), by Solid 21, Inc. (Hecht, David) (Entered: 05/20/2021) (1) |
| May 12, 2021 | N/A | ORDER: In light of this case's pending reassignment to another Magistrate Judge, the settlement conference on 5/20/2021 and status conference on 9/1/2021 are adjourned sine die. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara on 5/12/2021. (Altreuter, Sylvia) (Entered: 05/12/2021) (0) |
| Apr 20, 2021 | N/A | ORDER: The Court declines to enter the stipulation 51 staying this matter pending the resolution of two other matters in two other Districts which are on different discovery schedules. The parties contend that discovery in the various cases overlap; if so, the proper course would be to agree to use the discovery in one or both of the other cases in this case. To the extent that the parties believe that litigating this case while the other cases are pending would lead to inconsistent judgments, the proper course would be for Plaintiff to dismiss this case without prejudice; the parties to enter into a tolling agreement on the statute of limitations, if appropriate; and refile this case, if necessary. Plaintiff chose to file this action in this District; the mere existence of other litigation in other districts does not counsel a stay of this action, unless there was a settlement pending that would resolve all three matters in one stroke. But that is not the situation here, where the parties wish to continue litigating elsewhere, but not here, and simply place this case in suspension. Doing so--without knowledge of the resolution of those other cases, which cannot be known at this time--risks that this case restarts in months or years, thereby delaying ultimate resolution. The Court does not countenance such an approach. The stipulation is rejected, the motion to stay is denied, and the Rule 16 schedule in this case remains operative. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara on 4/20/2021. (Altreuter, Sylvia) (Entered: 04/20/2021) (0) |
| Apr 19, 2021 | 51 | Joint MOTION to Stay the Action by Stipulation and Proposed Order by Jomashop Inc.. (Thomashower, William) (Entered: 04/19/2021) (3) |
| Mar 25, 2021 | N/A | REQUEST for Certificate of Default is denied at this time as per Judge Bulsara's Order dated 3/18/2021. re 48 Request for Certificate of Default (Poveda, J.) (Entered: 03/25/2021) (0) |
| Mar 19, 2021 | 50 | ANSWER to 44 Answer to Amended Complaint,,, Counterclaim,, by Solid 21, Inc.. (Hecht, David) (Entered: 03/19/2021) (4) |
| Mar 18, 2021 | N/A | ORDER: Plaintiff's motion for leave to file a belated answer to Defendant's counterclaims 49 is granted. Plaintiff has established that the factors set out in Enron Oil Corp. v. Diakuhara, 10 F.3d 90, 96 (2d Cir. 1993), namely "(1) whether the default was willful; (2) whether setting aside the default would prejudice the adversary; and (3) whether a meritorious defense is presented," weigh in favor of granting the motion. First, Plaintiff has established that its default was not willful, but the result of attorney negligence. See, e.g., Am. Alliance Ins. Co. v. Eagle Ins. Co., 92 F.3d 57, 61 (2d Cir. 1996) (finding that vacatur of a default was justified where the default was caused by "a filing mistake" by defendant's in-house legal department). Second, the Court finds that Defendant will not be prejudiced by the short delay. GEICO v. Jacobson, No. 15-CV-7236, 2019 WL 10959842, at *3-4 (E.D.N.Y. Oct. 15, 2019) (finding no prejudice following a "one-month delay"), report and recommendation adopted, Order (Nov. 6, 2019). And third, Plaintiff indicates that it is promptly prepared to file an answer, which denotes that a meritorious defense may be present; the Court's preference is to resolve cases on the merits, not on default. For these reasons, Plaintiff's motion is granted, and it shall file its answer as a separate docket entry by 3/22/2021. The Clerk of Court will deny Defendant's request 48 for entry of default. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara on 3/18/2021. (Altreuter, Sylvia) (Entered: 03/18/2021) (0) |
| Mar 17, 2021 | 49 | MOTION for Leave to File Document Answer to Defendant Jomashop Inc.'s Counterclaims and Opposition to Defendant's Request for Default by Solid 21, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of David L. Hecht, # 2 Exhibit A - Answers to Counterclaims) (Hecht, David) (Entered: 03/17/2021) (0) |
| Mar 16, 2021 | 48 | Request for Certificate of Default by Jomashop Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Proposed Order (Proposed Certificate of Default), # 2 Declaration of William Thomashower, # 3 Exhibit 1 to Thomashower Declaration) (Thomashower, William) (Entered: 03/16/2021) (0) |
| Feb 3, 2021 | N/A | SCHEDULING ORDER: The proposed discovery plan 47 is adopted. The deadline for the close of fact discovery is 9/6/2021, the deadline for the close of all discovery is 1/3/2022, and the deadline for the parties to take the first step in dispositive motion practice is 1/31/2022. A status conference will be held on 9/1/2021 at 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara in Courtroom 324 North.A settlement conference will be held by video on 5/20/2021 at 10:30 AM before Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara. Parties are to submit their respective ex parte settlement positions via Chambers email no later than three days before 5/20/2021. With their settlement positions, counsel should provide email addresses and phone numbers for counsel and client representatives so the Court can connect them to the video conference. Counsel are to refer to the Settlement Section of this Court's Individual Rules in preparation for the conference, which is available on the Courts website. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara on 2/3/2021. (Altreuter, Sylvia) (Entered: 02/03/2021) (0) |
| Feb 2, 2021 | 47 | Proposed Scheduling Order (Joint Proposed Discovery Plan Worksheet) by Jomashop Inc. (Thomashower, William) (Entered: 02/02/2021) (2) |
| Jan 20, 2021 | N/A | ORDER: The motion for extension of time to file 46 is granted. The deadline for the parties to submit a discovery plan worksheet is extended to 2/2/2021. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara on 1/20/2021. (Altreuter, Sylvia) (Entered: 01/20/2021) (0) |
| Jan 19, 2021 | 46 | Joint MOTION for Extension of Time to File Discovery Plan Worksheet (ECF 8) by Solid 21, Inc.. (Hecht, David) (Entered: 01/19/2021) (1) |
| Jan 10, 2021 | N/A | ORDER: The parties are directed to jointly submit a proposed discovery plan worksheet 8 by 1/19/2021. Should the parties wish to adopt a plan for discovery different from the structure in the worksheet, they may do so only if they file a letter explaining why such a plan is appropriate in this case. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara on 1/10/2021. (Altreuter, Sylvia) (Entered: 01/10/2021) (0) |
| Jan 8, 2021 | 45 | Corporate Disclosure Statement by Jomashop Inc. (Thomashower, William) (Entered: 01/08/2021) (1) |
| Jan 8, 2021 | 44 | Jomashop Inc.'s ANSWER to 19 Amended Complaint,, (Second Amended Complaint), COUNTERCLAIM S against Solid 21, Inc. by Jomashop Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A- Plaintiff's TM Application for SIGNATURE RED GOLD, # 2 Exhibit B- Prosecution History for Plaintiffs TM Application, # 3 Exhibit C- Office Action dated March 29, 2019, # 4 Exhibit D- Notice of Abandonment and Status of Application, # 5 Exhibit E- Plaintiff's Petition to Revive, # 6 Exhibit F- Office Action dated July 2, 2020) (Thomashower, William) (Entered: 01/08/2021) (0) |
| Jan 4, 2021 | N/A | ORDER: The motion for extension of time to file answer 40 is granted. Defendant Jomashop Inc. ("Defendant") has established that the factors set out in Enron Oil Corp. v. Diakuhara, 10 F.3d 90, 96 (2d Cir. 1993), namely "(1) whether the default was willful; (2) whether setting aside the default would prejudice the adversary; and (3) whether a meritorious defense is presented," weigh in favor of granting the motion. With respect to the first factor, Defendant argues that the default was not willful but, instead, the result of a mistake by counsel. Namely, counsel states that he "did not see" that new counsel had appeared on behalf of Plaintiff, (Dkt. No. 42 11-12), and thus assumed "that Plaintiff would be unrepresented and that the action would likely be dismissed," (Dkt. No. 41 at 10-11). While Defendant acknowledges it was aware of its obligation to respond to the Complaint and instead chose not to, "bearing in mind the strong preference for resolution of disputes on the merits, the Court concludes that this may not be the sort of 'willfulness' and 'bad faith'" that justifies entry of default. Miller v. Experian, 183 F.R.D. 364, 369 (E.D.N.Y. 1998) (finding that, although a defendant was "[a]t the very least,... negligent and deliberately indifferent," its conduct was not willful). With respect to the second factor, the Court also finds that, although Plaintiff has not consented to the extension, it will not be prejudiced where the delay was "only a day or so." Enron Oil Corp., 10 F.3d at 97. And with respect to the third and final factor, Defendant is prepared to promptly file an answer and continue with litigation, which indicates that a meritorious defense may be present. For these reasons, Defendant's motion is granted, and Defendant shall file its answer by 1/8/2021. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara on 1/4/2021. (Altreuter, Sylvia) (Entered: 01/04/2021) (0) |
| Dec 29, 2020 | 43 | NOTICE of Appearance by Stephanie Paola Chery on behalf of Jomashop Inc. (aty to be noticed) (Chery, Stephanie) (Entered: 12/29/2020) (1) |
| Dec 23, 2020 | 42 | AFFIDAVIT/DECLARATION in Support re 40 Notice of MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Answer,,, by William Thomashower filed by Jomashop Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B) (Thomashower, William) (Entered: 12/23/2020) (0) |
| Dec 23, 2020 | 41 | MEMORANDUM in Support re 40 Notice of MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Answer,,, filed by Jomashop Inc.. (Thomashower, William) (Entered: 12/23/2020) (18) |
| Dec 23, 2020 | 40 | Notice of MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re Order on Motion for Extension of Time to Answer,,, by Jomashop Inc.. (Thomashower, William) (Entered: 12/23/2020) (1) |
| Dec 16, 2020 | N/A | ORDER: The motion for extension of time to answer 39 is denied. On 11/30/2020, the Court issued a Memorandum and Order 35 denying in part Defendant's motion to dismiss. Pursuant to Rule 12(a)(4)(A) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure, Defendant's answer to the Second Amended Complaint 19 was due within 14 days of the decision, which was 12/14/2020. Because Defendant seeks to extend the time to answer after the deadline has passed, it must file a motion by 12/23/2020 that explains why, under the standards set forth in Enron Oil Corp. v. Diakuhara, 10 F.3d 90, 96 (2d Cir. 1993), a belated answer is permissible, and why a default should not be entered. Biwen Liang v. Home Reno Concepts, LLC, 803 F. App'x 444, 446 n.2 (2d Cir. 2020). So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara on 12/16/2020. (Altreuter, Sylvia) (Entered: 12/16/2020) (0) |
| Dec 15, 2020 | 39 | First MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re 19 Amended Complaint,, (Second) by Jomashop Inc.. (Thomashower, William) (Entered: 12/15/2020) (3) |
| Dec 15, 2020 | N/A | ORDER: The motion to withdraw as attorney 33 is granted. Attorney John Mark Pierce is hereby removed from the docket. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara on 12/15/2020. (Altreuter, Sylvia) (Entered: 12/15/2020) (0) |
| Dec 14, 2020 | 38 | NOTICE of Appearance by David Lawrence Hecht on behalf of Solid 21, Inc. (notification declined or already on case) (Hecht, David) (Entered: 12/14/2020) (1) |
| Dec 14, 2020 | 37 | STATUS REPORT by Solid 21, Inc. (Pierce, John) (Entered: 12/14/2020) (1) |
| Dec 1, 2020 | 36 | CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Solid 21, Inc. re Motion Hearing,,, (Pierce, John) (Entered: 12/01/2020) (1) |
| Dec 1, 2020 | N/A | ORDER: In light of the Memorandum and Order 35 , the parties are directed to submit a joint schedule for the completion of discovery by 2/1/2021. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara on 12/1/2020. (Altreuter, Sylvia) (Entered: 12/01/2020) (0) |
| Nov 30, 2020 | 35 | MEMORANDUM AND ORDER. The Court grants in part and denies in part Defendant's motion to dismiss. The Court grants Defendant's motion as to Plaintiff's trademark dilution claim under the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. 1125(c), and PlaintiMEMORANDUM AND ORDER. The Court grants in part and denies in part Defendant's motion to dismiss. The Court grants Defendant's motion as to Plaintiff's trademark dilution claim under the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. 1125(c), and Plaintiff's deceptive acts and practices claim under New York General Business Law 349 and dismisses these claims. The Court denies Defendant's motion as to Plaintiff's claims of trademark infringement under the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. &ff's deceptive acts and practices claim under New York General Business Law 349 and dismisses these claims. The Court denies Defendant's motion as to Plaintiff's claims of trademark infringement under the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. 1114(1), 1125(a), and the New York common law; unfair competition and false description under the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. 1125(a); and trademark dilution under New York General Business Law 360-l. Ordered by Judge Margo K. Br#167; 1114(1), 1125(a), and the New York common law; unfair competition and false description under the Lanham Act, 15 U.S.C. 1125(a); and trademark dilution under New York General Business Law 360-l. Ordered by Judge Margo K. Brodie on 11/30/2020. (Valentin, Winnethka) (Entered: 11/30/2020) (30) |
| Nov 30, 2020 | N/A | Minute Entry and Order: A hearing on Plaintiff's counsel's motion to withdraw 33 was held on 11/30/2020 before Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara. Counsel for Plaintiff and Defendant were present. As stated on the record, Plaintiff shall file a status report by 12/14/2020 on whether new counsel has been procured. If new counsel has not appeared by that time, the motion to withdraw shall be granted. If Plaintiff has not procured new counsel by 1/13/2021, as corporations may not proceed pro se in federal court, the action will be dismissed. Plaintiff's counsel is directed to serve this Minute Entry and Order on a representative of Plaintiff and file proof of service on the docket. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara on 11/30/2020. (AT&T Log #10:01 - 10:10 AM.) (Altreuter, Sylvia) (Entered: 11/30/2020) (0) |
| Oct 16, 2020 | 34 | CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE by Solid 21, Inc. re Order Setting Hearing on Motion,,,, (Pierce, John) (Entered: 10/16/2020) (1) |
| Oct 14, 2020 | N/A | ORDER: A telephonic hearing on the motion to withdraw as attorney 33 will be held on 11/30/2020 at 10:00 AM before Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara. The parties shall dial the toll-free number: 877-336-1274. The access code is: 6534420. The parties shall dial in five (5) minutes before the 10 AM hearing. Plaintiff is reminded that corporations may not proceed pro se in federal court. See Premium Sports, Inc. v. Mendes, No. 17-CV-1309, 2018 WL 2078488, at *5 (E.D.N.Y. Mar. 1, 2018) (citing Shapiro, Bernstein & Co. v. Cont'l Record Co., 386 F.2d 426, 427 (2d Cir. 1967) (per curiam) ("[I]t is settled law that a corporation cannot appear other than by its attorney.")). Failure to obtain substitute counsel will result in a dismissal of this action. Plaintiff's counsel is directed to serve this order on a representative of Plaintiff and file proof of service on the docket. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara on 10/14/2020. (Altreuter, Sylvia) (Entered: 10/14/2020) (0) |
| Oct 13, 2020 | 33 | MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney by Solid 21, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of John M. Pierce) (Pierce, John) (Entered: 10/13/2020) (0) |
| Aug 25, 2020 | 32 | NOTICE of Change of Law Firm Once the filing has been made, you must login to www.pacer.gov and update your account. (Pierce, John) (Entered: 08/25/2020) (1) |
| May 5, 2020 | N/A | ORDER: The Motion to Withdraw as Attorney 31 is granted. Attorney David Lawrence Hecht is hereby withdrawn from the case. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara on 5/5/2020. (Guo, Alicia) (Entered: 05/05/2020) (0) |
| May 4, 2020 | 31 | Letter MOTION to Withdraw as Attorney by David L. Hecht by Solid 21, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Declaration of David L. Hecht) (Hecht, David) (Entered: 05/04/2020) (0) |
| May 1, 2020 | N/A | ORDER: The Motion of John Pierce for Leave to Appear Pro Hac Vice 29 is granted. The attorney shall register for ECF, registration is available online at www.pacer.gov. Once registered, the attorney shall file a notice of appearance and ensure that s/he receives electronic notification of activity in this case. Also, the attorney shall ensure that the 150 admission fee is submitted to the Clerks Office via filing the event Pro Hac Vice Filing Fee. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara on 5/1/2020. (Guo, Alicia) (Entered: 05/01/2020) (0) |
| May 1, 2020 | 30 | NOTICE of Appearance by John Mark Pierce on behalf of Solid 21, Inc. (notification declined or already on case) (Pierce, John) (Entered: 05/01/2020) (1) |
| Apr 30, 2020 | 29 | MOTION to Appear Pro Hac Vice Filing fee $ 150, receipt number ANYEDC-12738772. by Solid 21, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Pierce Affidavit in Support of PHV Admission, # 2 Certificate of Good Standing) (Pierce, John) (Entered: 04/30/2020) (0) |
| Dec 17, 2019 | 28 | Letter Enclosing Courtesy Copies of Defendant's Motion to Dismiss the Second Amended Complaint by Jomashop Inc. (Matte, Rebecca) (Entered: 12/17/2019) (2) |
| Dec 17, 2019 | 27 | RESPONSE in Opposition re 23 Notice of MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint filed by Solid 21, Inc.. (Hecht, David) (Entered: 12/17/2019) (27) |
| Dec 16, 2019 | 26 | REPLY in Support re 23 Notice of MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint filed by Jomashop Inc.. (Matte, Rebecca) (Entered: 12/16/2019) (16) |
| Dec 16, 2019 | 25 | MEMORANDUM in Support re 23 Notice of MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint filed by Jomashop Inc.. (Matte, Rebecca) (Entered: 12/16/2019) (29) |
| Dec 16, 2019 | 24 | AFFIDAVIT/DECLARATION in Support re 23 Notice of MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint by William Thomashower filed by Jomashop Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A - Second Amended Complaint & Exhibits) (Matte, Rebecca) (Entered: 12/16/2019) (0) |
| Dec 16, 2019 | 23 | Notice of MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim Plaintiff's Second Amended Complaint by Jomashop Inc.. (Matte, Rebecca) (Entered: 12/16/2019) (2) |
| Nov 21, 2019 | 22 | Letter concerning service of Plaintiffs Opposition to Defendants Motion to Dismiss by Solid 21, Inc. (Hecht, David) (Entered: 11/21/2019) (1) |
| Nov 5, 2019 | N/A | ORDER granting 21 Motion for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply. Plaintiff shall serve its response on or before November 21, 2019; defendant shall serve and file its reply on or before December 16, 2019. Ordered by Judge Margo K. Brodie on 11/5/2019. (Beeney, Eliza) (Entered: 11/05/2019) (0) |
| Nov 4, 2019 | 21 | Letter MOTION for Extension of Time to File Response/Reply as to Pre Motion Conference,,, Deadlines regarding Motion to Dismiss by Solid 21, Inc.. (Hecht, David) (Entered: 11/04/2019) (1) |
| Oct 17, 2019 | 20 | Letter Concerning Service of Motion to Dismiss Papers by Jomashop Inc. (Matte, Rebecca) (Entered: 10/17/2019) (1) |
| Sep 19, 2019 | 19 | AMENDED COMPLAINT against Jomashop Inc., filed by Solid 21, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1 - Trademark Certificate, # 2 Exhibit 2 - Notice of Incontestability, # 3 Exhibit 3 - Notice of Acceptance, # 4 Exhibit 4 - Joint Press Release, # 5 Exhibit 5 - CNN Article, # 6 Exhibit 6 - RED GOLD ad, # 7 Exhibit 7 - Celebrity Client, # 8 Exhibit 8 - Parlay GMT Black Watch, # 9 Exhibit 9 - Aire Traveler II GMT Watch, # 10 Exhibit 10 - Aire Conqueror Mens Watch, # 11 Exhibit 11 - Example of Infringing Use, # 12 Exhibit 12 - Example of Infringing Use, # 13 Exhibit 13 - Example of Infringing Use, # 14 Exhibit 14 - List of Additional Infringing Uses) (Hecht, David) (Entered: 09/19/2019) (0) |
| Sep 6, 2019 | N/A | ORDER: In light of the stay of discovery, the in person settlement conference scheduled for 12/19/2019 before Magistrate Judge Bulsara is hereby adjourned sine die. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara on 9/6/2019. (Guo, Alicia) (Entered: 09/06/2019) (0) |
| Sep 5, 2019 | N/A | Minute Entry for proceedings held before Judge Margo K. Brodie: The Court heard arguments on Defendant's anticipated motion to dismiss. For the reasons stated on the record, the Court dismissed the Amended Complaint for failure to state a claim. Plaintiff shall file a second amended complaint on or before September 19, 2019. Should Defendant seek to dismiss the second amended complaint, it shall serve its motion on or before October 17, 2019. Plaintiff shall serve any opposition on or before November 14, 2019, and Defendant shall serve and file any reply on or before December 2, 2019. For the reasons stated on the record, the Court stays discovery pending a decision on Defendant's anticipated motion. If Defendant does not serve a motion on or before October 17, 2019, all prior discovery orders shall be reinstated. (Beeney, Eliza) (Entered: 09/05/2019) (0) |
| Sep 4, 2019 | 18 | AMENDED COMPLAINT against Jomashop Inc., filed by Solid 21, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1 - Certificate of Registration, # 2 Exhibit 2 - Notice of Acceptance, # 3 Exhibit 3 - Notice of Acceptance, # 4 Exhibit 4 - Press Release, # 5 Exhibit 5 - Webpage, # 6 Exhibit 6 - Webpage, # 7 Exhibit 7 - Webpage) (Hecht, David) (Entered: 09/04/2019) (0) |
| Aug 27, 2019 | N/A | Minute Entry and Order for proceedings held before Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara: An in person initial conference was held on 8/27/2019. Counsel for both parties were present. As discussed on the record, the parties shall file a re-vised proposed discovery plan worksheet by 9/9/2019. An in person settlement conference will take place on 12/19/2019 at 2:00 P.M. in Courtroom 324N before Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara. All parties must be present. Parties are to submit their respective ex parte settlement positions via Chambers email no later than three days before 12/19/2019. Counsel are to refer to the Settlement Section of this Court's Individual Rules in preparation for the conference, which is available on the Courts website. So ordered by Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara on 8/27/2019. (FTR Log #2:10:49-2:46:00.) (Manson, Eddie) (Entered: 08/27/2019) (0) |
| Aug 23, 2019 | 17 | NOTICE by Solid 21, Inc. re 8 Scheduling Order,,, of Filing of Proposed Discovery Plan Worksheet filed pursuant to Court's Order (Hecht, David) (Entered: 08/23/2019) (5) |
| Aug 22, 2019 | N/A | ORDER: The Motion to Adjourn Conference 16 is granted. The in person initial conference scheduled for 8/23/2019 is hereby adjourned to 8/27/2019 at 2:00 P.M. in Courtroom 324N before Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara. All counsel must attend. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara on 8/22/2019. (Manson, Eddie) (Entered: 08/22/2019) (0) |
| Aug 21, 2019 | 16 | Joint MOTION to Adjourn Conference Before Magistrate Judge Bulsara by Jomashop Inc.. (Thomashower, William) (Entered: 08/21/2019) (2) |
| Aug 16, 2019 | N/A | ORDER: The motion to adjourn 14 is denied. The initial conference will proceed as scheduled on 8/23/2019 at 11:00 AM in Courtroom 324N before Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara on 8/16/2019. (Murphy, Colleen) (Entered: 08/16/2019) (0) |
| Aug 15, 2019 | N/A | ORDER granting 15 Motion to Adjourn Conference. The pre motion conference scheduled for September 6, 2019 is rescheduled to September 5, 2019 at 11AM. Ordered by Judge Margo K. Brodie on 8/15/2019. (Beeney, Eliza) (Entered: 08/15/2019) (0) |
| Aug 15, 2019 | 15 | Letter MOTION to Adjourn Conference Before Judge Brodie on Defendant's Proposed Motion to Dismiss by Jomashop Inc.. (Matte, Rebecca) (Entered: 08/15/2019) (2) |
| Aug 15, 2019 | 14 | Joint MOTION to Adjourn Conference Before Magistrate Judge Bulsara by Jomashop Inc.. (Matte, Rebecca) (Entered: 08/15/2019) (2) |
| Aug 12, 2019 | N/A | ORDER granting 12 Motion for Pre Motion Conference. Pre motion conference is scheduled for September 6, 2019 at 11AM. Ordered by Judge Margo K. Brodie on 8/12/2019. (Beeney, Eliza) (Entered: 08/12/2019) (0) |
| Aug 8, 2019 | 13 | Letter In Response to Defendants Pre-Motion Conference Letter by Solid 21, Inc. (Hecht, David) (Entered: 08/08/2019) (3) |
| Aug 1, 2019 | N/A | ORDER re 12 Letter motion for pre motion conference. The Court directs Plaintiff to respond to Defendant's letter on or before August 8, 2019. Ordered by Judge Margo K. Brodie on 8/1/2019. (Beeney, Eliza) (Entered: 08/01/2019) (0) |
| Jul 30, 2019 | 12 | Letter MOTION for pre motion conference on Motion to Dismiss the Complaint by Jomashop Inc.. (Matte, Rebecca) (Entered: 07/30/2019) (3) |
| Jul 30, 2019 | 11 | NOTICE of Appearance by Rebecca Lynn Matte on behalf of Jomashop Inc. (aty to be noticed) (Matte, Rebecca) (Entered: 07/30/2019) (1) |
| Jul 4, 2019 | N/A | ORDER: The motion for extension of time 10 is granted. The deadline for Defendant Jomashop Inc. to answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint is hereby extended to 8/2/2019. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara on 7/4/2019. (Murphy, Colleen) (Entered: 07/04/2019) (0) |
| Jul 3, 2019 | 10 | Letter MOTION for Extension of Time to File Answer re 1 Complaint,, or to move by Jomashop Inc.. (Thomashower, William) (Entered: 07/03/2019) (2) |
| Jul 2, 2019 | 9 | NOTICE of Appearance by William Jay Thomashower on behalf of Jomashop Inc. (aty to be noticed) (Thomashower, William) (Entered: 07/02/2019) (1) |
| Jun 19, 2019 | 8 | SCHEDULING ORDER: An in-person initial conference will be held at 11:00 A.M. on 8/23/2019 before Magistrate Judge Bulsara in Courtroom 324N. All counsel must attend. Plaintiff is directed to notify Defendant of this scheduling order at the time that Defendant makes an appearance in this matter. Counsel are also directed to complete the attached Discovery Plan Worksheet and electronically file same with the Court no later than two days before 8/23/2019. Should the parties wish to adopt a plan for discovery different from the structure in the discovery worksheet, they may do so only if they file a letter explaining why such a plan is appropriate in this case. So Ordered by Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara on 6/19/2019. (Manson, Eddie) (Entered: 06/19/2019) (6) |
| Jun 12, 2019 | 7 | SUMMONS Returned Executed by Solid 21, Inc.. Jomashop Inc. served on 6/12/2019, answer due 7/3/2019. (Hecht, David) (Entered: 06/12/2019) (1) |
| Mar 1, 2019 | 6 | Notice of Report on the filing of an action regarding a Patent or Trademark. (Attachments: # 1 Complaint) (Hong, Loan) (Entered: 03/01/2019) (0) |
| Feb 28, 2019 | 5 | This attorney case opening filing has been checked for quality control. See the attachment for corrections that were made, if any. (Bowens, Priscilla) (Entered: 02/28/2019) (1) |
| Feb 28, 2019 | 4 | In accordance with Rule 73 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and Local Rule 73.1, the parties are notified that if all parties consent a United States magistrate judge of this court is available to conduct all proceedings in this civil action including a (jury or nonjury) trial and to order the entry of a final judgment. Attached to the Notice is a blank copy of the consent form that should be filled out, signed and filed electronically only if all parties wish to consent. The form may also be accessed at the following link: http://www.uscourts.gov/uscourts/FormsAndFees/Forms/AO085.pdf. You may withhold your consent without adverse substantive consequences. Do NOT return or file the consent unless all parties have signed the consent. (Bowens, Priscilla) (Entered: 02/28/2019) (2) |
| Feb 28, 2019 | 3 | Summons Issued as to Jomashop Inc.. (Bowens, Priscilla) (Entered: 02/28/2019) (2) |
| Feb 28, 2019 | N/A | Case assigned to Judge Margo K. Brodie and Magistrate Judge Sanket J. Bulsara. Please download and review the Individual Practices of the assigned Judges, located on our website. Attorneys are responsible for providing courtesy copies to judges where their Individual Practices require such. (Bowens, Priscilla) (Entered: 02/28/2019) (0) |
| Feb 28, 2019 | 2 | NOTICE by Solid 21, Inc. re 1 Complaint,, AO120 - REPORT ON THE FILING OR DETERMINATION OF AN ACTION REGARDING A PATENT OR TRADEMARK (Hecht, David) (Entered: 02/28/2019) (1) |
| Feb 28, 2019 | 1 | COMPLAINT against All Defendants filing fee $ 400, receipt number ANYEDC-11239895 Was the Disclosure Statement on Civil Cover Sheet completed -Yes,, filed by Solid 21, Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Civil Cover Sheet Civil Cover Sheet, # 2 Exhibit 1 - Certificate of Registration, # 3 Exhibit 2 - Notice of Acceptance and Acknowledgement - 2009, # 4 Exhibit 3 - Notice of Acceptance - 2013, # 5 Exhibit 4 - Joint Press Statement, # 6 Proposed Summons Proposed Summons to Jomashop Inc.) (Hecht, David) (Entered: 02/28/2019) (0) |
