Smith & Nephew, Inc.. v. ConforMIS, Inc. > Summary
Court Case Number IPR2017-00983
Filing Date Feb 28, 2017
Court Patent Trial and Appeal Board
Status Terminated-Denied
Administrative JudgesJames A. Worth, Patrick R. Scanlon, Amanda F. Wieker
Judge Writing the Final DecisionJames A. Worth
Claims Challenged in the Petition: 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, 9, 10, 11, 12, 13, 14, 15, 16, 17, 18, 19, 20, 21, 22, 23, 24, 25, 28, 29, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38, 39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46
Petitioner
Patent Owner
Petitioner Attorneys
4Smith & Nephew
Attorney Name: Christy G. Lea
Knobbe Martens
Smith & Nephew
Attorney Name: Joseph Robert Re
Knobbe Martens
Smith & Nephew
Attorney Name: Colin B. Heideman
Knobbe Martens
Smith & Nephew
Attorney Name: Jay D. Mabrey
Texas A&M University System
Patent Owner Attorneys
5ConforMIS
Attorney Name: Timothy P. McAnulty
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner
ConforMIS
Attorney Name: Daniel F. Klodowski
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner
ConforMIS
Attorney Name: Kassandra M. Officer
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner
ConforMIS
Attorney Name: Lauren K. Young
Finnegan, Henderson, Farabow, Garrett & Dunner
Related Patents
Doc No | Title | Issue date |
---|---|---|
08657827 | Surgical tools for arthroplasty | Feb 25, 2014 |