News and Analysis
Innovation, Technology, and IP News
Patexia Insight 194: The Top Lateral Moves of PTAB Attorneys in 2023
The Patent Trial and Appeal Board (PTAB) holds a pivotal position within intellectual property law, wielding substantial influence over patent validity determinations and dispute...
The First FDA Approved, Chinese Developed, PD-1 Inhibitor For Nasopharyngeal Carcinoma
Written by: Jason J. Jardine On October 27th, 2023, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) approved LOQTORZITM (toripalimab-tpzi), developed by Coherus BioSciences, Inc...
Tata Faces Trade Secrets Setback: $210M Damages in DXC Technology Case, Jury Says
Tata Consultancy Services (TCS), a prominent Indian software conglomerate, has recently been embroiled in a legal battle with DXC Technology, resulting in a substantial setback. A ...
FDA Issues Long-Overdue Regulations on Direct-To-Consumer Advertisements for Prescription Medications
Written by: Lucas P. Koziol, Ph.D. & Michael L. Fuller On November 21, 2023, the FDA published its final rule changing how prescriptions medicines are advertised to...
Feed tagged as "standing":
UNILOC USA, INC. v. MOTOROLA MOBILITY LLC
Before Lourie, Dyk, and Hughes. Appeal from U.S. District Court for the District of... Read More »
MITEK SYS., INC. V. UNITED SERVS. AUTO. ASS’N
Before Dyk, Taranto, and Cunningham. Appeal from the U.S. District Court for the... Read More »
MODERNATX, INC. v. ARBUTUS BIOPHARMA CORPORATION
Before Lourie, O’Malley, and Stoll. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board.
Summary... Read More »
MODERNATX, INC. v. ARBUTUS BIOPHARMA CORPORATION
Before Lourie, O’Malley and Stoll. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board.
Summary... Read More »
APPLE, INC. v. QUALCOMM, INC.
Before Newman, Prost, and Stoll. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board.
Summary: Apple lacked standing to appeal an IPR... Read More »
APPLE, INC. v. QUALCOMM, INC.
Before Moore, Reyna, and Hughes. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board.
Summary: Apple lacked standing to appeal an IPR... Read More »
AUSTRALIAN THERAPEUTIC v. NAKED TM, LLC
Before O’Malley, Reyna, and Wallach. Appeal from the Trademark Trial and Appeal Board
Summary: Standing to ... Read More »
ADIDAS AG v. NIKE, INC.
Before Moore, Taranto, and Chen. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board.
Summary: A patent challenger can establish ... Read More »
Written by: Jeremiah S. Helm, Ph.D. & Mark Kachner
GRIT ENERGY SOLUTIONS, LLC v. OREN TECHNOLOGIES, LLC
Before Prost, Newman, Wallach. On appeal... Read More »
ARGENTUM PHARM. LLC v. NOVARTIS PHARM. CORP.
Before Lourie, Moore, and Reyna. Appeal from the U.S. Patent and Trademark Office, Patent Trial and Appeal... Read More »
Federal Circuit Summary
Before Newman, Dyk, and Chen. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board.
Summary: An injury-in-fact is required to establish ... Read More »
Federal Circuit Summary
Before Lourie, Bryson, and Wallach. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board.
Summary: A party... Read More »
Federal Circuit Summary
Before Lourie, Chen, and Stoll. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board.
Summary: A generic pharmaceutical ... Read More »
Federal Circuit Summary
Before Prost, Dyk, and O’Malley. Appeal from the Patent and Trial Appeal Board.
Summary: An IPR petitioner lacks standing... Read More »
Federal Circuit Summary
Before Reyna, Taranto, and Hughes. Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California
Summary: An... Read More »
Federal Circuit Summary
Before Newman, Clevenger, and Wallach. Appeal from the Patent Trial and Appeal Board.
Summary: The USPTO has standing to... Read More »
