Case number 1:23-cv-00002
Web 2.0 Technologies, LLC v. Hive Technology, Inc. > Documents
| Date Field | Doc. No. | Description (Pages) |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 6, 2023 | 20 | Amended Complaint* (1) |
| Oct 10, 2023 | N/A | Pro Hac Vice Attorney Sarah Benowich and Marc J. Rachman for Hive Technology, Inc. added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (mpb) (Entered: 10/10/2023) (0) |
| Oct 5, 2023 | 17 | ORDER (ruling on pending motions to dismiss) SEE ORDER FOR COMPLETE AND FURTHER DETAILS. Signed by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 10/5/2023. (dlw) (Entered: 10/05/2023) (8) |
| Oct 4, 2023 | 16 | Letter to The Honorable Maryellen Noreika from Timothy Devlin regarding Response to Court's Oral Orders. (Devlin, Timothy) (Entered: 10/04/2023) (2) |
| Oct 2, 2023 | 15 | ORAL ORDER - Having reviewed the various Web2.0 Technologies cases filed in this District and beyond, it appears that in certain pending cases with substantially the same infringement allegations, Plaintiff includes as a party Pennar Software Corporation because it is purportedly "the owner by assignment of 100% interest in the Asserted Patents" i.e., U.S. Patent Nos. 6,845,448 and 8,117,644. See, e.g., First Amended Complaint, Web 2.0 Technologies LLC v. 37signals LLC d/b/a Basecamp, No. 1:23-0230 (N.D. Ill. July 11, 2023); First Amended Complaint, Web 2.0 Technologies LLC v. Nulab Inc., No. 1:23-2589 (S.D.N.Y. July 12, 2023); see also First Amended Complaint, Web 2.0 Technologies LLC v. Zendesk, Inc., No. 23-0105-MN (D. Del. Aug. 10, 2023). Pennar Software Corporation is also listed as the assignee on the face of these two patents, which are the only patents asserted in any of the Web2.0 Technologies cases in this District. Yet Pennar Software Corporation is not a plaintiff in the cases pending in this District except one (against Zendesk). THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, on or before October 4, 2023, Plaintiff shall file a letter with the Court explaining the discrepancy in plaintiffs among the various cases and indicating whether Pennar Software Corporation is a required plaintiff in all of the related cases pending before this Court. ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 10/2/2023. (dlw) (Entered: 10/02/2023) (0) |
| Sep 14, 2023 | 14 | ORAL ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order, the parties shall confer regarding proposed dates in the scheduling order and shall submit a proposed, coordinated order, which is also consistent with the following guidance. The parties shall provide final contentions (i.e., final infringement and invalidity contentions, as well as final non-infringement and validity contentions) around the time that fact discovery closes (i.e., several weeks prior to or after the deadline to complete fact discovery) and at least three weeks before Plaintiff serves its opening claim construction brief. Final contentions shall include a party's contentions under its proposed construction(s), as well as under the opposing construction(s) (if such an alternative contention exists). As such, the parties are encouraged to exchange proposed claim terms and proposed constructions early in the case but in no event later than necessary to allow the parties to include alternative contentions in their final contentions. The joint claim construction chart shall be due one week after the parties have completed their exchange of final contentions, and the joint claim construction brief must be filed at least three weeks before the claim construction hearing. The parties shall leave at least three weeks between the claim construction hearing and the opening of expert discovery. The parties are to use the Court's form scheduling order, which is posted at http://www.ded.uscourts.gov (see Chambers, Judge Noreika, Forms), and the parties must include a proposal for the length and timing of trial. If there are disputes or issues that the Court needs to address in the proposed scheduling order, the parties shall direct the Court to the paragraph numbers in which those appear in a cover letter to the Court. ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 9/14/2023. (dlw) (Entered: 09/14/2023) (0) |
| Aug 9, 2023 | 13 | REPLY BRIEF re 9 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim and Joinder in Motions to Dismiss Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) filed by Hive Technology, Inc.. (Hirzel, Samuel) (Entered: 08/09/2023) (7) |
| Aug 4, 2023 | 12 | MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Marc J. Rachman and Sarah Benowich of Davis+Gilbert LLP - filed by Hive Technology, Inc.. (Hirzel, Samuel) (Entered: 08/04/2023) (4) |
| Aug 4, 2023 | N/A | SO ORDERED re 12 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Marc J. Rachman and Sarah Benowich of Davis+Gilbert LLP. Ordered by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 8/4/2023. (as) (Entered: 08/04/2023) (0) |
| Aug 2, 2023 | 11 | ANSWERING BRIEF in Opposition re 9 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim and Joinder in Motions to Dismiss Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) filed by Web 2.0 Technologies, LLC.Reply Brief due date per Local Rules is 8/9/2023. (Devlin, Timothy) (Entered: 08/02/2023) (23) |
| Jul 19, 2023 | 9 | MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim and Joinder in Motions to Dismiss Under Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6) - filed by Hive Technology, Inc. (Attachments: # 1 [PROPOSED] Order to Motion to Dismiss)(Hirzel, Samuel) Modified on 7/20/2023 (dlw). (Entered: 07/19/2023) (0) |
| Jul 19, 2023 | 10 | Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by Hive Technology, Inc.. (Hirzel, Samuel) (Entered: 07/19/2023) (2) |
| Jun 20, 2023 | N/A | SO ORDERED re 8 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to move against, answer, or otherwise respond to the Complaint to July 19, 2023 (Set/Reset Answer Deadlines: Hive Technology, Inc. answer due 7/19/2023). ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 6/20/2023. (dlw) (Entered: 06/20/2023) (0) |
| Jun 19, 2023 | 8 | STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to ANSWER Complaint to July 19, 2023 - filed by Web 2.0 Technologies, LLC. (Devlin, Timothy) (Entered: 06/19/2023) (2) |
| May 5, 2023 | N/A | CORRECTING ENTRY: D.I. 8 has been deleted from the docket as it was filed in the wrong civil action. (dlw) (Entered: 05/05/2023) (0) |
| Apr 17, 2023 | 7 | STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for defendant to move against, answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint to June 19, 2023 - filed by Web 2.0 Technologies, LLC. (Devlin, Timothy) (Entered: 04/17/2023) (1) |
| Apr 17, 2023 | N/A | SO ORDERED re 7 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for defendant to move against, answer or otherwise respond to the Complaint to June 19, 2023 (Set/Reset Answer Deadlines - Hive Technology, Inc. answer due 6/19/2023). ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 4/17/2023. (dlw) (Entered: 04/17/2023) (0) |
| Mar 28, 2023 | 6 | SUMMONS Returned Executed by Web 2.0 Technologies, LLC.Hive Technology, Inc. served on 3/28/2023, answer due 4/18/2023. (Devlin, Timothy) (Entered: 03/28/2023) (2) |
| Jan 4, 2023 | N/A | Case Assigned to Judge Maryellen Noreika. Please include the initials of the Judge (MN) after the case number on all documents filed. Associated Cases: 1:23-cv-00001-MN, 1:23-cv-00002-MN, 1:23-cv-00003-MN, 1:23-cv-00004-MN (rjb) (Entered: 01/04/2023) (0) |
| Jan 1, 2023 | 1 | Complaint* (1) |
| Jan 1, 2023 | 2 | Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (mkr) (Entered: 01/03/2023) (3) |
| Jan 1, 2023 | 3 | Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) U.S. 6.845,448 B1; U.S. 8,117,644 B2. (mkr) (Entered: 01/03/2023) (1) |
| Jan 1, 2023 | 4 | Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by Web 2.0 Technologies, LLC. (mkr) (Entered: 01/03/2023) (1) |
| Jan 1, 2023 | 5 | Summons Issued as to Hive Technology, Inc. on 1/1/2023. (mkr) (Entered: 01/03/2023) (2) |
