Case number 1:23-cv-00345
Web 2.0 Technologies, LLC v. Workzone, LLC > Documents
| Date Field | Doc. No. | Description (Pages) |
|---|---|---|
| Nov 6, 2023 | 25 | Amended Complaint* (1) |
| Oct 5, 2023 | 22 | ORDER (ruling on pending motions to dismiss) SEE ORDER FOR COMPLETE AND FURTHER DETAILS. Signed by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 10/5/2023. (dlw) (Entered: 10/05/2023) (8) |
| Oct 4, 2023 | 21 | Letter to The Honorable Maryellen Noreika from Timothy Devlin regarding Response to Court's Oral Orders. (Devlin, Timothy) (Entered: 10/04/2023) (2) |
| Oct 2, 2023 | 20 | ORAL ORDER - Having reviewed the various Web2.0 Technologies cases filed in this District and beyond, it appears that in certain pending cases with substantially the same infringement allegations, Plaintiff includes as a party Pennar Software Corporation because it is purportedly "the owner by assignment of 100% interest in the Asserted Patents" i.e., U.S. Patent Nos. 6,845,448 and 8,117,644. See, e.g., First Amended Complaint, Web 2.0 Technologies LLC v. 37signals LLC d/b/a Basecamp, No. 1:23-0230 (N.D. Ill. July 11, 2023); First Amended Complaint, Web 2.0 Technologies LLC v. Nulab Inc., No. 1:23-2589 (S.D.N.Y. July 12, 2023); see also First Amended Complaint, Web 2.0 Technologies LLC v. Zendesk, Inc., No. 23-0105-MN (D. Del. Aug. 10, 2023). Pennar Software Corporation is also listed as the assignee on the face of these two patents, which are the only patents asserted in any of the Web2.0 Technologies cases in this District. Yet Pennar Software Corporation is not a plaintiff in the cases pending in this District except one (against Zendesk). THEREFORE, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, on or before October 4, 2023, Plaintiff shall file a letter with the Court explaining the discrepancy in plaintiffs among the various cases and indicating whether Pennar Software Corporation is a required plaintiff in all of the related cases pending before this Court. ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 10/2/2023. (dlw) (Entered: 10/02/2023) (0) |
| Sep 14, 2023 | 19 | ORAL ORDER - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that, within thirty (30) days from the date of this Order, the parties shall confer regarding proposed dates in the scheduling order and shall submit a proposed, coordinated order, which is also consistent with the following guidance. The parties shall provide final contentions (i.e., final infringement and invalidity contentions, as well as final non-infringement and validity contentions) around the time that fact discovery closes (i.e., several weeks prior to or after the deadline to complete fact discovery) and at least three weeks before Plaintiff serves its opening claim construction brief. Final contentions shall include a party's contentions under its proposed construction(s), as well as under the opposing construction(s) (if such an alternative contention exists). As such, the parties are encouraged to exchange proposed claim terms and proposed constructions early in the case but in no event later than necessary to allow the parties to include alternative contentions in their final contentions. The joint claim construction chart shall be due one week after the parties have completed their exchange of final contentions, and the joint claim construction brief must be filed at least three weeks before the claim construction hearing. The parties shall leave at least three weeks between the claim construction hearing and the opening of expert discovery. The parties are to use the Court's form scheduling order, which is posted at http://www.ded.uscourts.gov (see Chambers, Judge Noreika, Forms), and the parties must include a proposal for the length and timing of trial. If there are disputes or issues that the Court needs to address in the proposed scheduling order, the parties shall direct the Court to the paragraph numbers in which those appear in a cover letter to the Court. ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 9/14/2023. (dlw) (Entered: 09/14/2023) (0) |
| Jun 7, 2023 | 18 | REPLY BRIEF re 12 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Workzone, LLC. (Koopman, Andrew) (Entered: 06/07/2023) (16) |
| May 31, 2023 | 17 | ANSWERING BRIEF in Opposition re 12 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Web 2.0 Technologies, LLC.Reply Brief due date per Local Rules is 6/7/2023. (Devlin, Timothy) (Entered: 05/31/2023) (23) |
| May 30, 2023 | 16 | ORAL ORDER re 15 Joint MOTION to Stay - IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the Stipulation and (Proposed) Order to Stay is DENIED. ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 5/30/2023. (dlw) (Entered: 05/30/2023) (0) |
| May 23, 2023 | 14 | MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Benjamin E. Leace - filed by Workzone, LLC. (Koopman, Andrew) (Entered: 05/23/2023) (2) |
| May 23, 2023 | N/A | SO ORDERED re 14 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Benjamin E. Leace filed by Workzone, LLC. ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 5/23/2023. (dlw) (Entered: 05/23/2023) (0) |
| May 23, 2023 | 15 | Joint MOTION to Stay - filed by Workzone, LLC. (Koopman, Andrew) (Entered: 05/23/2023) (3) |
| May 17, 2023 | 12 | MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim - filed by Workzone, LLC. (Attachments: # 1 Text of Proposed Order)(Koopman, Andrew) (Entered: 05/17/2023) (0) |
| May 17, 2023 | 13 | OPENING BRIEF in Support re 12 MOTION to Dismiss for Failure to State a Claim filed by Workzone, LLC.Answering Brief/Response due date per Local Rules is 5/31/2023. (Koopman, Andrew) (Entered: 05/17/2023) (24) |
| Apr 17, 2023 | 7 | NOTICE of Appearance by Andrew John Koopman on behalf of Workzone, LLC (Koopman, Andrew) (Entered: 04/17/2023) (1) |
| Apr 17, 2023 | 8 | NOTICE of Appearance by Christopher H. Blaszkowski on behalf of Workzone, LLC (Blaszkowski, Christopher) (Entered: 04/17/2023) (1) |
| Apr 17, 2023 | 9 | MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Benjamin E. Leace - filed by Workzone, LLC. (Koopman, Andrew) (Entered: 04/17/2023) (2) |
| Apr 17, 2023 | 10 | STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME answer, move or otherwise respond to the Complaint to May 17, 2023 - filed by Workzone, LLC. (Koopman, Andrew) (Entered: 04/17/2023) (2) |
| Apr 17, 2023 | 11 | Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by Workzone, LLC. (Koopman, Andrew) (Entered: 04/17/2023) (1) |
| Apr 17, 2023 | N/A | SO ORDERED re 9 MOTION for Pro Hac Vice Appearance of Attorney Benjamin E. Leace filed by Workzone, LLC. ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 4/17/2023. (dlw) (Entered: 04/17/2023) (0) |
| Apr 17, 2023 | N/A | SO ORDERED re 10 STIPULATION TO EXTEND TIME answer, move or otherwise respond to the Complaint to May 17, 2023 (Set/Reset Answer Deadlines - Workzone, LLC answer due 5/17/2023). ORDERED by Judge Maryellen Noreika on 4/17/2023. (dlw) (Entered: 04/17/2023) (0) |
| Apr 17, 2023 | N/A | Pro Hac Vice Attorney Benjamin E. Leace for Workzone, LLC added for electronic noticing. Pursuant to Local Rule 83.5 (d)., Delaware counsel shall be the registered users of CM/ECF and shall be required to file all papers. (twk) (Entered: 04/17/2023) (0) |
| Mar 30, 2023 | 6 | SUMMONS Returned Executed by Web 2.0 Technologies, LLC.Workzone, LLC served on 3/29/2023, answer due 4/19/2023. (Devlin, Timothy) (Entered: 03/30/2023) (2) |
| Mar 29, 2023 | N/A | Case Assigned to Judge Maryellen Noreika. Please include the initials of the Judge (MN) after the case number on all documents filed. Associated Cases: 1:23-cv-00340-UNA et al.(nms) (Entered: 03/29/2023) (0) |
| Mar 27, 2023 | 1 | Complaint* (1) |
| Mar 27, 2023 | 2 | Notice, Consent and Referral forms re: U.S. Magistrate Judge jurisdiction. (twk) (Entered: 03/28/2023) (3) |
| Mar 27, 2023 | 3 | Report to the Commissioner of Patents and Trademarks for Patent/Trademark Number(s) U.S. 6,845,448 B1; U.S. 8,117,644 B2. (twk) (Entered: 03/28/2023) (1) |
| Mar 27, 2023 | 4 | Disclosure Statement pursuant to Rule 7.1: No Parents or Affiliates Listed filed by Web 2.0 Technologies, LLC. (twk) (Entered: 03/28/2023) (1) |
| Mar 27, 2023 | 5 | Summons Issued as to Workzone, LLC on 3/28/2023. (twk) (Entered: 03/28/2023) (2) |
