Search
Patexia Research
Case number 1:23-cv-00003

Web 2.0 Technologies, LLC v. LiquidPlanner, Inc. > Documents

Date Field Doc. No.Description (Pages)
Nov 6, 2023 23 Amended Complaint* (1)
Oct 5, 2023 20 ORDER (ruling on pending motions to dismiss) SEE ORDER FOR COMPLETE AND FURTHER DETAILS. Signed by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 10/5/2023. (dlw) (Entered: 10/05/2023) (8)
Oct 4, 2023 19 Letter to The Honorable Maryellen Noreika from Timothy Devlin regarding Response to Court's Oral Orders. (Devlin, Timothy) (Entered: 10/04/2023) (2)
Oct 2, 2023 18 ORAL ORDER - Having reviewed the various Web2.0 Technologies cases filed in this District and beyond, it appears that in certain pending cases with substantially the same infringement allegations, Plaintiff includes as a party Pennar Software Corporation because it is purportedly "the owner by assignment of 100% interest in the Asserted Patents" i.e., U.S. Patent Nos. 6,845,448 and 8,117,644. See, e.g., First Amended Complaint, Web 2.0 Technologies LLC v. 37signals LLC d/b/a Basecamp, No. 1:23-0230 (N.D. Ill. July 11, 2023); First Amended Complaint, Web 2.0 Technologies LLC v. Nulab Inc., No. 1:23-2589 (S.D.N.Y. July 12, 2023); see also First Amended Complaint, Web 2.0 Technologies LLC v. Zendesk, Inc., No. 23-0105-MN (D. Del. Aug. 10, 2023). Pennar Software Corporation is also listed as the assignee on the face of these two patents, which are the only patents asserted in any of the Web2.0 Technologies cases in this District. Yet Pennar Software Corporation is not a plaintiff in the cases pending in this District except one (against Zendesk). THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, on or before October 4, 2023, Plaintiff shall file a letter with the Court explaining the discrepancy in plaintiffs among the various cases and indicating whether Pennar Software Corporation is a required plaintiff in all of the related cases pending before this Court. ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 10/2/2023. (dlw) (Entered: 10/02/2023) (0)
Sep 14, 2023 17 ORAL ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order, the parties shall confer regarding proposed dates in the scheduling order and shall submit a proposed, coordinated order, which is also consistent with the following guidance. The parties shall provide final contentions (i.e., final infringement and invalidity contentions, as well as final non-infringement and validity contentions) around the time that fact discovery closes (i.e., several weeks prior to or after the deadline to complete fact discovery) and at least three weeks before Plaintiff serves its opening claim construction brief. Final contentions shall include a party's contentions under its proposed construction(s), as well as under the opposing construction(s) (if such an alternative contention exists). As such, the parties are encouraged to exchange proposed claim terms and proposed constructions early in the case but in no event later than necessary to allow the parties to include alternative contentions in their final contentions. The joint claim construction chart shall be due one week after the parties have completed their exchange of final contentions, and the joint claim construction brief must be filed at least three weeks before the claim construction hearing. The parties shall leave at least three weeks between the claim construction hearing and the opening of expert discovery. The parties are to use the Court's form scheduling order, which is posted at http://www.ded.uscourts.gov (see Chambers, Judge Noreika, Forms), and the parties must include a proposal for the length and timing of trial. If there are disputes or issues that the Court needs to address in the proposed scheduling order, the parties shall direct the Court to the paragraph numbers in which those appear in a cover letter to the Court. ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 9/14/2023. (dlw) (Entered: 09/14/2023) (0)
May 9, 2023 16 REPLY BRIEF re 7 MOTION to Dismiss for Improper Venue or alternatively Transfer Venue filed by LiquidPlanner, Inc. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit Exhibit A, # 2 Affidavit Declaration of Ted Hawksford)(Holloway, David) Modified on 5/10/2023 (dlw). (Entered: 05/09/2023) (0)
May 2, 2023 13 ANSWERING BRIEF in Opposition re 7 MOTION to Dismiss for Improper Venue filed by Web 2.0 Technologies, LLC.Reply Brief due date per Local Rules is 5/9/2023. (Devlin, Timothy) (Entered: 05/02/2023) (14)
May 2, 2023 14 DECLARATION of Naren Chaganti re 13 Answering Brief in Opposition by Web 2.0 Technologies, LLC. (Devlin, Timothy) Modified on 5/2/2023 (dlw). (Entered: 05/02/2023) (3)
May 2, 2023 15 DECLARATION of Timothy Devlin re 13 Answering Brief in Opposition by Web 2.0 Technologies, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit A, # 2 Exhibit B, # 3 Exhibit C, # 4 Exhibit D)(Devlin, Timothy) Modified on 5/2/2023 (dlw). (Entered: 05/02/2023) (0)
Apr 25, 2023 12 NOTICE of Certification Pursuant to Local Rule 7.1.1 RE: LiquidPlanner Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, to Transfer Venue by LiquidPlanner, Inc. re 7 MOTION to Dismiss for Improper Venue , 9 Oral Order,, 8 Opening Brief in Support, (Holloway, David) (Entered: 04/25/2023) (2)
Apr 21, 2023 11 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: identifying Corporate Parent Tempo Software Inc. for LiquidPlanner, Inc. filed by LiquidPlanner, Inc.. (Holloway, David) (Entered: 04/21/2023) (2)
Apr 19, 2023 9 ORAL ORDER re 7 MOTION to Dismiss for Improper Venue or, alternatively, to Transfer Venue - Defendant's motion to dismiss includes a motion in the alternative "to transfer venue to the Western District of Washington" which is a nondispositive motion that, pursuant to Local Rule 7.1.1, requires an averment of counsel that a reasonable effort has been made to reach agreement with Plaintiff on this issue. THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, on or before 4/25/2023, Defendant shall file the requisite Rule 7.1.1 Statement regarding their alternative motion to transfer. ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 4/19/2023. (dlw) (Entered: 04/19/2023) (0)
Apr 19, 2023 10 ORAL ORDER - Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 7.1 (b)(1), a party must: (1) file the disclosure statement with its first appearance, pleading, petition, motion, response, or other request addressed to the court. Defendant has failed to do so. THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, on or before 4/21/2023, defendant shall file the requisite Rule 7.1 Disclosure Statement. ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 4/19/2023. (dlw) (Entered: 04/19/2023) (0)
Apr 18, 2023 7 MOTION to Dismiss for Improper Venue or, alternatively, to Transfer Venue - filed by LiquidPlanner, Inc. (Holloway, David) Modified on 4/19/2023 (dlw). (Entered: 04/18/2023) (2)
Apr 18, 2023 8 OPENING BRIEF in Support re 7 MOTION to Dismiss for Improper Venue or alternatively Transfer Venue filed by LiquidPlanner, Inc. Answering Brief/Response due date per Local Rules is 5/2/2023. (Attachments: # 1 Affidavit Declaration of Ted Hawksford)(Holloway, David) Modified on 4/19/2023 (dlw). (Entered: 04/18/2023) (0)
Mar 28, 2023 6 SUMMONS Returned Executed by Web 2.0 Technologies, LLC.LiquidPlanner, Inc. served on 3/28/2023, answer due 4/18/2023. (Devlin, Timothy) (Entered: 03/28/2023) (2)
Jan 4, 2023 N/A Case Assigned to Judge Maryellen Noreika. Please include the initials of the Judge (MN) after the case number on all documents filed. Associated Cases: 1:23-cv-00001-MN, 1:23-cv-00002-MN, 1:23-cv-00003-MN, 1:23-cv-00004-MN (rjb) (Entered: 01/04/2023) (0)
Jan 1, 2023 1 Complaint* (1)
Jan 1, 2023 2 Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (srs) (Entered: 01/03/2023) (3)
Jan 1, 2023 3 Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) U.S. 6.845,448 B1 ;U.S. 8,117,644 B2. (srs) (Entered: 01/03/2023) (1)
Jan 1, 2023 4 Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by Web 2.0 Technologies, LLC. (srs) (Entered: 01/03/2023) (1)
Jan 1, 2023 5 Summons Issued as to LiquidPlanner, Inc. on 1/3/2023. (srs) (Entered: 01/03/2023) (2)
Menu