Palo Alto Networks, Inc. v. Finjan, Inc. > Summary
Court Case Number IPR2016-00159
Filing Date Nov 6, 2015
Institution Decision Date May 13, 2016
Decision Date Apr 11, 2017
Court Patent Trial and Appeal Board
Status FWD Entered
Appeal2017-2034
Administrative JudgesCharles J. Boudreau, James B. Arpin, Zhenyu Yang
Judge Writing the Final DecisionCharles J. Boudreau
Claims Challenged in the Petition: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18
Claims Instituted: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15
Claims Invalidated: 1, 2, 6
Petitioner
Patent Owner
Petitioner Attorneys
7Palo Alto Networks
Attorney Name: Andrew S. Brown
Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati
Palo Alto Networks
Attorney Name: Michael T. Rosato
Wilson Sonsini Goodrich & Rosati
Palo Alto Networks
Attorney Name: Jennifer Volk-Fortier
Cooley LLP
Palo Alto Networks
Attorney Name: Brian J. Eutermoser
Cooley LLP
Palo Alto Networks
Attorney Name: Christopher Max Colice
Cooley LLP
Palo Alto Networks
Attorney Name: Orion Armon
Cooley LLP
Patent Owner Attorneys
6Finjan Holdings, Inc.
Attorney Name: Michael Kim
Finjan Holdings, Inc.
Finjan Holdings, Inc.
Attorney Name: Shannon H. Hedvat
Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel
Finjan Holdings, Inc.
Attorney Name: Mike H. Lee
Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel
Finjan Holdings, Inc.
Attorney Name: Jeffrey H. Price
Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel
Finjan Holdings, Inc.
Attorney Name: James R. Hannah
Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel
Attorney Name: Paul J. Andre
Kramer Levin Naftalis & Frankel
Related Patents
| Doc No | Title | Issue date |
|---|---|---|
| 08677494 | Malicious mobile code runtime monitoring system and methods | Mar 18, 2014 |
