Search
Patexia Community
News and Analysis

Our Members

All »
keith white
Hye Jung Jang
shash sen
Ivan Yeung
Tooraj Rajabioun
mike williams
Ivan Perez
Kourosh Salehi
sepideh espiary
Alaleh Mani
Karen Fernley
Mehrdad Fatourechi
Seth Levy
jameswar prusty
Martin Alcala

Innovation, Technology, and IP News

Major Med Device Product Developer GE HealthCare Collaborating with Healthcare Providers

Written by: Kregg Koch For good reasons, including product safety, quality assurance, development of delivery procedures and instructions, it has been a common practice for medical...

Fresh From the Bench: Latest Precedential Patent Cases

CASE OF THE WEEK Baxalta Inc. v. Genentech, Inc., Appeal No. 22-1461 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 20, 2023) Our Case of the Week focuses on the enablement requirement. It’s the first case...

Enter TitleFederal Circuit Revisits Standard for Enablement of Antibody Claims

Written by: Ashley C. Morales & Joseph Mallon, Ph.D. In Baxalta Incorporated v. Genentech, Inc., 2022-1461, the Federal Circuit affirmed the district court’s decision...

Fresh From the Bench: Latest Precedential Patent Cases

CASE OF THE WEEK Columbia Sportswear North America, Inc. v. Seirus Innovative Accessories, Inc., Appeal Nos. 2021-2299, -2338 (Fed. Cir. Sept. 15, 2023) In a decade-old case that has ...

Prosecution History May Support a Motivation to Combine

Written by: Rhett D. Ramsey & Jacob R. Rosenbaum Elekta Limited v. Zap Surgical Systems, Inc. Before: Reyna, Stoll, and Stark. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. ...

Landmark CAFC Cases in Patent Law: Shaping the Future of Innovation

In the ever-evolving landscape of patent law, the Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit (CAFC) has played a pivotal role in shaping the rules and precedents governing intellectual...

Feed tagged as "claim construction":
IPR Decision Based on a Barely Mentioned Typo Violated the APA Notice Requirement
Knobbe Martens Sep 14, 2023
Written by:Brianne M. Kingery & Daniel Kiang APPLE INC. v. COREPHOTONICS, LTD. Before Stoll, Linn, and Stark. Appeal from the... Read More »
Comment: 0 Favorite (0)
IPR Petitioners Must Be Permitted to Respond to Claim Constructions First Proposed in Patent Owner Response
Knobbe Martens Aug 9, 2023
Written by: Joshua C. Loader & Justin J. Gillett AXONICS, INC. v. MEDTRONIC, INC. Before Dyk, Lourie, and Taranto. Appeal... Read More »
Comment: 0 Favorite (0)
If a Case Was Baseless, It Would Have Ended Sooner
Knobbe Martens May 25, 2023
Written by: Matthew Pham & Daniel P. Hughes OneSubsea IP UK Limited v. FMC Technologies, Inc. Before Clevenger, Moore, and ... Read More »
Comment: 0 Favorite (0)
Potential Claim Construction Error Is Harmless When Not Relied Upon by the Board
Knobbe Martens May 10, 2023
Written by: Ashley C. Morales & Hans L. Mayer BOT M8 LLC v. SONY INTERACTIVE ENTERTAINMENT LLC Before Prost, Reyna, and... Read More »
Comment: 0 Favorite (0)
What You “Said” in Your Claims May Be Limiting
Knobbe Martens Apr 13, 2023
Written by: Jack Hendershott & Jacob R. Rosenbaum SALAZAR V. AT&T MOBILITY LLC Before Stoll, Schall, and Stark. Appeal ... Read More »
Comment: 0 Favorite (0)
Patent Directed to System for Controlling Access to Drugs Is Not Listable in the Orange Book
Knobbe Martens Feb 27, 2023
Written by: Tyler S. Cox & Kendall Loebbaka JAZZ PHARMACEUTICALS, INC. v. AVADEL CNS PHARMACEUTICALS, LLC Before Lourie... Read More »
Comment: 0 Favorite (0)
“Filtering” Appropriate Claim Construction Reasoning
Knobbe Martens Feb 14, 2023
Written by: Emily K. McCorry & Douglas B. Wentzel SSI TECHS., LLC v. DONGGUAN ZHENGYANG ELECTRONIC MECHANICAL LTD. Before... Read More »
Comment: 0 Favorite (0)
It’s Not the Size of the Chamber That Matters, It’s How You Describe It in the Intrinsic Record
Knobbe Martens Jan 12, 2023
Written by: Brandon G. Smith GRACE INSTRUMENT INDUS. V. CHANDLER INSTRUMENTS CO. Before Chen, Cunningham, and Stark. Appeal... Read More »
Comment: 0 Favorite (0)
Restrictive Definitions Incorporated by Reference Do Not Necessarily Control for Later Patents in the Same Family
Knobbe Martens Nov 3, 2022
Written by: Blake A. Winn & Daniel P. Hughes FINJAN LLC v. ESET, LLC Before Reyna, Prost, and Taranto. Appeal from the... Read More »
Comment: 0 Favorite (0)
Restrictive Definitions Incorporated by Reference Do Not Necessarily Control for Later Patents in the Same Family
Knobbe Martens Nov 3, 2022
Written by: Blake A. Winn & Daniel P. Hughes FINJAN LLC v. ESET, LLC Before Reyna, Prost, and Taranto. Appeal from the... Read More »
Comment: 0 Favorite (0)
Expert’s Unanswered Questions Do Not Make Claims Indefinite
Knobbe Martens Oct 17, 2022
NATURE SIMULATION SYSTEMS INC. v. AUTODESK, INC. Before: Newman, Lourie, and Dyk. Appeal from the Northern District of California... Read More »
Comment: 0 Favorite (0)
Concentration of a Sub-Topically Applied Compound Is Measured at Topical Application
Knobbe Martens Jun 15, 2022
UNIVERSITY OF MASSACHUSETTS v. L’ORÉAL S.A. Before Prost, Mayer, and Taranto. Appeal from the United States District Court for ... Read More »
Comment: 0 Favorite (0)
Claims With Clerical Errors Can Be Judicially Corrected and Willfully Infringed
Knobbe Martens Jun 3, 2022
PAVO SOLUTIONS LLC v. KINGSTON TECHNOLOGY COMPANY, INC. Before: Lourie, Prost, and Chen.  Appeal from the United States District Court ... Read More »
Comment: 0 Favorite (0)
No “Automatic” Review Under O2 Micro
Knobbe Martens May 24, 2022
KAUFMAN v. MICROSOFT CORPORATION Before Dyk, Reyna, and Taranto. Appeal from the District Court for the Southern District of New York ... Read More »
Comment: 0 Favorite (0)
Negative Claim Construction Found Inadequate
Knobbe Martens May 12, 2022
SOUND VIEW INNOVATIONS, LLC v. HULU, LLC Before Prost, Mayer, and Taranto. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central... Read More »
Comment: 0 Favorite (0)
“Pliable” Language Results in “Resilient” Patent Claims
Knobbe Martens Apr 12, 2022
NIAZI LICENSING CORPORATION v. ST. JUDE MEDICAL S.C., INC. Before Taranto, Bryson, and Stoll.  Appeal from the U.S. District Court for ... Read More »
Comment: 0 Favorite (0)
Construction That Eliminates Entire Scope of Dependent Claims Should Be Avoided
Knobbe Martens Apr 5, 2022
LITTELFUSE, INC. v. MERSEN USA EP CORP. Before Prost, Bryson, and Stoll.  Appeal from the U.S. District Court for the District of... Read More »
Comment: 0 Favorite (0)
Sounding Off: Prosecution Disclaimer Requires Unambiguous Intrinsic Evidence
Knobbe Martens Apr 4, 2022
GENUINE ENABLING TECHNOLOGY LLC V. NINTENDO CO., LTD Before Newman, Reyna, and Stoll. Appeal from the Western District of Washington. ... Read More »
Comment: 0 Favorite (0)
Effects of Proximity, Plurals, and Passive Voice for Claim Construction
Knobbe Martens Mar 11, 2022
APPLE INC. v. MPH TECHNOLOGIES OY Before Moore, Prost, and Taranto. Appeal from Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Summary: The... Read More »
Comment: 0 Favorite (0)
Claims Survive IPR Challenge Under Narrow Construction Because It Was The Broadest Reasonable Interpretation
Knobbe Martens Feb 7, 2022
QUANERGY SYSTEMS, INC. v. VELODYNE LIDAR USA, INC. Before Newman, Lourie, and O’Malley. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board. Summary: Despite... Read More »
Comment: 0 Favorite (0)
Show more Newsfeed posts
Menu