Case number 1:23-cv-00042
Web 2.0 Technologies, LLC v. TaskWorld Inc. > Documents
| Date Field | Doc. No. | Description (Pages) |
|---|---|---|
| Oct 5, 2023 | 18 | ORDER (ruling on pending motions to dismiss) SEE ORDER FOR COMPLETE AND FURTHER DETAILS. Signed by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 10/5/2023. (dlw) (Entered: 10/05/2023) (8) |
| Oct 4, 2023 | 17 | Letter to The Honorable Maryellen Noreika from Timothy Devlin regarding Response to Court's Oral Orders. (Devlin, Timothy) (Entered: 10/04/2023) (2) |
| Oct 2, 2023 | 16 | ORAL ORDER - Having reviewed the various Web2.0 Technologies cases filed in this District and beyond, it appears that in certain pending cases with substantially the same infringement allegations, Plaintiff includes as a party Pennar Software Corporation because it is purportedly "the owner by assignment of 100% interest in the Asserted Patents" i.e., U.S. Patent Nos. 6,845,448 and 8,117,644. See, e.g., First Amended Complaint, Web 2.0 Technologies LLC v. 37signals LLC d/b/a Basecamp, No. 1:23-0230 (N.D. Ill. July 11, 2023); First Amended Complaint, Web 2.0 Technologies LLC v. Nulab Inc., No. 1:23-2589 (S.D.N.Y. July 12, 2023); see also First Amended Complaint, Web 2.0 Technologies LLC v. Zendesk, Inc., No. 23-0105-MN (D. Del. Aug. 10, 2023). Pennar Software Corporation is also listed as the assignee on the face of these two patents, which are the only patents asserted in any of the Web2.0 Technologies cases in this District. Yet Pennar Software Corporation is not a plaintiff in the cases pending in this District except one (against Zendesk). THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, on or before October 4, 2023, Plaintiff shall file a letter with the Court explaining the discrepancy in plaintiffs among the various cases and indicating whether Pennar Software Corporation is a required plaintiff in all of the related cases pending before this Court. ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 10/2/2023. (dlw) (Entered: 10/02/2023) (0) |
| Sep 14, 2023 | 15 | ORAL ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order, the parties shall confer regarding proposed dates in the scheduling order and shall submit a proposed, coordinated order, which is also consistent with the following guidance. The parties shall provide final contentions (i.e., final infringement and invalidity contentions, as well as final non-infringement and validity contentions) around the time that fact discovery closes (i.e., several weeks prior to or after the deadline to complete fact discovery) and at least three weeks before Plaintiff serves its opening claim construction brief. Final contentions shall include a party's contentions under its proposed construction(s), as well as under the opposing construction(s) (if such an alternative contention exists). As such, the parties are encouraged to exchange proposed claim terms and proposed constructions early in the case but in no event later than necessary to allow the parties to include alternative contentions in their final contentions. The joint claim construction chart shall be due one week after the parties have completed their exchange of final contentions, and the joint claim construction brief must be filed at least three weeks before the claim construction hearing. The parties shall leave at least three weeks between the claim construction hearing and the opening of expert discovery. The parties are to use the Court's form scheduling order, which is posted at http://www.ded.uscourts.gov (see Chambers, Judge Noreika, Forms), and the parties must include a proposal for the length and timing of trial. If there are disputes or issues that the Court needs to address in the proposed scheduling order, the parties shall direct the Court to the paragraph numbers in which those appear in a cover letter to the Court. ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 9/14/2023. (dlw) (Entered: 09/14/2023) (0) |
| Jun 23, 2023 | 14 | REPLY BRIEF re 11 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by TaskWorld Inc.. (Poff, Adam) (Entered: 06/23/2023) (16) |
| Jun 16, 2023 | 13 | ANSWERING BRIEF in Opposition re 11 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Web 2.0 Technologies, LLC.Reply Brief due date per Local Rules is 6/23/2023. (Devlin, Timothy) (Entered: 06/16/2023) (23) |
| Jun 2, 2023 | 11 | MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim - filed by TaskWorld Inc.. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Poff, Adam) (Entered: 06/02/2023) (0) |
| Jun 2, 2023 | 12 | OPENING BRIEF in Support re 11 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by TaskWorld Inc..Answering Brief/Response due date per Local Rules is 6/16/2023. (Poff, Adam) (Entered: 06/02/2023) (28) |
| May 19, 2023 | 10 | STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for TaskWorld Inc. to move against, answer, or otherwise respond to Web 2.0's Complaint to June 2, 2023 - filed by TaskWorld Inc.. (Stombaugh, Alexis) (Entered: 05/19/2023) (2) |
| May 19, 2023 | N/A | SO ORDERED re 10 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME for TaskWorld Inc. to move against, answer, or otherwise respond to Web 2.0's Complaint to June 2, 2023 (Set/Reset Answer Deadlines: TaskWorld Inc. answer due 6/2/2023). ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 5/19/2023. (dlw) (Entered: 05/19/2023) (0) |
| Apr 6, 2023 | 8 | STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to answer, move or otherwise respond to the Complaint to May 19, 2023 - filed by TaskWorld Inc.. (Poff, Adam) (Entered: 04/06/2023) (2) |
| Apr 6, 2023 | 9 | Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: identifying Corporate Parent SGO Global Corp., Other Affiliate Taskworld Software Limited, Other Affiliate Taskworld Singapore Pte. Ltd., Other Affiliate Taskworld Holdings Pte. Ltd. for TaskWorld Inc. filed by TaskWorld Inc.. (Poff, Adam) (Entered: 04/06/2023) (3) |
| Apr 6, 2023 | N/A | SO ORDERED re 8 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME to answer, move or otherwise respond to the Complaint to May 19, 2023 (Set/Reset Answer Deadlines: TaskWorld Inc. answer due 5/19/2023). ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 4/6/2023. (dlw) (Entered: 04/06/2023) (0) |
| Mar 30, 2023 | 7 | SUMMONS Returned Executed by Web 2.0 Technologies, LLC.TaskWorld Inc. served on 3/29/2023, answer due 4/19/2023. (Devlin, Timothy) (Entered: 03/30/2023) (2) |
| Jan 18, 2023 | N/A | Case Assigned to Judge Colm F. Connolly. Please include the initials of the Judge (CFC) after the case number on all documents filed. Associated Cases: 1:23-cv-00042-CFC, 1:23-cv-00045-CFC, 1:23-cv-00047-CFC, 1:23-cv-00049-CFC (rjb) (Entered: 01/18/2023) (0) |
| Jan 18, 2023 | N/A | Case Reassigned to Judge Maryellen Noreika (due to prior related cases 23-cv-1, 23-cv-2, 23-cv-3 and 23-cv-4). Please include the initials of the Judge (MN) after the case number on all documents filed. Associated Cases: 1:23-cv-00042-MN, 1:23-cv-00045-MN, 1:23-cv-00047-MN, 1:23-cv-00049-MN (rjb) (Entered: 01/18/2023) (0) |
| Jan 17, 2023 | 6 | Letter to Office of the Clerk from Timothy Devlin regarding Notice of Related Cases. (Devlin, Timothy) (Entered: 01/17/2023) (1) |
| Jan 13, 2023 | 1 | COMPLAINT FOR PATENT INFRINGEMENT filed with Jury Demand against TaskWorld Inc. ( Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ADEDC-4043740.) - filed by Web 2.0 Technologies, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Exhibit 1, # 2 Exhibit 2, # 3 Civil Cover Sheet)(apk) (Entered: 01/13/2023) (0) |
| Jan 13, 2023 | 2 | Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (apk) (Entered: 01/13/2023) (3) |
| Jan 13, 2023 | 3 | Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) U.S. 6,845,448 B1 ;U.S. 8,117,644 B2. (apk) (Entered: 01/13/2023) (1) |
| Jan 13, 2023 | 4 | Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by Web 2.0 Technologies, LLC. (apk) (Entered: 01/13/2023) (1) |
| Jan 13, 2023 | 5 | Summons Issued as to TaskWorld Inc. on 1/13/2023. (apk) (Entered: 01/13/2023) (2) |
