SZ DJI Technology Co., Ltd. et al. v. Autel Robotics USA LLC > Summary
Court Case Number PGR2019-00016
Filing Date Nov 12, 2018
Institution Decision Date May 17, 2019
Decision Date May 14, 2020
Court Patent Trial and Appeal Board
Status Final Written Decision
Appeal2020-1988
Administrative JudgesErica A. Franklin, Jennifer Meyer Chagnon, Avelyn M. Ross
Judge Writing the Final DecisionErica A. Franklin
Claims Challenged in the Petition: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24
Claims Instituted: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24
Plaintiff
Defendant
Plaintiff Attorneys
4SZ DJI Technology Co., Ltd.
Attorney Name: Lori A. Gordon
King & Spalding
SZ DJI Technology Co., Ltd.
Attorney Name: Steven P. Petersen
King & Spalding
SZ DJI Technology Co., Ltd.
Attorney Name: Matthew Edward Carey
King & Spalding
SZ DJI Technology Co., Ltd.
Attorney Name: Juan Alonso
King & Spalding
Defendant Attorneys
7Autel Robotics Co. Ltd.
Attorney Name: Timothy C. Bickham
Steptoe LLP
Autel Robotics Co. Ltd.
Attorney Name: Matthew N. Bathon
Steptoe LLP
Autel Robotics Co. Ltd.
Attorney Name: John Abramic
Steptoe LLP
Autel Robotics Co. Ltd.
Attorney Name: Katherine H. Johnson
Steptoe LLP
Autel Robotics Co. Ltd.
Attorney Name: Harold H. Fox
Steptoe LLP
Autel Robotics Co. Ltd.
Attorney Name: Katherine D. Cappaert
Steptoe LLP
Autel Robotics Co. Ltd.
Attorney Name: Charles Reinholtz
Embry-Riddle Aeronautical University
Related Patents
Doc No | Title | Issue date |
---|---|---|
10044013 | Battery used for unmanned aerial vehicle and an unmanned aerial vehicle | Aug 7, 2018 |