Snap Inc. v. SRK Technology LLC > Summary
Court Case Number IPR2020-00820
Filing Date Apr 8, 2020
Institution Decision Date Oct 21, 2020
Decision Date Oct 19, 2021
Court Patent Trial and Appeal Board
Status Final Written Decision
Appeal2022-1284
Administrative JudgesKristen L. Droesch
Judge Writing the Final DecisionKristen L. Droesch
Claims Challenged in the Petition: 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 19, 20, 21, 23, 24, 25, 26
Claims Instituted: 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 19, 20, 21, 23, 24, 25, 26
Claims Invalidated: 1, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 19, 20, 21, 23, 24, 25, 26
Petitioner
Patent Owner
Petitioner Attorneys
5Snap Inc.
Attorney Name: Heidi L. Keefe
Cooley LLP
Snap Inc.
Attorney Name: Andrew C. Mace
Cooley LLP
Snap Inc.
Attorney Name: Mark R. Weinstein
Cooley LLP
Snap Inc.
Attorney Name: Reuben Chen
Cooley LLP
Snap Inc.
Attorney Name: Christopher Schmandt
Cooley LLP
Patent Owner Attorneys
8SRK Technology LLC
Attorney Name: Vincent J. Rubino III
Brown Rudnick LLP
SRK Technology LLC
Attorney Name: Peter Lambrianakos
Brown Rudnick LLP
SRK Technology LLC
Attorney Name: Enrique W. Iturralde
Brown Rudnick LLP
SRK Technology LLC
Attorney Name: Jialin Zhong
Zhong Law
SRK Technology LLC
Attorney Name: Alfred R. Fabricant
Brown Rudnick LLP
SRK Technology LLC
Attorney Name: Enrique W. Iturralde
Fabricant LLP
SRK Technology LLC
Attorney Name: Andrew Cromarty
Distributed Systems Technology LLC
SRK Technology LLC
Attorney Name: Ashok Tankha
Brown Rudnick LLP
Related Patents
Doc No | Title | Issue date |
---|---|---|
09930159 | Adaptive communication mode for recording a media message | Mar 27, 2018 |