Unified Patents, LLC v. Ideahub, Inc. > Summary
Court Case Number IPR2020-01338
Filing Date Jul 23, 2020
Institution Decision Date Feb 8, 2021
Decision Date Feb 7, 2022
Court Patent Trial and Appeal Board
Status Final Written Decision
Appeal2022-1626
Administrative JudgesScott E. Bain, Bryan F. Moore, Monica S. Ullagaddi
Judge Writing the Final DecisionScott E. Bain
Claims Challenged in the Petition: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
Claims Instituted: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
Claims Invalidated: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9
Petitioner
Patent Owner
Petitioner Attorneys
7Unified Patents
Attorney Name: Ashraf A. Fawzy
Unified Patents
Unified Patents
Attorney Name: Jung S. Hahm
Unified Patents
Unified Patents
Attorney Name: Scott W. Bertulli
Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr
Unified Patents
Attorney Name: Jonathan P. Knight
Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr
Unified Patents
Attorney Name: Trishan Esram
Wilmer Cutler Pickering Hale and Dorr
Unified Patents
Attorney Name: Didier J. Legall
Unified Patents
Patent Owner Attorneys
8Ideahub Inc.
Attorney Name: Timothy Devlin
Devlin Law Firm
Ideahub Inc.
Attorney Name: Leonard A. Monfredo II
Devlin Law Firm
Ideahub Inc.
Attorney Name: Joel W. Glazer
Devlin Law Firm
Ideahub Inc.
Attorney Name: James M. Lennon
Devlin Law Firm
Ideahub Inc.
Attorney Name: Srikant Cheruvu
Devlin Law Firm
Ideahub Inc.
Attorney Name: Veronica McCarty
Devlin Law Firm
Ideahub Inc.
Attorney Name: Mariam E. Clayton
Devlin Law Firm
Ideahub Inc.
Attorney Name: Michael John Anthony Adams
Ideahub Inc.
Related Patents
| Doc No | Title | Issue date |
|---|---|---|
| 08645562 | Apparatus and method for providing streaming content | Feb 4, 2014 |
